I wrote a somewhat negative review of Edge of Destiny. I see many problems with it. A long sequence of fights, little character development, a wit that does not equal Ghosts quality, somewhat bizarre behaviour, or at least, beahviour not fully explained or fleshed out by the book. I suppose I could go on but my review is here.
http://huntersinsight.wordpress.com/2010/12/31/edge-of-destiny-review/
I thought I would generally strike upon the popular opinion of people who've read the book, but as more and more people read it and talked about it on twitter, forums, blogs, whatever, I found that I was in the minority.
Is it just that Edge of Destiny is more recent and therefore riding it's current hype? Or am I wrong and Edge Of Destiny has elements that Ghosts of Ascalon does not?
edit: forgot to mention my review is spoiler filled. sorry
Edited, Jan 8th 2011 9:46pm by HuntersInsight