My Favorite Classes And Worst ClassesFollow

Oh God...

Hmm...I see flames in this thread's future.

I'm still dumbstruck... but after reading the post again, all i can do is giggle.

<left eye twitches>

Ok Hi Everyone im new here (yes from reading your post below we can gather that)and I think that The Following classes Are Good For EQ soloing and grouping. and ones that suck

(no I would say that you just suck at playing them).

Necromancers are good only if you know how to use em right.

(and the right way would be?)

Bards strait up suck cause you can only play 1 at a time.

(god helps us if you ever get a second account!)

Warriors. Only reason i like cause they can use most gear.

(and your mum lets you use her credit card to buy the gear on ebay)

Shamans, are pretty good with there spells but not as good as wizards, and other mages.

(and all these years I thought Shaman were a priest class! Better start raising my Shaman's INT for mana...)

Clerics, They ok i mean for grouping for a hard mob that always hurts u and i like temp:)

(Well learn to assist the MT and stop wasting the clerics mana, because you keep getting agro)

Druids, It claims SoW is the best spell, Barb Shamans get that earlyer than druids...

(you realy don't have a clue do you?)

Bezerkers suck.

(... are you going to tell us why they suck or do we have to guess?)

Beast lords are fun. You get a different creature within certain Lvls So ur not stuck wit the same skelaton look always.

(WTF? My Iksar beastlord is my Main toon. He's had the same Scalebeast Warder for the last 57 levels. You have no idea at all what you are talking about.)

Mage, They ok For pet, magic spells necromancers are better.

(but shaman are worse than both right?)

Wizards, I like em alot they good spell casters and i like the transportin spells.

(Clerics, They ok i mean for grouping for a hard mob that always hurts u)(...you play a Wizard don't you and you're always looking for a rez, when grouped... tell me I'm wrong.)

Paladin, They just Sucky warrior/cleric

(groan! it just gets worse...)

ShadowKnight again Half breeds tend to suck alot sometimes this class can be a good class if used right.

(so you nuked on incoming, with your L337 Wizard skillz and you're pissed at the SK for not keeping agro?)

Enchanter. why would you wanna change into a illusion just for looks u get no power ups but u can sneak into cities... or confuse players by going /a well it kinda gets boring but its a pretty good class for spell enchants and flying sword:)

(I'm still chuckling at the flying swords comment...)

Monks, They suck nobody plays em anymore

(you're right! ...and they can't nuke as well as Necro's and Mage's!

Rouge, Never tryed you tell me if they good or not
(it's not Rouge, it's ROGUE! you moron...)

Ps. I wish those big boats still worked into EQ I hate Pok I lag to death, I wish there was other transportation besides transportation.

(I think you should just quit EQ and go back to playing Nintendo)

Question:) if U dont run the patch In EQ like if i go to settings and Type PatchMe Will my game messup or will i lag more or will my settions not be updated?

(what do you think, because I don't care...)



Edited, Sun Oct 3 18:19:53 2004 by lagduff

Wow, you don't know anything do you.

ps You forgot Rangers.

Monks suck???? Look at the perfect group threads, Monks are often involved, as you get a puller, and the second highest sustained DPS in the game, they can also take a hit, unlike your feeble wizard. Yea, they suck.

Have you ever played with an enchanter? What about haste, slowing, debuffing, mana regen and mez. That stuff is boring.

elorianBlah there is no need to make a sock puppet you know.

Whoa this isn't me. If i wanted to troll I would have done a much better job than this thank you kindly.

Who is ahead of you?

Pfft, now I know you are lying. Let just say from level 1-59, what makes rangers due more damage, is it their their "kick", Natural Haste, what is it that puts them on top? Is it their nukes that decrease their DPS, all their special attack? Please tell me what it is, that put ranger on top. Rangers may be on top post EQ/AM3 with an elemental bow for a while, but that is about it.

to clarify this, at 59, rangers get a 450 point nuke. not factoring in resists, that is 180 dps. at 59, without aas, I doubt any ranger does anywhere NEAR that in melee, even after factoring in resists.

Really?



You are joking right, are you telling me a ranger can nuke for 180dps at level 59?

Calefaction



9 is a little lower than 180.

Yes and I know you can cast calefaction, and then Icewind, for positive DPS gain. but you still lose 5.5 seconds of melee, which I would guess that I do about at least 80 dps at level 59. So lets see, do de do de do, I gain 800 damage and lose 480, for a net 320 damage gain. with a recast of 45 seconds on the Calefaction, and 18 seconds oin the icewind. Deadly I will admit. SO every 32ish seconds I get 320 spell damage, roughly, which mean a net gain of 10 DPS, taking me to roughly 90 DPS assuming no resists? How much does your best Monk special move do at level 59. How much melee damage do you lose for performing it, what is your DPS gain? Plus your natural haste.

Ok tell me what rangers have that put us on top? Which combination of AA's. EQ/AM3, is that it? This puts us on top forever more, right through time and into GoD, and now Omens? Or does most of the game constitute post EQ/AM3, and pre-time.

Edited, Sun Oct 3 22:42:29 2004 by Reinman

Typo, don't be an idiot.

Ok you got me, I don't know much about Monks aside from hearsay, I will have to look into this more. I accepted everyones claims that monks were a firm number 2. I will find out if there is any credence to your claim, and get back with either an apology, or more fact and figures.

I would listen to czae he knows what he is talking about.

Ranger DPS>monk dps....shoot in some cases War DPS>monk dps.

Yeah, there are some real gems here...

1.

I think there's supposed to be an "are" in there somewhere... otherwise, you're a pervert.

2.

Generally, it's considered to be pretty rude to call someone a halfbreed (even half elves don't like that, it's just not kosher). And SK's are HYBRIDS, as in a combination of multiple classes.

3.

Which would explain the existence of the all bard guild, Molto Espressivo, on FV. And yes, they do have all bard groups.