idiggory wrote:
You started a paragraph with a sentence on one topic and then proceeded to discuss a different one. Why is that so hard to comprehend?
Because you're wrong maybe? The second paragraph was an explanation as to why the action(s) described in the first paragraph did not support Joph's claim. I've explained this to you three times now, but you still don't get it. Heck, the two parts of that paragraph were even about the same sort of thing (why I didn't google for the reason Joph claimed, followed by a couple sentences explaining the actual reason).
You honestly couldn't follow that? And yeah, this has to be the dumbest argument ever. Are you now still confused about what I wrote? No? Then why the hell keep arguing? You asked. I explained. We kinda should be done now, right?