Not meaning to put an adversarial turn on this, but I'm curious as to what manner of computer problem he had, that was not able to be fixed/resolved in 4 months?
While I understand your frustration, and agree that SE's decision to make the existing Key Codes invalid, forcing users to re-invest in a new copy of the game, I still think that their expectation that any user suffering computer malfunction could get it solved in 3 months is lenient and not inappropriate.
Incidentally, I am also curious:
Since automatic billing is the preferred method of ongoing payment, I assume that he logged into POL to deactivate his account once he realized that it would be a long time before he could play again, so as to prevent recurring charges for a game that he couldn't play.
(I make this assumption because if his computer were totally inoperative, and he could not even access POL to cancel his account, then automatic billing would have continued, regardless of whether he ever logged in or not to play)
Since it is not necessary to cancel your entire POL account, just your Content IDs (which will retain character data for three months), why did he not simply do that?
When it is necessary to extend those three months, you are able to reactivate the Content IDs, and, subsequently, deactivate them again for another three months of holding.
You will be billed for the month during which you reactivated them, but 12 dollars is better than 48 or 72 dollars, to ensure that your character data is maintained for 4-6 months.
I sympathize with you (and your nephew) in this situation, but careful reading and comprehension of the terms of your service (by reading the manual before you begin playing) is the player/user's responsibility.
SE fulfills their end of the responsibility by providing the information, packaged with the game.
They aren't "pulling a stunt" at all. These terms and conditions
existed before your nephew made his account or even bought the game, and the onus is on him and his parents (assuming he is a young lad) to be aware of those conditions.
We can take issue with their practices and policies all we want,
but the fact remains that when we sign up and log in, we are agreeing to the terms they have set down.
It is our responsibility to understand what terms we are agreeing to, and chose from there whether or not we wish to be a part of them.
I grumble a lot (all the time, really) about how my bank charges me $22 every time one of my checks goes through with insufficient funds, and they pay it for me anyway.
I grumble because even if they chose not to pay it for me, if they instead send it back unpaid, they still charge me $22.
I grumble about it feeling unjust and unfair and about being bent over the barrel and paying the bank's operating fees from my very very poor pocketbook, while those with far more money than I, who could afford to do so and never even miss the money, never have this happen to them.
However, it's only "wrong" if they didn't inform me that this was their practice, when I made the account.
As far as they are concerned, if I write a check that bounces, and get charged a fee by the bank, I am making an informed decision and chosing to accept the consequences, whether (in reality) it was actually my choice for it to happen or not.
Edited, Fri Nov 12 17:20:48 2004 by Tenmiles