Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

HealthFollow

#1 Apr 09 2007 at 12:18 PM Rating: Decent
It's me...again. I was thinking a while back and i wondered something;does my guy have good health? I'm level 23 with 1158 WITHOUT buffs.
#2 Apr 09 2007 at 2:23 PM Rating: Decent
**
842 posts
i don't remember how much health i had at that level, but that sounds about right. if you have stam+ on every piece of gear then you should be in good shape health-wise.
#3 Apr 09 2007 at 2:24 PM Rating: Good
****
8,779 posts
thats a pretty broad question. at a glance, id say yes, but the early levels are very trivial so to speak. as long as youre focusing on stam as one of your primary stats, your health will always be classified as "good" for the entirety of your warrior career.

id like to give you a better answer, but the stats of an early level character fluctuate so much, and there are so many possible builds....its just hard to say what "good" health is. the big question is, does it work for you?
#4 Apr 10 2007 at 2:40 PM Rating: Decent
*
199 posts
a good gauge is to compare it to other classes at your level ..

if you join a group to instance/quest and the hunter or rogue (same level) has more hp than you, then you know your pretty badly off lol

warriors tend to have the most hp in most cases (except when there is a tanky drood around eh?)

the only exception to this might be end game dps warriors who sacrifice stam for dps
but you wont have to worry about that for a while
#5 Apr 10 2007 at 2:46 PM Rating: Decent
http://armory.worldofwarcraft.com/#character-sheet.xml?r=Spirestone&n=Boomshicky

I only have 873 health, and I do just fine(i'm in hilsbrad) i focused mainly on strength, just taking stamina as secondary
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 73 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (73)