Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Value SizeFollow

#27 Oct 20 2010 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Kaain wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
It makes me laugh when people order anything other than a small when they're in a place with free refills

Or anything but water when you fill your cup yourself.
If the water comes out of the same spout as one of the pop/juices, no thanks. Disgusting. You ever take one of those apart and clean it? It's like pulling out silly string, but you know it's not silly string.


They're supposed to remove the nozzles and soak them in bleach water every night before close. I'm not surprised that most places don't, however.
#28 Oct 20 2010 at 11:25 AM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
BrownDuck wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Kaain wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
It makes me laugh when people order anything other than a small when they're in a place with free refills

Or anything but water when you fill your cup yourself.
If the water comes out of the same spout as one of the pop/juices, no thanks. Disgusting. You ever take one of those apart and clean it? It's like pulling out silly string, but you know it's not silly string.


They're supposed to remove the nozzles and soak them in bleach water every night before close. I'm not surprised that most places don't, however.
I wasn't talking about the nozzle, I mean in the lines themselves.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#29 Oct 20 2010 at 12:51 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Almalieque wrote:
So,I've been out of the country for a while and I noticed the change in the standard value meal sizes. A small is now a medium, a medium is now a large and a large is now the signature XL size. It's really annoying, because I'm so used to saying "medium", but I end up getting a "large".

I know McDonalds got rid of the Super Size awhile back, but they didn't change the names of the sizes. Also I didn't hear anything about this with every other fast food joint, Burger King, Wendy's, etc.

Anyone have a clue?


Well, large companies in general have been making a habit of reducing their product and selling it for the same price in order to save money.

Anyone who works or spends a lot of time in a grocery store will notice this a lot. Often times the package will remain the same size, but if you read the label it will have less on the inside.

Along with this, I have found that they are cutting costs under the guise of going "green" and making their packaging, and the product itself, out of cheaper low grade materials.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#30 Oct 20 2010 at 12:58 PM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
What you're talking about Kuwoobie is the opposite of what Alma's saying.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#31 Oct 20 2010 at 1:11 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
What you're talking about Kuwoobie is the opposite of what Alma's saying.


Hmm, maybe I just can't understand what Alma is saying.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#32 Oct 20 2010 at 1:29 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
Kuwoobie wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
What you're talking about Kuwoobie is the opposite of what Alma's saying.


Hmm, maybe I just can't understand what Alma is saying.
Ebonics takes some getting used to.
#33 Oct 20 2010 at 3:38 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Allegory wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
You don't understand what I'm saying. The meal is the exact same. The advertised meal didn't change, the size didn't change and there was no significant change in price, only the name of the meal changed. That's my point. For example, instead of having small, medium, large and XL, the names were changed to extra tiny, normal, gigantic and ginormous. The only thing changed were the names of the meals, which is no big deal, but if you're so used to ordering a "medium" and now the size of a medium is "gigantic" as opposed to being "normal", that will throw you off. This is because you are more likely to connect medium with normal than you would medium to gigantic.

No, I understand exactly what you're saying, which is apparent by your clarification being a repetition of what I've said.


If you do understand, then your post doesn't represent your claim given the fact that you were talking about actual change in sizes when I was just simply talking about the change in names. Since you said it was only McDonalds, when clearly Burger King and Wendy's at a minimum have done the same thing, I question your claim.

But nice try.. It's ok to be wrong, no need to try to "talk yourself out of it". It's not even possible in this scenario.

Belkira wrote:

It's frustrating, because I think everyone understands and has addressed what he's saying, but he's got a persecution complex or something. We just don't undrestand anything he's going through.


Everyone except Allegory.

Just like Ugly said, it's not about content, simply my name..
#34 Oct 20 2010 at 4:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Why? Short answer: Market research told them they'd make more money this way.

Long answer: Market research told them they'd make more money this way.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#35 Oct 20 2010 at 4:18 PM Rating: Good
Almalieque wrote:
Everyone except Allegory.


I disagree. Allegory got it. Kuwoobie didn't, but, well, it's Kuwoobie. I kid!

Edited, Oct 20th 2010 5:19pm by Belkira
#36 Oct 20 2010 at 5:09 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Almalieque wrote:
If you do understand, then your post doesn't represent your claim given the fact that you were talking about actual change in sizes when I was just simply talking about the change in names.

Those are the same things.

Pretend I have 4 sizes: a 16oz small, 20oz medium, 24oz large, and 28oz megahuge. I now move each of the names down a tier: 16oz junior, 20oz small, 24oz medium, 28oz large. Customers still have the same expectations about what the words small, medium, and large mean. I expect a medium to be the Goldilocks amount--not too much and not too little--regardless of what that actual amount is. In only renaming the existing options average sales will increase, because some of the customers who bought the old medium will now jump to the new medium believing it to still be the amount they want--and the same is true for customers of each size category. There is a size creep in what is sold.

Additionally, companies also often use the opportunity to introduce new or remove old size categories. It is also possible that I discontinue the 16oz smallest size and/or possibly add a new 32oz extra large size. Here there is a size creep in what is offered.

This is one method by which portions have crept up over the last few decades, which is the topic I thought your question was a lead-in to, instead of being simply about the fascinating topic of name changes of cups.

Edited, Oct 20th 2010 6:11pm by Allegory
#37 Oct 20 2010 at 6:17 PM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Allegory wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If you do understand, then your post doesn't represent your claim given the fact that you were talking about actual change in sizes when I was just simply talking about the change in names.

Those are the same things.

Pretend I have 4 sizes: a 16oz small, 20oz medium, 24oz large, and 28oz megahuge. I now move each of the names down a tier: 16oz junior, 20oz small, 24oz medium, 28oz large. Customers still have the same expectations about what the words small, medium, and large mean. I expect a medium to be the Goldilocks amount--not too much and not too little--regardless of what that actual amount is. In only renaming the existing options average sales will increase, because some of the customers who bought the old medium will now jump to the new medium believing it to still be the amount they want--and the same is true for customers of each size category. There is a size creep in what is sold.

Additionally, companies also often use the opportunity to introduce new or remove old size categories. It is also possible that I discontinue the 16oz smallest size and/or possibly add a new 32oz extra large size. Here there is a size creep in what is offered.

This is one method by which portions have crept up over the last few decades, which is the topic I thought your question was a lead-in to, instead of being simply about the fascinating topic of name changes of cups.

Edited, Oct 20th 2010 6:11pm by Allegory



I read this post and your first post as totally different, but if you claim that you had the same thought, then I'm not going to argue that you didn't, because it doesn't matter. Mostly of what you just said is what I was thinking as I stated in my previous posts.
#38 Oct 20 2010 at 6:29 PM Rating: Good
Allegory wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If you do understand, then your post doesn't represent your claim given the fact that you were talking about actual change in sizes when I was just simply talking about the change in names.

Those are the same things.

Pretend I have 4 sizes: a 16oz small, 20oz medium, 24oz large, and 28oz megahuge. I now move each of the names down a tier: 16oz junior, 20oz small, 24oz medium, 28oz large. Customers still have the same expectations about what the words small, medium, and large mean. I expect a medium to be the Goldilocks amount--not too much and not too little--regardless of what that actual amount is. In only renaming the existing options average sales will increase, because some of the customers who bought the old medium will now jump to the new medium believing it to still be the amount they want--and the same is true for customers of each size category. There is a size creep in what is sold.

Additionally, companies also often use the opportunity to introduce new or remove old size categories. It is also possible that I discontinue the 16oz smallest size and/or possibly add a new 32oz extra large size. Here there is a size creep in what is offered.

This is one method by which portions have crept up over the last few decades, which is the topic I thought your question was a lead-in to, instead of being simply about the fascinating topic of name changes of cups.

Edited, Oct 20th 2010 6:11pm by Allegory


I just like it when Allegory gets analytical and focuses on the details.
#39 Oct 20 2010 at 8:01 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
I think you're in the minority.
#40 Oct 20 2010 at 8:15 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
False.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#41 Oct 20 2010 at 8:38 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
False.
This
#42 Oct 20 2010 at 8:41 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Allegory wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If you do understand, then your post doesn't represent your claim given the fact that you were talking about actual change in sizes when I was just simply talking about the change in names.

Those are the same things.

Pretend I have 4 sizes: a 16oz small, 20oz medium, 24oz large, and 28oz megahuge. I now move each of the names down a tier: 16oz junior, 20oz small, 24oz medium, 28oz large. Customers still have the same expectations about what the words small, medium, and large mean. I expect a medium to be the Goldilocks amount--not too much and not too little--regardless of what that actual amount is. In only renaming the existing options average sales will increase, because some of the customers who bought the old medium will now jump to the new medium believing it to still be the amount they want--and the same is true for customers of each size category. There is a size creep in what is sold.

Additionally, companies also often use the opportunity to introduce new or remove old size categories. It is also possible that I discontinue the 16oz smallest size and/or possibly add a new 32oz extra large size. Here there is a size creep in what is offered.

This is one method by which portions have crept up over the last few decades, which is the topic I thought your question was a lead-in to, instead of being simply about the fascinating topic of name changes of cups.

Edited, Oct 20th 2010 6:11pm by Allegory



I read this post and your first post as totally different, but if you claim that you had the same thought, then I'm not going to argue that you didn't, because it doesn't matter. Mostly of what you just said is what I was thinking as I stated in my previous posts.


I do believe it is what he meant in his original post.

____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#43 Oct 20 2010 at 10:02 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I know that's how I read it.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#44 Oct 21 2010 at 1:35 AM Rating: Good
Timelordwho wrote:
Why? Short answer: Market research told them they'd make more money this way.

Long answer: Market research told them they would make more money this way.


FTFY.
#45 Oct 21 2010 at 8:31 AM Rating: Good
***
2,346 posts
I skimmed a lot of posts because I was too lazy to read them all. So if I said something that's already been said...oh well.

With my experience I haven't noticed size/name getting any bigger. Well I haven't been to McDonalds in a while so I don't know about them. McDonalds used to always give a 24 oz. medium and a 32 oz. large. Whether that has changed I don't know. Wendys and Taco Bell on the other hand have always given a 32 oz. medium and I believe a 40 oz. large. It's just always been like that since I've been going.

As for prices I used to go to McDonalds also and get the exact same thing. The price used to be $4.75. After awhile I noticed I was paying more, around $5.15, and so on over the years it kept increasing. Though I never had an increase in portion size or anything else.

Some places I believe offer a tiny bit of savings getting the meal as opposed to getting things separately. As someone stated though Taco Bell's meals are the exact same price as ordering everything individually. Probably just for more an ease of ordering stuff.

I don't know what I'm really trying to say, just babbling my experiences.
#46 Oct 21 2010 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
****
4,901 posts
I'm going to hold back my opinion until this thing's on page 17.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#47 Oct 22 2010 at 6:44 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Hyolith wrote:
With my experience I haven't noticed size/name getting any bigger. Well I haven't been to McDonalds in a while so I don't know about them. McDonalds used to always give a 24 oz. medium and a 32 oz. large. Whether that has changed I don't know. Wendys and Taco Bell on the other hand have always given a 32 oz. medium and I believe a 40 oz. large. It's just always been like that since I've been going.


How old are you though? There absolutely has been "size creep" of the sort both Allegory and Alma are talking about (whether they agree that's what they're talking about or not is subject to much philosophical confuzzlemnet though!). When I was a child, a "small" cup was typically about 8oz. A medium was 12 and a large was 16.

When I was a teen, 12 was small, 16 was medium, 20 was large, and some places had XL which was the ridiculous size of 24oz! OMG!

As I got into my mid 20s, 16 was small, 20 was medium, and 24 was large, XL was 30 or 32oz. Absolutely ridiculous of course!

Today, it's not uncommon for 16-20oz to be "small", 24-30oz to be "medium", 34-40oz to be "large", and something ridiculous like 64oz to be "extra large". To say that sizes have changed is an understatement.

The reason is "what Joph said". The cost for an extra 4oz of actual soda is like a penny. But they can charge an extra 20 cents for it (because people will pay more for more, duh!). If you keep the names the same, people will keep ordering the "medium" because that sounds like a "normal" amount to buy. If you just increase the size (and cost!) of "medium", people will order it anyway and most of them wont notice that they're now getting a soda the size of a large and for the price of a large. They just order medium because that's what they always order and don't realize that they're getting kinda ripped off. Ok. Not just "kinda" either.

Quote:
As for prices I used to go to McDonalds also and get the exact same thing. The price used to be $4.75. After awhile I noticed I was paying more, around $5.15, and so on over the years it kept increasing. Though I never had an increase in portion size or anything else.


Some of that (most of it if you're talking about straight food orders) is inflation. Some of it is market research. The research shows that most people will order a combo off the menu and will just accept that it costs X amount more than it used to without really paying attention to how much more. The combo tends to include one main "thing" (burger for example), a side dish (fries, onion rings, etc), and a drink. So they're instantly ******** you for the drink (and some of the combo increase is because they come with the medium drink which today is the size and price of 5 years ago's large).

The other aspect of this is that they know that a percentage of people will avoid the combos and look only for the best deals. And that those two types of people are distinct. Thus, they'll offer great single item prices to attract that second group and pass on the cost to the combo meals. That way they get business from both groups.

Quote:
Some places I believe offer a tiny bit of savings getting the meal as opposed to getting things separately. As someone stated though Taco Bell's meals are the exact same price as ordering everything individually. Probably just for more an ease of ordering stuff.


Believe it or not, despite comments to the contrary, most of the time if you add up the prices of the individual items in a combo it will cost more than the combo. That's by design. The key to recognize is that those items themselves are overpriced to make the "value items" on the menu relatively cheaper. You are vastly better off ordering several items off the dollar menu than a single item that costs X dollars. You're also better off not ordering a drink (for several reasons).

When I was younger I used to always order the combo meals. Most places had simpler/smaller sets of menus and the combos were cheaper and actually a good deal (sorta). I don't eat fast food very often now, but when I do I pretty much always order off the dollar/value menu if one is there. The other stuff is ridiculously overpriced relatively speaking. Order a bunch of small/cheap items. Don't get a drink. Don't buy fries. Your wallet and your gut will thank you!


Or... Buy real food and cook it yourself.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#48 Oct 22 2010 at 6:53 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
gbaji wrote:
Or... Buy real food and cook it yourself.

Sometimes I make myself soda soup. I get a two liter bottle of Dr. Pepper, pour it into a pot, and then drink it with a ladle. It's a simple recipe, but one you can eat over an over again.
#49 Oct 22 2010 at 7:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Believe it or not, despite comments to the contrary, most of the time if you add up the prices of the individual items in a combo it will cost more than the combo. That's by design. The key to recognize is that those items themselves are overpriced to make the "value items" on the menu relatively cheaper.

That doesn't make sense. Most items on the dollar menu are loss leaders. I don't know if it still applies but I read before someone from Wendy's stating that if you order a dollar burger and a dollar fries, Wendy's loses fifty cents. If you get a drink with that, they squeeze out some slight profit but saying that they're intentionally overpricing their regular menu items to entice you to buy items they sell at a loss is... ummm...

Well, it doesn't make sense.

Ah, found a cite saying about the same basic thing:
Quote:
Pricing on Wendy's Super Value Menu varies by market, said franchisee Dave Norman, who leads the Wendy's Old Fashioned Franchise Association.

"We all try to be price-sensitive to our markets and are competitive instead of adhering to a single price point," he said. "We lose money selling almost anything at 99 cents but can hope that it's a traffic driver. We hope they will buy other things so it will be a profitable transaction. If they buy one 99-cent item and ask for a cup of water, we lose 25 [percent] to 30 percent on that sale."


Edited, Oct 22nd 2010 8:47pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#50 Oct 22 2010 at 8:10 PM Rating: Default
Every time this thread gets bumped I keep reading the subject and thinking it's Alma talking about the size of his ****.
#51 Oct 22 2010 at 8:12 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
That was a cheap shot, and not funny enough to warrant being said.

Edited, Oct 22nd 2010 9:13pm by Allegory
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 280 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (280)