some help please!Follow

Make a mage? Not all that gear dependent. Pet can tank.

Since you state that you're poor and don't have a lot of money I would pick the monk over the warrior. With a monk you can be a great addition to a group being the puller. Monks aren't as gear dependent as warriors. Warriors are more expensive gear wise. They also have to get agro type gear to help maintain their agro. With a monk you can add dps and pulling ability. You can also offtank adds or if the main tank goes down.

also have you considered a beastlord? Relatively inexpensive to gear up and makes a nice duo with a druid.

Thanks felicite , When i get home tonight ill look you up. Ive desided to do a monk since its going to be cheaper gear wize... plus monk is the one class that ive never played before.. so will be a nice change up for me... thanks for everyones post thus far.. has defantly help me make a good decision.

I 2 box a monk and a shammy. Monks can tank most mobs given they have decent armor. the downside to monks is the limitation in gear. they only get leather and are very if not extremely limited to certain weapon types. On the really goos hand though a well equiped monk can do just about anything with a healer by his/her side. I love my monk he's a great asset to my shammy and my shammy is a great asset to him. I would reccomend a BL though for 2 reasons. Slows... this is really handy when adding to the fact that your druid can heal a BL/priest class combo would be almost unstoppable. They have great DPS can tank as well as amonk since they wear the same armor and are able to use a few differnt types of weapons so you get a bit more flexability. aslo the BL would have quite a bit of utility that helps you bothe they get almost the same buffs shammy's do minus the really good ones this will help get your stats up so you can be even less gear dependent. If i hadn't had my monk well before the BL was out i'd make one but since i have a shammy i don't really need a BL