Mazra wrote:
I get that 0-100 is a nice scale for mathematically challenged people, but come on. You're taught negative numbers in first grade. Why not use them?
By that argument no scale is better or worse than any other. We could peg 0 at the temperature that bacon grease congeals and 100 at the temperature of a mongoose fart, and it would be just as useful.
So we're left with a choice between not caring about whether the numbers are arbitrary, in which case Fahrenheit and Celsius are equal (as are any randomly chosen scale for that matter), or we decide we actually do care about the numbers having some relevance to human perception of hot/cold, in which case Fahrenheit is superior.
So basically, if we don't care what we use, they're the same, but if we do, then Fahrenheit is superior. Are we agreed on this?