Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

New design for www.allakhazam.com?Follow

#27 Oct 23 2007 at 8:16 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Yeah, I'm gonna agree with that too, now that I've spent a little more time with this. The blue is a little too eye-searing. Something more subdued would be better.
#28 Oct 23 2007 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
Living on a Prayer
******
30,114 posts
Is this only happening on my screen?
Screenshot

The further down a thread I get, the words in a post past the poster's information is increasingly further to the left.
#29 Oct 23 2007 at 9:38 AM Rating: Good
I'm getting that as well, Usagi, not all the time, though.
#30 Oct 23 2007 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
*
88 posts
Thank you for the kind words. We like it too. :)
#31 Oct 23 2007 at 10:03 AM Rating: Good
Looker wrote:
Thank you for the kind words. We like it too. :)
Hello there Admin I don't know. :D
#32 Oct 23 2007 at 10:14 AM Rating: Decent
Living on a Prayer
******
30,114 posts
I just noticed that when I rate a post, it justifies all the text correctly.
#33 Oct 23 2007 at 10:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Guru
***
1,274 posts
horizontal text migration should be fixed


...(stop using ie6!)
#34 Oct 23 2007 at 10:34 AM Rating: Decent
Living on a Prayer
******
30,114 posts
rale wrote:
horizontal text migration should be fixed


...(stop using ie6!)
Hehe thanks.
Yeah, it was working fine on Firefox at home.
But at work they force us to use IE6.
Which is interesting, because technically, I'm part of "they."
#35 Oct 23 2007 at 11:25 AM Rating: Decent
Princess Usagichan wrote:
rale wrote:
horizontal text migration should be fixed


...(stop using ie6!)
Hehe thanks.
Yeah, it was working fine on Firefox at home.
But at work they force us to use IE6.
Which is interesting, because technically, I'm part of "they."


Tell me, do you hate yourself in the morning?
#36 Oct 23 2007 at 11:35 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

  • The dark blue color for visited links is tough to distinguish from the light blue.

  • Also, the link doesn't register as visited if you use the "last post" arrow instead of the thread name.

  • If you won't make poster names bold, can you at least make them 1 or 2 points of font larger? They are hard to pick up at a glance when someone doesn't have an avatar.

  • The "preview post" text shows up as white text on a gray background.



  • Edited, Oct 23rd 2007 2:37pm by trickybeck
    #37 Oct 23 2007 at 12:11 PM Rating: Decent
    Is there a way to hide the allakhazam logo?
    #38 Oct 23 2007 at 12:59 PM Rating: Excellent
    Liberal Conspiracy
    *******
    TILT
    Sillygooose wrote:
    Is there a way to hide the allakhazam logo?
    You can AdBlock it in Firefox but I doubt they'd ever make an option to block their own logo. They are a company, after all.
    ____________________________
    Belkira wrote:
    Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
    #39 Oct 23 2007 at 1:21 PM Rating: Decent
    Jophiel wrote:
    Sillygooose wrote:
    Is there a way to hide the allakhazam logo?
    You can AdBlock it in Firefox but I doubt they'd ever make an option to block their own logo. They are a company, after all.
    Yeah I don't actually care about seeing the logo on my home PC, where I have adblock. But I don't believe safari has adblock, and that's all I have at work. :P

    It would be nice if the "Hide Images" button removed it, just for premium members. I wouldn't mind seeing the logo at all if it was a little more sleek or subtle, but it looks totally gay as it is.

    I don't see why the logo is important to be displayed on the displays of those who pay a subscription to be honest. I mean, we all know what it looks like, don't we? I would like to know what your thinking behind that is, Joph.

    Edit: No offense to whoever made the logo, btw :P It's perfect for the site's purpose, which is what makes it annoying at work cause I don't want people to know the site's purpose!

    Edited, Oct 23rd 2007 11:25pm by Sillygooose
    #40 Oct 23 2007 at 1:36 PM Rating: Excellent
    Liberal Conspiracy
    *******
    TILT
    Sillygooose wrote:
    I don't see why the logo is important to be displayed on the displays of those who pay a subscription to be honest. I mean, we all know what it looks like, don't we? I would like to know what your thinking behind that is, Joph.
    Because the last time Illia made a "work-safe" stylesheet, I asked about the logo and was told by Illia that the logo remaining was non-negotiable.
    ____________________________
    Belkira wrote:
    Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
    #41 Oct 23 2007 at 3:30 PM Rating: Decent
    Jophiel wrote:
    Sillygooose wrote:
    I don't see why the logo is important to be displayed on the displays of those who pay a subscription to be honest. I mean, we all know what it looks like, don't we? I would like to know what your thinking behind that is, Joph.
    Because the last time Illia made a "work-safe" stylesheet, I asked about the logo and was told by Illia that the logo remaining was non-negotiable.
    I should have known you were withholding information with a post count like that Smiley: mad
    #42 Oct 23 2007 at 3:37 PM Rating: Excellent
    ***
    2,553 posts
    Jophiel wrote:
    Sillygooose wrote:
    I don't see why the logo is important to be displayed on the displays of those who pay a subscription to be honest. I mean, we all know what it looks like, don't we? I would like to know what your thinking behind that is, Joph.
    Because the last time Illia made a "work-safe" stylesheet, I asked about the logo and was told by Illia that the logo remaining was non-negotiable.


    When your company adorns their site with big boobed eleven women, dragons and snarling orcs, we'll change our logo to look like we sell insurance. Smiley: grin

    Seriously, one touch of the space bar after loading a page, a tap on the down arrow and you're past the logo. I think this revision is pretty work safe. (of course this is my work, so hey)

    Edited, Oct 23rd 2007 5:37pm by Illia
    ____________________________
    --Illia
    Fumus, draco magus incoluit mare.
    Myrx - 70 Holy Priest, Myr - 70 Resto Shaman, Gryd - 70 Prot Warrior
    #43 Oct 23 2007 at 6:44 PM Rating: Good
    Quote:

    Yes, I'd like to know why Kingdom of Loathing isn't in your list.


    We're currently having a meatloaf helmet fight to determine who gets the rights to add such an awesome game to the list.

    Hope you're not using the Kentucky Fried Meat Sword. But seriously, ADD IT!!! Smiley: lol
    #44 Oct 23 2007 at 7:52 PM Rating: Decent
    Allakhazam Defender of Justice wrote:
    You beat me to it. Please give us feedback on this. And let us know if you notice any bugs. Also, check out http://www.allakhazam.com/gamelist.html and give us feedback on that too.

    Thanks.


    What is the policy on BBG's (especially turn based ones like KOL)? Also, how can we add a game to the list?
    #45 Oct 23 2007 at 10:56 PM Rating: Good
    Tracer Bullet
    *****
    12,636 posts
    Quote:
    Yes, I'd like to know why Kingdom of Loathing isn't in your list.

    Or Progress Quest?

    #46 Oct 24 2007 at 9:02 AM Rating: Good
    ***
    3,644 posts
    I haven't been online in a few days, came to allakhazam to go read stuff in the OoT.
    I played FFXI so i had the design, but saw the news cap for this new one.
    I have to say, I like it, a lot.
    good job ^-^
    #47 Oct 24 2007 at 1:19 PM Rating: Decent
    Illia wrote:
    Jophiel wrote:
    Sillygooose wrote:
    I don't see why the logo is important to be displayed on the displays of those who pay a subscription to be honest. I mean, we all know what it looks like, don't we? I would like to know what your thinking behind that is, Joph.
    Because the last time Illia made a "work-safe" stylesheet, I asked about the logo and was told by Illia that the logo remaining was non-negotiable.


    When your company adorns their site with big boobed eleven women, dragons and snarling orcs, we'll change our logo to look like we sell insurance. Smiley: grin

    Seriously, one touch of the space bar after loading a page, a tap on the down arrow and you're past the logo. I think this revision is pretty work safe. (of course this is my work, so hey)

    Edited, Oct 23rd 2007 5:37pm by Illia

    Then people will just wonder why the hell you scroll down immediately after opening your browser Smiley: mad
    #48 Oct 26 2007 at 11:15 PM Rating: Good
    Tracer Bullet
    *****
    12,636 posts
    trickybeck wrote:

  • The dark blue color for visited links is tough to distinguish from the light blue.

  • Also, the link doesn't register as visited if you use the "last post" arrow instead of the thread name.

  • If you won't make poster names bold, can you at least make them 1 or 2 points of font larger? They are hard to pick up at a glance when someone doesn't have an avatar.

  • The "preview post" text shows up as white text on a gray background.

  • Bump
    #49 Oct 27 2007 at 6:23 PM Rating: Decent
    Ghost in the Machine
    Avatar
    ******
    36,443 posts
    Am I the only one who's now getting it as basic HTML with a white background and Times New Roman links all over the freakin' screen?

    Screenshot.
    ____________________________
    Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
    #50 Oct 28 2007 at 6:08 AM Rating: Decent
    You have a virus Mazra. You must format c
    #51 Oct 28 2007 at 8:52 AM Rating: Good
    trickybeck wrote:
    trickybeck wrote:

  • The dark blue color for visited links is tough to distinguish from the light blue.

  • Also, the link doesn't register as visited if you use the "last post" arrow instead of the thread name.

  • If you won't make poster names bold, can you at least make them 1 or 2 points of font larger? They are hard to pick up at a glance when someone doesn't have an avatar.

  • The "preview post" text shows up as white text on a gray background.

  • Bump


    I'm with Tricky.
    1 2 Next »
    Reply To Thread

    Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

     

    Recent Visitors: 77 All times are in CST
    Anonymous Guests (77)