Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Why should I leave Vanguard for LOTRO?Follow

#1 Jun 15 2007 at 12:50 PM Rating: Decent
I'm debating leaving Vanguard for LOTRO. I would greatly appreciate any opinions for or against this. I am a casual gamer who plays about 3-4 hours 2 out of three days. I play pretty late so much of it tends to be solo work in Vanguard.

Thanks
#2 Jun 15 2007 at 1:05 PM Rating: Decent
**
315 posts
I guess it would help to know why you are considering leaving Vanguard? What do you like/dislike about it? What are you looking for in a MMORPG?
#3 Jun 15 2007 at 1:10 PM Rating: Decent
I loved EQ and played from release. Moved to EQ2 and then Back to EQ until Vanguard was released. Vanguard is the perfect MMO in theory for me. It is vast and complex. I am able to play on balanced settings with few problems. Unfortunatly Im getting bored as their are few people playing. Server mergers are looming and Im not sure that will really help much. I love Middle Earth and know it quite well.

Does the game do the books justice?
IS the game detailed or more of a WOW fast leveling type game?

I like to wander and let things happen, explore.
I do enjoy questing as well.

Hope that helps.
#4 Jun 15 2007 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
**
259 posts
LotrO is more similar to WoW than any other MMORPG in the market. At least thats what I would assume, I've only played WoW, LotrO and FFXI.
#5 Jun 15 2007 at 1:26 PM Rating: Decent
The leveling is faster than Vanguard for sure, but the system used to level is different than WoW. You could I suppose just go out and grind mobs but it is exceptionally ineffcient, the fastest and easiest way to level is through the quests, of which there are a substantial amount. And the quests are good ones, yes you have the kill x number of y but there is a good story going along and I have found very few quests that don't have continuations past the original.
#6 Jun 15 2007 at 1:42 PM Rating: Decent
I would love to be swept up in a story while playing. Does the game overdue trying to get you involved in the Ring Bearer/Fellowship of the ring scenario or does it let you just interact with Middle Earth?
#7 Jun 15 2007 at 1:51 PM Rating: Decent
I played the original EQ, EQII, Final fantasy, WOW, Heroes, a few others while wating for Vanguard also.

Player population on Vanguard was nonexistant so I switched to LOTR. I've been a happy camper with LOTR. I wished I would have pd the $200 for lifetime membership.

At least there are a few people playing the game. I quit EQ, EQII, and vanguard because there wasn't enough people playing to do some of the harder quests. So far not many proplems getting a group in LOTR. Listen to the OOC, pay attention to the quests you need, and join groups while soloing or gathering craft items has been fun for me.

In Vanguard I went for days and never found enough people on or interested in grouping. So far the switch for me from Vanguard to LOTR was the right move.

Crafting in Vanguard was way to involved. I think the developers forgot it was a game the idea is to "have fun". Could be the reason for the lower population in Vanguard just wasn't enough fun and way too much like work.

I found myself "trying to convince myself I was having fun playing" as the rewiewers of the game suggested in some of the popular gamming magazine.
#8 Jun 15 2007 at 1:56 PM Rating: Decent
The thing that "sold" me on Vanguard was that it gave me that same feeling I had on the first day of EQ. No other game has ever done that for me. The problem was that that feeling after a short while felt like I had played for seven plus years and was getting bored already. The very thing that attracted me is driving me away. I'm starting to think that LOTRO may be the game with the different experience I need.
#9 Jun 15 2007 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
One other question. Has the Economy been affected by the Gold Sellers/Dupers yet? This is a HUGE problem in Vanguard.
#10 Jun 15 2007 at 2:56 PM Rating: Good
If you are looking for the experience to mirror that of EQ (or Vanguard), keep looking!

LOTRO is an entirely different game designed for a different kind of player.

In LOTRO, you will not find a demanding and unforgiving death penalty. In fact, you will find almost no penalty at all for dying. A short run back from your re-spawn point and a slightly increased repair cost and that's all. There is no corpse run and there is no loss of XP.

You will not find a massive world with zones that can take hours to cross. Although the world is big and the terrain is varied, you will never feel like you are traveling a great and perilous distance to get from say the Southern gates of Bree to the foot of Weathertop. (That trip will take you about 15 minutes on foot or under 5 minutes on horseback!)

You will not find a "mob-grind-based" system that requires you to kill endless numbers of snakes before you graduate to killing countless beetles which will lead you to killing scads of whatever... You will instead find a system which encourages you to quest for the bulk of your XP and kill only what you must to get by. (You will most likely get tired of killing pig, bear and bird... but then we all have!)

You will not find a system which requires you to find a high end "power guild" in order to have a shot at getting armor and weapon drops that are worth wearing. In addition, you will not find a game in which you replace a set of armor at the beginning of a tier and coast till you reach the next tier. What you will find is a system wherein you will see new and interesting drops often and your toon can and will change out individual items of gear as often as you like.

You will not find a system in which crafting is something that must be planned for and done instead of adventuring. You will instead find a system designed to let you craft for a few minutes here or there, whenever you choose, and still make forward motion.

In short, (ok it's way to late for a short answer!), LOTRO is designed to immerse a casual player in Middle Earth and it does so very well. I've been playing since last November and I'm not burned out yet!

If it sounds like that might be something you might enjoy then give it a whirl.
#11 Jun 15 2007 at 2:56 PM Rating: Decent
**
315 posts
Legarion wrote:
One other question. Has the Economy been affected by the Gold Sellers/Dupers yet? This is a HUGE problem in Vanguard.


Not yet. And Turbine seems to be pretty aggressive out of the gate dealing with them - banning accounts, etc.
#12 Jun 15 2007 at 2:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,341 posts
Turbine is/has taken a very active stance against Gold sellers/Buyers. Yeah I said buyers also, few weeks ago they announced they had banned a handful of people caught buying. So far other than greedy people, economy seems ok to me... but I'm use to FFXI in its hayday of gil buying/selling prices....
#13 Jun 15 2007 at 7:56 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,160 posts
This guy says it pretty well

His first reactions to the game were very similar to mine. I first saw LOTRO during a stress test event, and then was lucky enough to get into closed beta. I was hooked from the start. I was a long-time EQ player who had tried DAoC, GW, WoW, ect. and I always came back to EQ. After about a week in closed beta I finally dropped EQ and never felt even the slightest pang of regret. I happily paid my $199 for a lifetime subscription to LOTRO. Heck, the desire to see this game in its full visual glory caused me to finally break new and get a new computer.

Yeah, I'm a fanboi, I freely admit it, but this is the perfect game for me. I can't say if it is for you or not, but I highly recommend it to anyone and everyone.
#14 Jun 18 2007 at 5:06 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Quote:
Why should I leave Vanguard for LOTRO?


You shouldn't. Smiley: wink
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#15 Jun 18 2007 at 6:31 AM Rating: Good
Elinda wrote:
Quote:
Why should I leave Vanguard for LOTRO?


You shouldn't. Smiley: wink


Probably the wrong place to say it, but I wouldn't either.

I'm in largely the same boat as the OP. Vanguard is in theory the perfect game for me. It's huge and immersive and it fosters exploration while providing a real sense of danger and challenge. For all the talk of bugs and performance issues, I've had basically none other than a handfull of of times when I've been booted to desktop. As for what I consider the more frivolous stuff, the graphics are the best I've ever seen in an MMO and likewise for the music. I haven't really played a game with the music turned up since I first started plating EQ, but Vangaurd really has great music. I basically love everything about the game, but the population is so low that I can go hours without seeing another player. Which would make sense if I was out in the wilderness, but even if I hang near some of the civilized areas, there just aren't enough players fillling the massive world.

I've been playing LoTRO with a buddy key here in the past week, and I just can't get into it. I love Tolkien, and I have a love/hate thing with the cut scenes, but I think I know what the problem is. Vanguard has ruined me on most other MMO's. I need the variety of nineteen races and fifteen classes. The graphics are apparently a little more important to me than I thought, because when I play LoTRO I can't help but sort of cringe at the character models and textures. Not to say there aren't some beautiful landscapes in LoTRO, but when I get up close to things I'm reminded how much better VG looks. I can't stand the frantic pace of most games. More than anything, I want a non-linear experience.

With the server merges coming, collapsing thirteen servers into four, I'm hoping for a fix to the population issues VG suffers from. If it doesn't make the world seem more bustling and alive, I may well be done with MMO's for the foreseeable future. I wish I liked LoTRO more, but VG is ruining me for other games.
#16 Jun 18 2007 at 7:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:
I've been playing LoTRO with a buddy key here in the past week [...] The graphics are apparently a little more important to me than I thought, because when I play LoTRO I can't help but sort of cringe at the character models and textures.
The download "buddy key" version has gimped low-res graphics. Just FYI.

That said, if the concept Vanguard seems as if it should be the experience you're craving, you probably won't find LoTRO to be an adequate substitute. They're two games on completely separate tracks.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17 Jun 18 2007 at 8:56 AM Rating: Decent
I have recently left FFXI after having played that, my first online game, for almost 3 years. I gave Vanguard (which my husband is still playing) a try for about 2 weeks; but did not find that I enjoyed it much; and perhaps that is because the style of gameplay is so totally different from FFXI.

Had I given it more time maybe I would still be there; because while there are differences between Vanguard and LOTRO there are similarities in play style that FFXI does not have.

However, and this is getting to the subject Topic, lol, I am, with each passing day becomming totally immersed in LOTRO.

I came to LOTRO cautious; having made many friendship along the way in FFXI; leveled a few jobs to 75, burned out more or less in end-game scene, led a pretty large linkshell there. I wanted to not be pressured, to take time to wander aimlessly, craft, relax; learn the story. LOTRO has allowed me to do all of that. Heck I didn't even joing a Kinship (guild/linkshell) until level 24.

I always thought the detail and graphics in FFXI were unsurpassed; I thought the graphics in Vanguard were beautiful also, but my heart still loved the detail of the FFXI graphics. Friday night, I journeyed further afield for the first time having heard so much about Rivendell from some people in my Kinship who have made their home there now.

I trekked through the Trollshaws with an ingame friend who led me there(didn't die one time either at level 32 :D ) and came upon a most beautiful, graphically mastered sight of Rivendell; rolling hills, waterfalls, meandering paths, and what appeared to be eternal fall foliage blendings - my heart literally skipped a beat!

I now know that I most likely will not return to FFXI.

So, the point of my post is that maybe you should give LOTRO a try and see which you like better?

Most of all; enjoy your journey whatever it may be!

Arriell, Minstrel
level 34
Gladden Server






Edited, Jun 18th 2007 12:59pm by Emmali
#18 Jun 18 2007 at 9:25 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
I played LoTRO during open beta. I worked a Minstrel to level 7 and another hobbit guy to 11 (I dont even recall what class he was, a tank type of some sort).

I had fun, and was spurred on by finishing that next quest.

BT's got it though, I've never felt so 'there' as I do when I play Vanguard. I top a new hill and get apprehenive about what I might find on the other side....and I still find stuff!!

Also I am completely enamoured with my Gnome. She's freakin' adorable, loaded with Gnomish personality and nukes like there is NO tomorrow. Smiley: cool

I agree the games are very different. Vanguard is very much a modernized EQ. LoTRO is more casual friendly perhaps??

I also think I have a hang up with the whole story to game thing with LoTR. The Hobbit was the first novel type book I ever read; followed shortly there after by the trilogy. I lived my fantasy time in Middle Earth, all in my head, for years as a young girl. I'm now thoroughly convinced that I'm not going to someday mysteriously turn a corner and find myself in Middle Earth with my Little Bear bow at my side....and this game isn't going to change that. Smiley: cry

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#19 Jun 18 2007 at 10:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Ironically, a couple of the things that some view as detriments to LoTRO, I'm very happy with.

Smiley: schooled The seven classes are extremely well balanced. Not perfect and Turbine is tweaking but I don't think there's any valid criticism along the lines of "Such-and-such class just sucks" or "This class is way too uber". Very refreshing after the eight year clusterf--k which was EQ's balancing act of 14-16 classes.

Smiley: schooled The world is well populated. Not just with PCs (some might say it's too well populated with PCs when you're looking for ore nodes) but with people, places and things. I'm sure that travelling through vast Karana-like wilderness for an hour is fun for somebody, but I enjoy hitting that next outpost or campsite full of new quests and traders.

Smiley: schooled The quests provide ample direction and reward for completion but you're not tied in. You don't really have to complete most quests. There's major quest lines that I never even touched on my travels through Middle Earth because I outleveled them or just because my path took me another way. But the ones I have hit have been engaging and well worth it in experience (and usually in items).

Smiley: schooled PvMP is fun! Well, it is for me. But I generally hate PvP and to be sucked into a PvP system to the point of neglecting my main really says something. I have to caveat this be saying that there are some major bugs in PvMP right now (all to the detriment of the monster side) and that my server has one of the healthiest balances of Free People & Monster power in the game. Others aren't as lucky. But the nights of defending keeps and following raids, spitting poison and spinning webs as a giant spider, have been fun as all hell.

None of the above are intended as LoTRO > Vanguard statements but rather instances where one man's trash is another man's treasure.

Edited, Jun 18th 2007 1:09pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Jun 18 2007 at 11:54 AM Rating: Decent
There's no better experience than trying it out.

It really is hard to say, even if you prefer your mmorpg's to be more like EQ and Vanguard. Because LotrO is not, it is in many ways a lot like WoW (crafting, buying new skills, death penalty,...).

In a way, I still prefer EQ out of all the mmorpg's I've played. If I had a better computer, I'ld try out Vanguard to be honest.

LotrO is a casual game, with mostly interesting quests that do their job of levelling players and providing them with good armour and weapons. In a way, it's often a bit too fast, levelling up to lvl 20 takes very little time compared to many other games. Not necessarily a bad thing though. You can join in with the main epic story, which is pretty interesting actually (although I haven't done much of that myself), or you can just roam the lands and do the odd quest to keep going.

The game itself isn't really big, but it hasn't bothered me as yet. You come back to the same places often, roam the same zone for quite a bit, but there is plenty of variaty and so far it's enough.

The deeds and achievements are addictive, dangerously so even. Find certain places, kill enough of a certain type of mob, ... and you get a new title or an extra ability or some sort of boost. Very nicely done, even if some of the mobs needed are a bit scarce.

Don't really care much for the death penalty, there basically isn't much of one, unless you die often in a row, that will cost you money, especially later on. (again identical to WoW)

As for the whole Tolkien angle, well, haven't really experienced that all that much as yet. It's fun to talk to Gandalf for instance, or go on a mission with Aragorn, to visit the Shire or stand on Weathertop,... If you follow the epic story line, you encounter such things more. But other than that, it got a lot of added elements as it is a game that has to keep people occupied naturally.

Best advice would be to find a buddy key and try it out. Or if you want to take a little gamble, find the game itself. At least the first 30 days should be free.

Edited to add: I'm only on the Euro server (for some silly reason the new games don't allow global servers anymore, a pity really) but the community is quite good. Yes, there are still pretty infantile players and discussions, but all in all I have little to complain about.



Edited, Jun 18th 2007 11:01pm by Zieveraar
#21 Jun 18 2007 at 2:08 PM Rating: Decent
Thanks for all of the great info! I went ahead and gave LOTRO a shot. I love the world of Tolkien and the game seems to have done it justice without restricting you too much. The quests were well thought out and tied in great with the world of Tolkien. It felt great to be immersed in the environment. Unfortunatly I knew fairly early on that this wasn't going to replace Vanguard for me. This is a great game don't get me wrong...just not what I am looking for. It is fairly linear and not very complex. It is just made for a different gamer than I see myself as. To me it is more along the lines of WOW. Again, not that that is a bad thing. Turbine should be very proud of the product they turned out. I think they hit the target dead on and the game will continue to grow...and grow...and grow. It defintly seems to appeal to a larger market then Vanguard. Believe it or not there are still some of us that enjoy vast expanses to cross on foot as that leads to adventure and discovery. We love a good death penalty as it adds consequence and tension to the fight.

I would give this game a 9.0 if I was a critic as it performs flawlessly and looks beautiful. They knew their audience and created a game that will, in my opinion, become the game of the year easily.

Another thing this game did was get me excited all over again about Vanguard. Vanguard does hit the mark on everything I am looking for, in theory, as another poster stated. I am hopeful that SOE will turn things around and keep the game alive long enough for me to grow weary of it. That should keep me busy for awhile...after all it only took me seven years to tire of EQ1.

Thanks again for all of the info and perhaps we will meet again some day.


Cheers folks,

Hawthorne
22nd Ranger
Telon
#22 Jun 18 2007 at 3:47 PM Rating: Decent
On the lighter side I do have an available Buddy Key if anyone would be interested.
#24 Jun 19 2007 at 7:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I honestly don't see much difference. I've looked for screenshots of Vanguard's character models and wasn't floored but I'm willing to click links if someone has something they think is amazing.

Personally, I think MMORPG character models are hitting that "uncanny valley" where they look less like well-done 3D artwork and more like creepy plasticized versions of real people which generates a negative response in the viewer. The technology wasn't there for older games and WoW avoided it with their intentional cartoon look but this next generation of games is hitting the wall.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Jun 19 2007 at 9:17 AM Rating: Good
Well, I take rather poor screenshots, and I wouldn't call thes amazing, but here's one of my cleric being studly.

Here's another of me standing next to a high elf girlie. It's nighttime in that second pic so I have my torch lit.

I agree about the uncanny valley thing; the VG models look so life-like that the tiniest details can be more destructive immersion-wise than old EQ graphics were. Mostly it's in the facial expressions, I find.

#26 Jun 19 2007 at 9:37 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
It's hard to gauge the characters from still shots, as so much of what makes them 'real' is movement. But here's Purly doing a handstand, and my DSC in battle. Battle graphics are really well done, as are diplomacy actions, harvesting etc.

No doubt LoTR's scenery is beautiful, the characters...um,,,well,,,everyone's legs were too short (specially the hobits), and they ran like dorks. Smiley: blush
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 137 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (137)