Quote:
Did you every hear of Quantum Philosophy?.. which says that experiments are usally Flawed because of the fact that WE are interfereing with the results with our mere presence?
Yes, I have heard of it, and no, that isn't what it says. In fact, you are probably thinking of some garbled version of the Heisenberg Principle.
Do you think scientists aren't aware of these effects? Do you think we don't construct elaborate controls to make sure these things are eliminated, or at least minimized? If you think the homing experiments are wrong (and if you succeed in finding something wrong with them, you'll be famous- they have stood the test of time) you are going to have to be mighty specific. Make reference to the actual methods, please. No hand-waving allowed.
Very nice that you posted these things about magnetic orientation in animals. It's been well known for at least 40 years. And so what? Again, no hocus-pocus mumbo jumobo New Age junk is required to explain this. This stuff was in my first-year biology text (by William Keeton, btw, of Cornell, who pioneered work on homing in birds). The problem is that magnetic orientation is even less precise than stellar orientation. Blinded pigeons that are tracked can get to within a hundred miles of their home point, but not much better. Pigeons with Helmholtz coils attached to their heads (which blank out the magnetic field) do just fine.
Congratulations of the pineal gland btw. But what makes you think it's a third eye? The pineal secretes melatonin, which regulates your sleep cycles. It also influences biorythms, and might play a role in timing of menstrual cycles. To do this it has to collect information on light/dark cycles, true, but so what? Why make it sound oooooohhhh mysterious? I ask again- so what? These are not completely understood, but there's nothing mystical about physiology.