Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Good, but overrated gamesFollow

#1 Jun 07 2008 at 11:54 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,359 posts
I've played a few of them recently.. so why not?

God of War - Whenever I heard talk of this game, it was almost always referred to as the best action game ever made. I honestly think that couldn't be further from the truth. Sure it's a good game (and pixelated boobs!) but doesn't deserve nearly the praise it gets. Combat takes little to no planning or thought, and the level of violence is almost so gruesome that it's funny at times, more satirical than serious. Difficulty seems to increase simply by piling on more monsters until you just can't keep up with them all.

Game that does it better: Ninja Gaiden Black

Tales of Symphonia - Is this really the best rpg on the gamecube? (No, no it's not) I do love the game, and can definitely enjoy the story; the characters are pretty lovable and cute and the combat system is decent, but this thing deserves not nearly the level of praise that it gets. Firstly, it seems as if an rpg cliche' exists, then it appears in this game; the story is an amalgam of a ton of already done plot points.

Game that does it better (on the cube no less): Skies of Arcadia Legends

Brawl - This would be the best game that I've ever played if I hadn't been looking forward to it for two years. Maybe anything would be a letdown at that point, but sometimes it's just hard to enjoy. A shame really.
#2 Jun 08 2008 at 2:13 AM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Pensive wrote:
God of War

I will never understand the allure of beat em ups. Most developers have added rpg and puzzle elements to the traditional beat em ups to make them less monotonous. Hint to developers: focus on the features you added to make the game more fun, not the ones you hald realize you pushed aside. To me beat em ups should evolve in to what is essentially a skill based RPG.
Pensive wrote:
Tales of Symphonia

I stopped caring about RPGs released on Nintendo systems around the time of Quest 64 and Aidyn Chronicles. I honestly can't think of another RPG on the Gamecube at the moment.
Pensive wrote:
Brawl

Competitively it's a step back for the series.


Game I'd throw on the list.
Resident Evil - Silent Hill better accentuates the horror and immersion elements of of the genre; fatal frame is also quite remarkable in this.

Devil May Cry - People seem to complain about the difficulty, but I've always found Shinobi to be both more difficult and allowing players more freedom in combat.

Edited, Jun 8th 2008 5:25am by Pride
#3 Jun 08 2008 at 7:03 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
I will never understand the allure of beat em ups. Most developers have added rpg and puzzle elements to the traditional beat em ups to make them less monotonous. Hint to developers: focus on the features you added to make the game more fun, not the ones you hald realize you pushed aside. To me beat em ups should evolve in to what is essentially a skill based RPG.


Like I said, Ninja Gaiden Black is essentially this. It plays like a fighting game and has so many status effects (not like poison and stuff, but like, down, launch, self launch, decapitation, running, landing, etc) and moves that it's just damn beautiful in the amount of ways you can fight sometimes. Start an izuna drop combo and break it before finishing only to land, do a twirlly thing with the sword, gain running status and wind path onto someones head, roll, double back from the roll and throw them from the air... I love it.

You're almost never fighting more than 4 things at once but it's a game in which you really have to plan how you're going to kill the enemies.

Kinda like Zelda really. Zelda with a ton of blood and mature story.
Quote:

I stopped caring about RPGs released on Nintendo systems around the time of Quest 64 and Aidyn Chronicles. I honestly can't think of another RPG on the Gamecube at the moment.


Skies of Arcadia, though it was on the Dreamcast first. It's one of the best i've ever played though.

Edited, Jun 8th 2008 11:05am by Pensive
#4 Jun 08 2008 at 1:43 PM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Heavenly Sword
#5 Jun 08 2008 at 4:26 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
They can call SheGod of War whatever they want, but it's still SheGod of War.
#6 Jun 08 2008 at 5:43 PM Rating: Good
****
5,644 posts
Gears of War, people act like this game was so orignal with its cover system, and they act like its the second coming or something.
#7 Jun 08 2008 at 9:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,359 posts
Thought of another one

Halo

Don't get me wrong, I loved it, but it didn't come close to melting my face off like I was promised it would do, by everyone. I can't deny that it's a good game, but I don't think it deserves the "best game ever" award. One thing that made it shine though was it's soundtrack; I'd buy the CD if I could find it for a reasonable price. Thankfully, I was skeptical going into halo (unlike with God of War) and thus was happily surprised at every turn.
#8 Jun 08 2008 at 11:04 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
MasterOfWar wrote:
Gears of War

Completely agree.
Pensive wrote:
Halo

I specifically avoided mentioning Halo because I felt it wasn't a good enough game to be called "Good, but overrated." Out of all the most popular, recent FPS games Halo is the absolute worst, you'd have start going into low budget productions to find a more terrible game. Combat is sluggish beyond reason. The storyline is enjoyable, but only because it is a copypaste from the most cliche and well loved elements of the scifi genre.
#9 Jun 09 2008 at 12:31 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,359 posts
A good soundtrack can make me look the other way for a great many otherwise poorly implemented features :(

It was one of those games that had just average control and design. With a decent story and characters (Cortana and the cute little psychopathic floating droid) and music, I'd give it around a 6.5-7.
#10 Jun 12 2008 at 9:42 PM Rating: Good
Grand Theft Auto IV

Don't get me wrong. It's still a great game, but there are just to many tiny little flaws to give it a perfect score of 100 out of 100 like it does on many sites and magazines. I like the more serious approach and the fact that they dropped the whole gangsta style. However, I kinda miss the whole epicness of San Andreas. Dropping from a whole state to one (huge) city was kind of a step back for me. I've given it a nice 95/100. Again, it's one of the best games of the past years, but just not perfect.

But I don't agree with the negative reviews made by some users either. Some people seem to have expected that they get a multiple ****** by the sight of each single in-game frame. And now that didn't happen they feel Rockstar has sold out and that GTA-IV is the worst game ever. Also it bugs me that people think GTA-IV doesn't deserve more than a meagre 80 just because the whole game is pretty much the same like the past 3 parts. Seriously, what do they expect? A GTA game where you can catch 150 different criminals with little balls, and use them to fight each other? Or GTA in space with mutant alien flying sharks with frickin' lasers attached to their heads? They have added some small things such as more realism, a friend system, a cover system and improved AI compared to the other games. And yes, you still have to nick cars and shoot people, but did some people honestly expected something else?
#11 Jun 13 2008 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
***
1,025 posts
Pride wrote:

Pensive wrote:
Brawl

Competitively it's a step back for the series.


Of course, you know why this is the case. It falls into the same category as Scarlet Weather Rhaposody, being at its core a fanservice fighting game. Though the Capcom vs SNK and Marvel vs Capcom games don't seem to do poorly in that category. Though it's more likely because the former 2 deviate from the standard fighter formula, so it's more likely to suffer competitively.

But back to the topic at hand.

Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

I've tried playing it many times, and everytime it just feels quite boring and it just sucks the fun out of it for me. Especially the fact that all enemies happen to level up with you.

#12 Jun 13 2008 at 11:41 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,644 posts
Lady Keikomyau wrote:


Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

I've tried playing it many times, and everytime it just feels quite boring and it just sucks the fun out of it for me. Especially the fact that all enemies happen to level up with you.

base oblivion i agree, but are you playing the pc version?

theres some pretty sweet mods, including one i think that does away with the level scaling.
#13 Jun 13 2008 at 12:03 PM Rating: Good
***
1,025 posts
MasterOfWar wrote:
Lady Keikomyau wrote:


Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

I've tried playing it many times, and everytime it just feels quite boring and it just sucks the fun out of it for me. Especially the fact that all enemies happen to level up with you.

base oblivion i agree, but are you playing the pc version?

theres some pretty sweet mods, including one i think that does away with the level scaling.


I own the PC version, so I think I'll have to look into that.

I really do hope Fallout 3 will be good though.
#14 Jun 13 2008 at 4:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Lady Keikomyau wrote:
Of course, you know why this is the case. It falls into the same category as Scarlet Weather Rhaposody, being at its core a fanservice fighting game. Though the Capcom vs SNK and Marvel vs Capcom games don't seem to do poorly in that category. Though it's more likely because the former 2 deviate from the standard fighter formula, so it's more likely to suffer competitively.

I don't think it's fair to call Smash Bros. a fan service fighting game, because that is not really it's most defining feature. It certainly services the fans, but the engine and game play are radically different from most every popular fighter, both 2d and 3d.

Oblivion most definitely fits the topic.
#15 Jun 13 2008 at 5:34 PM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
**
820 posts
Call of Duty 4, alot worse on PC than Console, but still rather disappointing.

One massively underrated game is S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadows of Chernobyl - there's so much to do in that, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky is just jaw dropping. (There's a video of the technical graphics and stuff on Steam - really got me excited.
#16 Jun 13 2008 at 6:05 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,975 posts
Final Fantasy VII.



I know. I'll probably get defaulted. But honestly, nothing about this game absolutely floored me. Granted, it was a big advancement as far as game mechanics is concerned, but I honestly don't understand the church of Sephiroth that seems to have arisen.

The characters were okay, and the story was pretty good, but I'd be willing to say that some of the games following in the series did it better. I know I personally liked the stories in eight and nine better, and nine certainly had a somewhat more polished battle system. (Hell, even X-2 had a really good system based on the mechanics that were developed in VII.)



So basically, game that does it better: Final Fantasy VIII, IX, X-2.
#17 Jun 13 2008 at 11:33 PM Rating: Good
***
1,025 posts
Allegory wrote:
Lady Keikomyau wrote:
Of course, you know why this is the case. It falls into the same category as Scarlet Weather Rhaposody, being at its core a fanservice fighting game. Though the Capcom vs SNK and Marvel vs Capcom games don't seem to do poorly in that category. Though it's more likely because the former 2 deviate from the standard fighter formula, so it's more likely to suffer competitively.

I don't think it's fair to call Smash Bros. a fan service fighting game, because that is not really it's most defining feature. It certainly services the fans, but the engine and game play are radically different from most every popular fighter, both 2d and 3d.


True, but it's not like I'm saying Fanservice Fighters are a bad thing. However, it is hard to deny that its a major defining feature, its the major reason it has such an appeal to such a broad amount of people. It essentially brings in a larger base of competitive players. A doujin game like Melty Blood for instance would never be at a major tournament level if it werent for its Type/Moon roots and the significant fanbase it had.

On another note, you should try to get a copy of Scarlet Weather Rhapsody and try it out, I need people to play against and the people from 4chan tend to scare me. It's not a standard fighter either.

A demo of the game is here: http://tasofro.net/touhou105/index.html
Download Link is in the blue box on this page: http://tasofro.net/touhou105/download.html

You'll need a full version for network play if you do happen to enjoy it. Don't feel guilty about torrenting it either, I guarantee maybe one or two people outside of myself actually bought the game Smiley: glare, outside of Japan that is.
#18 Jun 14 2008 at 12:00 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I know. I'll probably get defaulted. But honestly, nothing about this game absolutely floored me. Granted, it was a big advancement as far as game mechanics is concerned, but I honestly don't understand the church of Sephiroth that seems to have arisen.

The characters were okay, and the story was pretty good, but I'd be willing to say that some of the games following in the series did it better. I know I personally liked the stories in eight and nine better, and nine certainly had a somewhat more polished battle system. (Hell, even X-2 had a really good system based on the mechanics that were developed in VII.)


Blasphemer!

But seriously, I've heard more people state this. Although the fanbase for the VII is pretty big (and I'm one of them, VII is still my favourite console game to date), some state that the older ones are better, some that the IX is better. Story wise, I would say that the VII is much better than the X, X-2 or XII. Some would dispute about the IX, mostly because it has a more fantasy feel to it I suppose.

As for the
Church of Sephiroth


#19 Jun 14 2008 at 1:32 PM Rating: Decent
ff7 is pretty mediocre all around.

ff10 is even superior to 7.

4 and 6 pretty much win at life.

8 had a lot going for it, and could have potentially been the best FF ever had they not screwed up everything by the end of disc 1.
#20 Jun 14 2008 at 2:01 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
8 had a lot going for it, and could have potentially been the best FF ever had they not screwed up everything by the end of disc 1.


The 8 did have the toughest or easiest, depending on how you played it, endfight in all the FF stories.

It got a lot of criticism for it's drawing system, which imo was even better than the battle system in FF VII.
#21 Jun 14 2008 at 3:14 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Just started playing 6 on GBA, liking it so far (only an hour in tho). Had 9 going on an emulator for a couple months, only recently picked it back up tho, don't play it too often but I like the story so far.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#22 Jun 14 2008 at 3:30 PM Rating: Decent
Zieveraar wrote:
Quote:
8 had a lot going for it, and could have potentially been the best FF ever had they not screwed up everything by the end of disc 1.


The 8 did have the toughest or easiest, depending on how you played it, endfight in all the FF stories.

It got a lot of criticism for it's drawing system, which imo was even better than the battle system in FF VII.


8 had a raw, lifeless, industrial feel about it. It focused more on character relationships and small quirky things which eventually spread out into something like a story. It really could have been something special if they had thought it all through a bit more.
#23 Jun 14 2008 at 3:55 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,644 posts
i thought 8 was good, but i can see why some might not like it.

had great music though.

#24 Jun 14 2008 at 10:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Keeper of the Shroud
*****
13,632 posts
Zieveraar wrote:
Quote:
8 had a lot going for it, and could have potentially been the best FF ever had they not screwed up everything by the end of disc 1.


The 8 did have the toughest or easiest, depending on how you played it, endfight in all the FF stories.

It got a lot of criticism for it's drawing system, which imo was even better than the battle system in FF VII.


Eww, the drawing system in VIII was probably the single worst battle system in any FF game. All you had to do to annihilate anything in your path was max out on the strongest spells and melee stuff into the ground. The story was also a steaming pile. It had some potential in the beginning but by the end it was just crap, it didn't even make sense. I mean really, what the hell did Ultimicia want to compress time for again?
#25 Jun 17 2008 at 8:56 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
mmmm

Man with the Machine Gun
Eyes on Me
The Extreme
Liberi Fatali
Force You're Way

Yeah it did have a fantastic soundtrack, but that's par for the course for most final fantasies.
#26 Jun 19 2008 at 8:02 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,632 posts
Eight is definitely my least favorite FF by far. It felt like one big deus ex machina, especially when you get into the whole orphanage business... And I hate, hate, hated the draw system, and the fact that there's no armor and only a few weapons that are nigh-impossible to obtain. Not to mention that the battles were pretty much nothing but watching the GF cinematics over and over again.

As for 7, when it was released it was quite possibly the greatest RPG of all time. But nostalgia has not treated it nearly as well as, say, 4-6. Kefka will never be replaced in my heart.

Ten had my favorite battle system by far, provided you don't abuse the Aeon overdrive trick for the bosses... :P
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 277 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (277)