Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Can I ask why this image was removed?Follow

#27 Oct 03 2007 at 6:49 AM Rating: Good
Prom Queen NixNot wrote:
Imperial Ninja wrote:
If it was in =10 I would have taken it down as well.

IIRC this was the post that it was in.


And "lolgaxe" can have that particular avatar in =10? Smiley: dubious
#28 Oct 03 2007 at 1:36 PM Rating: Good
is Happy on Friday!
Avatar
*****
12,448 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Prom Queen NixNot wrote:
Imperial Ninja wrote:
If it was in =10 I would have taken it down as well.

IIRC this was the post that it was in.


And "lolgaxe" can have that particular avatar in =10? Smiley: dubious


pssssst

shaddap :P

truthfully though, as a poster that is honestly much younger than most others here, i can say with high certainty that the swear word semi-ban is unneeded, unless of course you mean it as pertaining to people who's kid's read the forums, in which case i understand, but still

8 year olds swear more than most of the posters here(meaning more often)
____________________________
Theytak, Siren Server, FFXI [Retired]
Amerida Baker, Balmung Server, FFXIV
LOLGAXE IS MY ETERNAL RIVAL!

Reiterpallasch wrote:
Glitterhands wrote:
Am I the only one who clicked on this thread expecting actual baby photos [of Jinte]? o.O

Except if it were baby photos, it would be like looking at before and afters of Michael Jackson. Only instead of turning into a white guy, he changes into a chick!
#29 Oct 03 2007 at 1:37 PM Rating: Good
Jinte wrote:
pssssst

shaddap :P


Smiley: lol
#30 Oct 04 2007 at 3:39 AM Rating: Good
Jinte wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Prom Queen NixNot wrote:
Imperial Ninja wrote:
If it was in =10 I would have taken it down as well.

IIRC this was the post that it was in.


And "lolgaxe" can have that particular avatar in =10? Smiley: dubious


pssssst

shaddap :P

truthfully though, as a poster that is honestly much younger than most others here, i can say with high certainty that the swear word semi-ban is unneeded, unless of course you mean it as pertaining to people who's kid's read the forums, in which case i understand, but still

8 year olds swear more than most of the posters here(meaning more often)
I don't think they are so much worried about saving the children as they are about how a parent or advertiser would view the site. I'm cool with it. I'm actually thankful for the mayhem that we can get away with in OOT and what not.
#31 Oct 04 2007 at 6:17 AM Rating: Decent
is Happy on Friday!
Avatar
*****
12,448 posts
Quote:
I don't think they are so much worried about saving the children as they are about how a parent or advertiser would view the site.

and the add's for **** videos and dating sites(the one's with scantily clad women) are any better?
____________________________
Theytak, Siren Server, FFXI [Retired]
Amerida Baker, Balmung Server, FFXIV
LOLGAXE IS MY ETERNAL RIVAL!

Reiterpallasch wrote:
Glitterhands wrote:
Am I the only one who clicked on this thread expecting actual baby photos [of Jinte]? o.O

Except if it were baby photos, it would be like looking at before and afters of Michael Jackson. Only instead of turning into a white guy, he changes into a chick!
#32 Oct 05 2007 at 9:31 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
and the add's for **** videos and dating sites(the one's with scantily clad women) are any better?


One of the main reasons I ended up renewing my premium. I can't get away with installing Fire Fox on my work PC. That and I'd rather not have to explain what site I am looking at in a memo just because someone catches a glance of my screen.
#33 Oct 08 2007 at 11:20 PM Rating: Good
***
2,374 posts
Kyoshindi wrote:
Quote:
and the add's for **** videos and dating sites(the one's with scantily clad women) are any better?


One of the main reasons I ended up renewing my premium. I can't get away with installing Fire Fox on my work PC. That and I'd rather not have to explain what site I am looking at in a memo just because someone catches a glance of my screen.



ITT: Alla's true plan comes to light
#34 Oct 09 2007 at 12:38 AM Rating: Good
Illia wrote:
Lubriderm the Hand wrote:
Pumpkin Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Wasn't me. Anywasy no one shouldbe able to report that one now.
Thats what I found odd, it went 3 weeks or so before getting phazered.


I'm a little surprised at that.

Images, when they are uploaded have a flag setting as new. Admins have a page which lists all the new images with all the reported images in there too. Stuff doesn't tend to stay in this state for very long. Most (99%) of images are approved and protected from reports. This includes the ones reported.

I'll try to investigate what happened with your image, but it wasn't reported after being up for 3 weeks.


Can you make this page available to posters(With out the approve function of course)? It would be a perfect time-waster for me.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 75 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (75)