« Previous 1 2 3 Next »

Reply To Thread

Why multiple accounts on FV?Follow

#52 Jan 24 2004 at 4:06 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Patrician wrote:

Here is a good plkace to make friends

I beg to differ - this is a good place to howl with the wolfs and a bad place to try swimming upstream (don't know if that saying exists in english also)

Patrician wrote:

Quote:

Capice?

It is the Italian for "Do you understand?". Got it now dumbass?

just a lie - at BEST it means "got it?" no one of my italian friends would use "Capice" if he means to be polite or frendly

Patrician wrote:

Möglicherweise Ihr Kopf, da er scheint, in den Wolken zu sein?

well - at least that proves my english is better than your german (or that of the translation site you use)

Edited, Sat Jan 24 04:25:16 2004 by Leiany

#53 Jan 24 2004 at 4:08 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry, I just found it very funny to watch you criticize a typo.

well as a native german speaker I am allowed as many typos in a post as any native english speaker. unfortunately for the later most of their posts exceed my percentage of typos in number

#54 Jan 24 2004 at 4:10 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Anonymous wrote:

Gosh! Some people have TIME to waste.... and I am NOT talking about Leiany!!!!!

Leiany, you have the right to ask whatever question you want in which ever way you want. That IS the purpose of a forum. Unfortunately, some people will ALWAYS assume ownership of the "answer" section and take ANY, I repeat ANY other comment as an attack on their person, and let me not forget, call people that post anonymous messages cowards, as if having an E-mail attached to a posting will grant validity to their points.

To "the others", and you know VERY WELL who you are, Flame all you want, I won't be back to read the flames. I am just doing my best to make your day a happy one, for what would be another day for you without another post to rant about, another opportunity to save the world from the ignorance that is consuming it? Go ahead, post your comment, we all know you can not be outsmarted, we all now you have to have the last word. We all know you WILL post again, and again, and again... Well, you win, you will have the last word/posting. I got better things to do with my time.

Too bad the forums do not have /ignore command ;-(

Oh... I almost forgot to answer your original question, Leiany! I dual box and have 2 accounts on FV so I can spare the people that "answered" your question in this post from the pain of, mistakenly, of course, ending up grouping with me.

Mousy the Coward
iamafraidofyou@idntkr.com

P.S. Life is short, stop reading this rant and get back to play.

Belive it or not this is not an anon post by myself and as it is anon I can not count it on speaking on my behalf ;(

#55 Jan 24 2004 at 4:11 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Patrician wrote:

Got it now dumbass?

I got it very early in the discussion I just like it that way wise-*** :D

#56 Jan 24 2004 at 4:23 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Nobby wrote:

Leiany, I've never had a beef with you and enjoyed/valued a number of your posts in other threads. I hope to see more. As for this thread; the hole's quite deep enough now; I'd put away the spade if I were you

Nobby wrote:

Can I take that back now?

Be my guest. From now on I will assume you had "beef" with me from the start on and you never enjoyed/valued any of my posts in other threads and that you pray to the gods you don't see more.

Nobby wrote:

Oh, btw. 'Si tu veux t'enrager ici, ton choix d'adversaire, c'est important'. Verstehen sie?

well as someone who always thought that one is measured by the quality of his enemies and not by the quality of his friends I sure am dissapointed about who picked on me.

But maybe it will starting to be more than just a rat pack nibbling at my toes.

Edited, Sat Jan 24 04:47:12 2004 by Leiany

#57 Jan 24 2004 at 4:43 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

borbleoot wrote:

The 1 character per account rule helps encourage role play by helping you focus more on your main story line rather than being distracted by a myriad of alts. An alt cost money on FV so it better be worth your money to have it.

Well it seems at least one other player believes the 1 char/account rule was developed (originally) to encourage roleplay ;)

#58 Jan 24 2004 at 5:59 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1592260029744

Guru

2,514 posts

You have become better at babbling (250)

#59 Jan 24 2004 at 6:44 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1656893885245

View User Forum

Guru

894 posts

Wow, what a messy thread.

#60 Jan 24 2004 at 6:45 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Just make yourself comfortable :)

#61 Jan 24 2004 at 6:48 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Goalkeeper wrote:

You have become better at babbling (250)

could you borrow me your grandmaster tool then for a moment?

#62 Jan 24 2004 at 7:09 AM Rating: Decent

Scholar

3,166 posts

I think its more a case of

"You have become better at alienating people who were originally sympathetic by your arrogance and prejudice (250)"

You spoke of your rogue in the past tense in another thread, Leiany? Does that mean you have abandoned the idea?

____________________________

Wherever I go - there I am.

#63 Jan 24 2004 at 8:16 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1592260029744

Guru

2,514 posts

I think I read she rerolled into an enchanter, Cobra. Somewhere in the big pile of quote-tossing.

Which is for the better.

#64 Jan 24 2004 at 8:48 AM Rating: Decent

Scholar

3,166 posts

Quote:

I think I read she rerolled into an enchanter, Cobra. Somewhere in the big pile of quote-tossing.

Which is for the better.

Yes I have rarely run into such a ******
of quotes.

So what is the next big idea? An enchanter-only guild? Mezzing in useless in groups?

No doubt we'll get some lectures on jewelcraft.

Waiting with bated breath

____________________________

Wherever I go - there I am.

#65 Jan 24 2004 at 10:04 AM Rating: Decent

Ministry of Silly Cnuts

19,524 posts

Cobra101 wrote:

"You have become better at alienating people who were originally sympathetic by your arrogance and prejudice (250)"

Ahh now that's what I thought Cobra. I'd been pretty supportive and was under the illusion that I thought Leiany was a pretty neat poster. Smiley: confused

Smiley: confused

But then. . .

Leiany wrote:

From now on I will assume you had "beef" with me from the start on and you never enjoyed/valued any of my posts in other threads.

So there you go. Not only an expert on EQ, but is prepared to correct me on my own thoughts! Impressive! Smiley: cool

Sometimes I despair Smiley: banghead

Smiley: banghead

____________________________

"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve

#66 Jan 24 2004 at 10:57 AM Rating: Decent

Scholar

3,166 posts

Don't despair, Nobby.

Being a cunning linguist myself I always adopt the motto

non illegitemus carborundum

____________________________

Wherever I go - there I am.

#67 Jan 24 2004 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Nobby wrote:

Leiany, I've never had a beef with you and enjoyed/valued a number of your posts in other threads. I hope to see more. As for this thread; the hole's quite deep enough now; I'd put away the spade if I were you

Nobby wrote:

Can I take that back now?

You wanted to take that back - and takin that back means:
- instead of having NO beef with me you HAD beef with me
- instead of enjoying/valuing a number of my posts in other threads you did certainly NOT
- instead of hoping to see more you hope you NEVER see one again.

or maybe I am wrong and you did not want to take that back but instead "that the hole's quite deep enough" - would aslo make more sense regarding your last post.

So if i did misunderstand you I apologize and thereby fullfill your hope to see more post from me :D

Edited, Sat Jan 24 12:25:52 2004 by Leiany

#68 Jan 24 2004 at 1:52 PM Rating: Decent

Ministry of Silly Cnuts

19,524 posts

Annoying person with irritating nasal voice wrote:

I think you'll find that's not a precise definition of pedantic

My this is fun. Smiley: clap

When does the jelly and ice-cream arrive!
But all too soon our Mummies and Daddies will pick us up and this thread will all be a distant memory. Smiley: frown

____________________________

"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve

#69 Jan 24 2004 at 6:13 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1591799280781

955 posts

Well @Nobby you are the third one who -once confronted with his misunderstandings and misinterpretations beyond doubt and unable to provide further arguments- tries the easy escape route. I'll get the other ones too :)

But I have to admit that -once proven wrong- to resort that the other on's pedantic is terribly lame

Btw: as my mummy and daddy are already dead I hope they don't pick me up as you supposed.

« Previous 1 2 3 Next »

Reply To Thread

Recent Visitors: 98 All times are in CST

Anonymous Guests (98)

© 2025 Fanbyte LLC