Yther wrote:
They must not be doing this any more, or people don't care, and they're not enforcing the multiple-strikes thing in order for them to make such a MOTD. Despite all that, and the MOTD, I don't really care, either. I think the MOTD could of been worded better, but I took it as they were trying to be funny, as previously said.
That's how I took it as well. Just assumed that for some reason they've been getting a lot of petitions from people complaining that they misslooted, or someone looted their drop, etc, and they're tired of getting them. At the end of the day, EQ is a social game. Deal with such things socially. If you're with a group of people raiding and you trust them, and someone makes a mistake, well... they made a mistake. You move on. If the same someone consistently "accidentally" loots something they're not supposed to, you don't invite them to raid anymore. There is pretty close to zero reason to involve the CS on this. The raid tool has long since eliminated the problem of someone outside your own raid ninjalooting items (ok, mostly), so barring an actual game bug occurring, I'm not sure what people expect CS to do here.
fronglo wrote:
I know people hate to hear that dirty three letter word, but the loot system on WOW would fix this problem instantly. Basically allow players who are in the raid to trade the gear for say 2 hours after it is looted. Once that two hours is up it can't be traded ever again.
Trade to/from only people that were in the raid? That might actually work. Would be a bear to program into the game at this point though. And again, you're "fixing" a problem that isn't a game design or bug issue. What's the old saying? The more you idiot proof the world, the more the world will produce idiots? I guarantee you that they'll still get petitions from people who picked up a piece of loot intending to give it to some other player, but then he logged, or crashed, or they forgot to give it to him in the 2 hour window, and pretty please let us trade it now...? Or "so and so won the roll for an uber drop and promised to sell it to me for X pp, but he gave it to someone else instead. Wah!!!".
I got a firm "we're putting our foot down on this silliness" message from that motd. Nothing wrong with that at all IMO.