Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Can we have:Follow

#27 May 28 2007 at 11:05 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,553 posts
The biggest reason for no images is avoiding 3rd party content. We currently allow users to upload the images they show as their avatars, and any image tags in posts thing would have to be the same sort of thing.

Which means we need to write ourselves a good quality image hosting service before we do img tags in posts.
____________________________
--Illia
Fumus, draco magus incoluit mare.
Myrx - 70 Holy Priest, Myr - 70 Resto Shaman, Gryd - 70 Prot Warrior
#28 May 28 2007 at 11:09 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
2196 posts
Score: Negative [-0.34]

Smiley: lol
#29 May 28 2007 at 12:01 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
Quote:
You mean there's a computer program that can parse and rate images according to that thing called human morality that exists differently person to person?


Hell, Google does it. If sites can run their ads then they can certainly steal their software.
#30 May 28 2007 at 12:06 PM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
Google does it by filtering out words in your search and filtering certain images if the sites they come from contain words that fit into their "filter" context.

You can google image search for a word they don't yet recognise like "lolicon" and get plenty of stuff past the "filter".

The problem we'd have is we won't have the ability to use meta tags and words.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 68 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (68)