Quote:
i don't understand "There are classes much more suited for DPS". i did out-dps them. therefore i am much more suited for dps. unfortunately they are ONLY dps.
Yes, you are talking about who? Yourself! Your skills only. I will not doubt for a second that you are a great Ret. Paladin and can realize the paladin to its fullest potential. But alas its just you, not the whole class. You may DPS better then a warlock or hunter, but that is because you outskill them. Now if we had each class played to its fullest potential Paladins would just be straight out beat by everything else.
I am very tempted to say that pallies have the worse DPS tree out of all classes. But of course Ret Paladins can do DPS. Its what they're specc-ed for! But they just pale in comparison to the other classes.
Quote:
question is: why not take 3 Ret pallies for dps. if the pally can out-dps the warlock/hunter AND withstand more dmg AND cast 2 stuns per min AND prevent wipe AND heal themselves AND increase the parties utility AND bounce aggro as needed?
Druids, Shamans, and Warlocks can pretty much do all that. Whats your point? A feral druid has alot more DPS then a paladin yet he can Battle Rez healer if he dies, tank better then any Ret. pally, and has about 4 stuns.
Shamans have totems that boost utility to the max, can heal, rez THEMSELVES for anti-wipe. Only thing is that they dont have any stuns.
Warlock can off-tank with pet, heal themselves incase healers busy, prevents wipe by soul-stoning rezzer, and has MASSIVE DPS.
So yea, maybe those are a couple reasons why poeple will not take 3 Ret. Pallies over every other DPS/Hybrid class