Quote:
but it does look like your toon is slightly below average
I'm better geared than fully ornate, without consideration to worn/proc/click effects.
Edit 1: I am not better geared than fully ornate. But a difference of 200hp does not make the better tank, when considering what is expected of a tank (as you've mentioned). If I were fully ornate geared, I'd have +200hp +111ac. Whoopee. What's important to consider, is there are equations that deal with Mean, Median, Mode, Deviation, Skewdness, and Kurtosis; I refer to these collectively as the MDSK, and use the set of equations created by Folk(1974) to interpret data.
In short, in a population of samples where the lowest is 2710 and the highest is 4883, the Median, or middle number, is the average of 2710 and 4883, but not the average of all sample populations.
A common consideration is made that the top and bottom echelon's are non-representative. For example, while the highest sample may be 4883, the next highest sample could be 4210, followed closely by 4189, etc, making the 4883 sample appear as an anamoly.
Edit 2: Unbuffed: HP = 3432, AC = 1051... and you'd be damn proud to have me as your tank at my level. I have keys for, getting agro, off tanking, attack my target, incoming. Think of how many times your tank doesn't communicate with the group? I have a deep appreciation for combat communication, and that makes me better than a tank that does not communicate.
Edited, Sun Aug 21 12:53:57 2005 by tchzarmok Edited, Sun Aug 21 13:10:22 2005 by tchzarmok