« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »

Reply To Thread

Post New Benchmark Results!Follow

#52 Aug 01 2013 at 11:18 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1704672984074

Sage

863 posts

I am a little surprised actually, I am getting a second 7970 before release to Crossfire with the one I have, but at maximum settings and 7600x1440 screen size I scored around 3000 with just one card with old drivers. Obviously I wouldn't max out the settings if I were to play with it, I'd rather get better performance, but still impressed it did as well as it did at those resolutions. WIll be interesting to see what another card will do together with updated drivers.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2013 1:20am by Belcrono

#53 Aug 01 2013 at 11:37 PM Rating: Decent

Scholar

1,102 posts

PhrozenFFXI wrote:

AngusX wrote:

PhrozenFFXI wrote:

Still waiting for the PC that I ordered to arrive. My only concern is how this will run with Windows 8. I haven't heard many good things about this version of Windows.

Don't worry about Win 8. There's a learning curve to deal with, but once you know how it works, it plays well.

Good to know. Thanks!

I also use Windows 8 on my laptop and the game runs perfectly fine! I had an issue when I updated to the 8.1 preview, but I honestly think something was corrupted on my pc. Plenty of people play on 8.1 without a problem.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2013 12:49am by Ryklin

____________________________

------------------

#54 Aug 01 2013 at 11:57 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1599437910928

64 posts

silverhope wrote:

Score:9909
Average Framerate:90.226
Performance:Extremely High
AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor 3.3 GHz
16365.242MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series(VRAM 4095 MB)
Screen Size: 1360x768
Screen Mode: Full Screen

Edited, Aug 1st 2013 1:36pm by silverhope

Just using this as an example. One of the best things you can do for your score without lowering your settings is lowering your resolution. I think a lot of people are a little OCD about that 1920x1080 number. 1360x768 is absolutely beautiful, and smooth as silk.

#55 Aug 02 2013 at 12:35 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1616977135271

Sage

923 posts

Score:9591
Average Framerate:84.341
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1680x1050
Screen Mode: Full Screen
Graphics Presets: Maximum

System:
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_gdr.120830-0334)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
8159.949MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.2018

Edited, Aug 2nd 2013 2:35am by samosamo

#56 Aug 02 2013 at 12:38 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1616977262879

Scholar

751 posts

INAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Character Creation)
Tested on:02/08/2013 09:14:03
Score:7282
Average Framerate:61.317
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

creen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
Graphics Presets: Maximum

System:
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130318-1533)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3740QM CPU @ 2.70GHz
32650.309MB
Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.17.0010.2932 Bold TextLies, I have a GXT680M Graphics Card that it is not reading for some reason (no way I could have got this score on an integrated graphics card)Bold Text

#57 Aug 02 2013 at 12:56 AM Rating: Good

Sage

1,675 posts

ScrapTower wrote:

silverhope wrote:

Score:9909
Average Framerate:90.226
Performance:Extremely High
AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor 3.3 GHz
16365.242MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series(VRAM 4095 MB)
Screen Size: 1360x768
Screen Mode: Full Screen

Edited, Aug 1st 2013 1:36pm by silverhope

Just using this as an example. One of the best things you can do for your score without lowering your settings is lowering your resolution. I think a lot of people are a little OCD about that 1920x1080 number. 1360x768 is absolutely beautiful, and smooth as silk.

I'm running 1360x768 because that's the highest my TV goes through VGA.

I'd post the exact numbers but I'm on my phone.

I have a q9550 (oc'd), 6gb of ram and a 550ti and at Max its around 8k (60fps)and with AO turned off (and a couple other things) its around 11k.(100fps)

----

I think I settled on a manqo'te btw; in the RSE they carry themselves a lot like Balthier. Plus Male midlander humes just look too frumpy in most gear and I didn't like any of the Highlanders faces. Maybe I'll mess with it more tomorrow.

#58 Aug 02 2013 at 1:51 AM Rating: Excellent

Guru

1,439 posts

Score:1588
Performance:Slightly low

Screen Size: 1280X720
Screen Mode: Windowed
Graphics Presets: (Standard Laptop)

System:
Windows 7 Professional 32-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3
Intel(r) HD Graphics Family

My works laptop is really not designed for playing this game but it does work!

____________________________

Esuna Forums

[ffxivsig]1229110[/ffxivsig]

#59 Aug 02 2013 at 2:27 AM Rating: Decent

FilthMcNasty

Scholar

4,175 posts

HallieXIV wrote:

Lies, I have a GXT680M Graphics Card that it is not reading for some reason (no way I could have got this score on an integrated graphics card)

Laptops generally switch back and forth as needed between your integrated graphics and the discreet GPU. Can't remember what it's called... maybe optimus? There are ways to get around it, but it requires modified drivers. Not something I recommend unless you're comfortable bricking your laptop if you make a mistake; one that isn't covered by warranty Smiley: glare

____________________________

Rinsui wrote:

Only hips + boobs all day and hips + boobs all over my icecream

HaibaneRenmei wrote:

30 bucks is almost free

cocodojo wrote:

Its personal preference and all, but yes we need to educate WoW players that this is OUR game, these are Characters and not Toons. Time to beat that into them one at a time.

#60 Aug 02 2013 at 4:23 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1714954562163

Sage

618 posts

FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Character Creation)
Tested on:8/2/2013 6:20:07 AM
Score:9002
Average Framerate:80.471
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

System:
Windows 8 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130410-1505)
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
12261.797MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(VRAM 4034 MB) 9.18.0013.1106

Settings
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Enable HDR rendering and improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects. (LOD) : Disabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled
-Real-time Reflections : High
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing) : FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality : High
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Self : Display
-Other NPCs : Display
Shadow Quality
-Use low-detail models on shadows. (LOD) : Disabled
-Shadow Resolution : High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading : Best
-Shadow Softening : Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering : x16
Movement Physics
-Self : Full
-Other NPCs : Full
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : Strong
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled

System:
Windows 8 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130410-1505)
AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
12261.797MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(VRAM 4034 MB) 9.18.0013.1106

Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn will run on your system.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com
(C) 2010-2013 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.

Tweet
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score:9002 1920x1080 Maximum AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

#61 Aug 02 2013 at 5:28 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1599437910928

64 posts

Kierk wrote:

ScrapTower wrote:

silverhope wrote:

Score:9909
Average Framerate:90.226
Performance:Extremely High
AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor 3.3 GHz
16365.242MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series(VRAM 4095 MB)
Screen Size: 1360x768
Screen Mode: Full Screen

Edited, Aug 1st 2013 1:36pm by silverhope

Just using this as an example. One of the best things you can do for your score without lowering your settings is lowering your resolution. I think a lot of people are a little OCD about that 1920x1080 number. 1360x768 is absolutely beautiful, and smooth as silk.

I'm running 1360x768 because that's the highest my TV goes through VGA.

I'd post the exact numbers but I'm on my phone.

I have a q9550 (oc'd), 6gb of ram and a 550ti and at Max its around 8k (60fps)and with AO turned off (and a couple other things) its around 11k.(100fps)

Same here however I'm using HDMI with a 42" on my desk with a native of 1360x768. Personally I can't run a 1080 desktop on your average 24". My eyes start to hurt after a while.

#62 Aug 02 2013 at 5:53 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1602461889342

Scholar

23 posts

Score:26725
Average Framerate:274.669
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
8141.547MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.2049

O.o damn I think I wont have problems xD!!

Edited, Aug 2nd 2013 7:54am by Shynkz

#63 Aug 02 2013 at 6:50 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1638145294571

Guru

1,208 posts

I had a score of 700 or so on my laptop, it said I failed....

Thank GOD for PS3!

#64 Aug 02 2013 at 7:27 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1653869826415

View User Forum

Guru

1,422 posts

ScrapTower wrote:

Kierk wrote:

ScrapTower wrote:

silverhope wrote:

Score:9909
Average Framerate:90.226
Performance:Extremely High
AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor 3.3 GHz
16365.242MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series(VRAM 4095 MB)
Screen Size: 1360x768
Screen Mode: Full Screen

Edited, Aug 1st 2013 1:36pm by silverhope

Just using this as an example. One of the best things you can do for your score without lowering your settings is lowering your resolution. I think a lot of people are a little OCD about that 1920x1080 number. 1360x768 is absolutely beautiful, and smooth as silk.

I'm running 1360x768 because that's the highest my TV goes through VGA.

I'd post the exact numbers but I'm on my phone.

I have a q9550 (oc'd), 6gb of ram and a 550ti and at Max its around 8k (60fps)and with AO turned off (and a couple other things) its around 11k.(100fps)

Same here however I'm using HDMI with a 42" on my desk with a native of 1360x768. Personally I can't run a 1080 desktop on your average 24". My eyes start to hurt after a while.

When I ran beta on my secondary rig it defaulted to 1280x720 max. I played for 6 hours before I noticed when I was in the menus. The game still looked great.

#65 Aug 02 2013 at 7:53 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1627258798740

Sage

336 posts

Anyone tried running this in surround/eyefinity?

I got 4100 at 5860x1080 with max settings
GTX 680 4gb with 326.41 beta driver
16gb DDR3 2x8 RAM
Windows 8 64 bit
i7 3770k 3.5ghz

Wondering if changing drivers would raise my score, nVidia put out a chain of bad ones the past few months.

#66 Aug 02 2013 at 10:08 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1599437910928

64 posts

Westyle wrote:

Anyone tried running this in surround/eyefinity?

I got 4100 at 5860x1080 with max settings
GTX 680 4gb with 326.41 beta driver
16gb DDR3 2x8 RAM
Windows 8 64 bit
i7 3770k 3.5ghz

Wondering if changing drivers would raise my score, nVidia put out a chain of bad ones the past few months.

They have been putting out some sh*t drivers lately haven't they? I think you're better off running beta atm.

I don't know dude... you're rendering 6.3 million pixels at that res. Crazy. Make sure Vsync is off in your control panel. You're definitely not reaching your refresh rate at that score and it would only be slowing you down.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2013 12:08pm by ScrapTower

#67 Aug 02 2013 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1607905045815

Guru

239 posts

So I am scoring around 6100 on high and 5800 on maximum. Do you think keeping my setting at maximum will end up slowing me down? Just worried about if we every get to a situation like Jueno where it takes forever to the are to load?

#68 Aug 02 2013 at 12:59 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1704672984074

Sage

863 posts

Westyle wrote:

Anyone tried running this in surround/eyefinity?

I got 4100 at 5860x1080 with max settings
GTX 680 4gb with 326.41 beta driver
16gb DDR3 2x8 RAM
Windows 8 64 bit
i7 3770k 3.5ghz

Wondering if changing drivers would raise my score, nVidia put out a chain of bad ones the past few months.

I tried it, but it really feels like crossfire/sli would be optimal for it. Like I said in my previous post I got a 3k score @7600x1440 resolution with a 7970 on max settings which is okay for one card, but I don't think I'd want to raid with those stats.

#69 Aug 02 2013 at 1:02 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1707092191686

Sage

1,218 posts

Got only a 1200 on my laptop running high detail at 1920 x 1080. It says "low" but it ran smoothly throughout P3, so I'm guessing it won't be an issue except for raiding or large scale PvP, for which I'll need to use the desktop.

#70 Aug 02 2013 at 1:08 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1599437910928

64 posts

Techsupport wrote:

So I am scoring around 6100 on high and 5800 on maximum. Do you think keeping my setting at maximum will end up slowing me down? Just worried about if we every get to a situation like Jueno where it takes forever to the are to load?

The first thing I would do is turn off AA and turn down the shadows a bit. It would be barely noticeable and keep you running smooth.

#71 Aug 02 2013 at 2:23 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1719792990283

Guru

1,310 posts

ScrapTower wrote:

Techsupport wrote:

So I am scoring around 6100 on high and 5800 on maximum. Do you think keeping my setting at maximum will end up slowing me down? Just worried about if we every get to a situation like Jueno where it takes forever to the are to load?

The first thing I would do is turn off AA and turn down the shadows a bit. It would be barely noticeable and keep you running smooth.

I wouldn't switch off AA unless you were desperate. Not everyone would like their character looking like a pixilated sprite for a minute improvement in performance. Shadows are a good suggestion though. I usually don't like how they get rendered anyway.

#72 Aug 02 2013 at 2:35 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1717978565550

Scholar

3,599 posts

Old PC:

AMD Radeon 5750
Intel 2 Quad Core Duo

3590 MAX
5kish Standard.

All my new computer parts are in the mail though so hopefully next week I can join the cool kids with good numbers.

#73 Aug 02 2013 at 2:38 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1599437910928

64 posts

Pixelated is a bit strong of a word! AA just removes jaggies from edges and honestly I can barely tell the difference in XIV. I don't like turning it off either but it's a pretty significant boost in performance. Try it.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2013 4:39pm by ScrapTower

#74 Aug 02 2013 at 2:38 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1607905045815

Guru

239 posts

Xoie wrote:

ScrapTower wrote:

Techsupport wrote:

So I am scoring around 6100 on high and 5800 on maximum. Do you think keeping my setting at maximum will end up slowing me down? Just worried about if we every get to a situation like Jueno where it takes forever to the are to load?

The first thing I would do is turn off AA and turn down the shadows a bit. It would be barely noticeable and keep you running smooth.

I wouldn't switch off AA unless you were desperate. Not everyone would like their character looking like a pixilated sprite for a minute improvement in performance. Shadows are a good suggestion though. I usually don't like how they get rendered anyway.

thanks for the input, will give that a whirl.

#75 Aug 02 2013 at 3:03 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1599437910928

64 posts

Xoie wrote:

I wouldn't switch off AA unless you were desperate. Not everyone would like their character looking like a pixilated sprite for a minute improvement in performance. Shadows are a good suggestion though. I usually don't like how they get rendered anyway.

I don't think AA is working correctly with ARR anyway. Can you tell the difference? I can't. Both have jaggies on the neck and around the ears.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2013 5:04pm by ScrapTower

#76 Aug 02 2013 at 6:06 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1627258798740

Sage

336 posts

Running at max:
1920x1080: 10300 @ ~90fps
5860x1080: 4100 @ ~35fps

I'd really like to run this in surround, though it looks like I'll be taking a hit. I'll need a new case, motherboard, and PSU to go SLI
Anyone know what price range I'd be looking at?

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »

Reply To Thread

Recent Visitors: 60 All times are in CST

Anonymous Guests (60)

© 2024 Fanbyte LLC