Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Requesting a MuteFollow

#1 Jan 25 2008 at 7:44 AM Rating: Good
****
7,451 posts
I was going back and forth with Imp. Ninja on this one for the last month or two, and while I understand that we aren't allowed to ask the Admins to ban idiocy, IN gave me some hope that some repeat offenders could be muted for a time.

From watching and participating in the SMN forums in the FFXI Job section for the last two years, I've watched the poster Craftermath from time to time build up an argument to support his belief that the Summoner should be a melee class. What will happen is that he will start a thread with a theory or proclamation, firefighting will ensue between him and the other posters, and he'll spend the next month and a half derailing every new thread that comes up in an effort to re-examine his current theory. Nothing good ever comes from it on either side of any of the arguments, and the boards end up worse off than before.

It's started up again, and I have the feeling that it's going to once again happen the way I've explained. I have a seventh sense about these things (my sixth sense is that I can tell when squirrels are afraid)...

http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/db/jobs.html?fjob=15;mid=1201272793303661355;num=2;page=1

I don't want this thread locked, but I don't want it to help Craftermath build up momentum either. I enjoy the job forums here on 'Zam, and I'm willing to state that I'm not in the minority of those that frequent that particular board that could use a vacation from Craftermath.

Normally, I would have sent this in PM to IN, but I can't really do that now, can I? If it would work better, I'd be willing to discuss this in PMs with any Admin who feels up to babysitting that forum. It would be most appreicated.

Edited, Feb 5th 2008 7:39pm by Wordaen
#2 Jan 25 2008 at 8:36 AM Rating: Excellent
I'll keep an eye on it today and discuss this with the rest of the crew as things develop.
#3 Jan 25 2008 at 8:55 AM Rating: Good
****
7,451 posts
Muchas Gracias.
#4 Jan 25 2008 at 9:07 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
I agree with whatever Acturus said.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#5 Jan 25 2008 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
Aye.

I don't even post in the SMN jobs forums because of CM. It's to much of a hassle and I post in the OOT fer cripes sake so lord knows I'm willing to put up with stupid. But it's gotten to the point you can't even read that forum these days.

I agree with OP.
#6 Jan 25 2008 at 3:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Kaelesh wrote:
Aye.

I don't even post in the SMN jobs forums because of CM. It's to much of a hassle and I post in the OOT fer cripes sake so lord knows I'm willing to put up with stupid. But it's gotten to the point you can't even read that forum these days.

I agree with OP.
I never would have had you pegged as a SMN, Kaelesh. Maybe a DRK or DRG, but not a SMN. Smiley: grin
#7 Jan 25 2008 at 4:54 PM Rating: Excellent
****
9,835 posts
Wordaen, Keeper of the Banstick wrote:
I'll keep an eye on it today and discuss this with the rest of the crew as things develop.


Don't give him anyway leeway. He was on his last legs as Acturus already said with me.

Just get rid of him.
#8 Jan 25 2008 at 6:14 PM Rating: Good
Geez, last time I tried to get CM muted/banned my thread got locked.
#9 Jan 25 2008 at 6:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Given my tolerance for some things, I don't think we'll have an issue if he/she starts up. We shall see.
#10 Jan 25 2008 at 6:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
The system Karma is intended as working.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#11 Jan 25 2008 at 8:10 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,638 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
The system Karma is intended as working.


THEREWHATYOUSEEIDID!
#12 Jan 25 2008 at 8:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
The system Karma is intended as working.
Unless craftermath is permenantly unrated, it isn't working too well...
#13 Jan 26 2008 at 12:12 AM Rating: Good
I don't see whats wrong with that thread except for people going in there to start stuff. They're the ones who need the mute. It's all well and good to make predictions when your part of the reason they always come true.
#14REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2008 at 9:43 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Here's the front page score: 2 threads started by me trying to help smn. 2 threads sold out to them dedicated to insulting me and talking about anything but SMN. I wear my default rating with pride. It makes every thread that hasn't been subdefaulted (12 out of 14 since Aug 2007) sting even more in the eyes of a guy who thinks the world agrees with him.
#15 Jan 28 2008 at 5:14 AM Rating: Excellent
****
7,451 posts
Redyoshi wrote:
I don't see whats wrong with that thread except for people going in there to start stuff. They're the ones who need the mute. It's all well and good to make predictions when your part of the reason they always come true.


I'll call that a fair statement, but I'll wager you've not been paying attention to the SMN boards over the course of the last two years like I have.

The entire board is polarized to the point where the most popular insult is to compare a poster to Craftermath. That doesn't happen without perpetuation from both sides.

I won't argue against the fact that I flame Craftermath as often as possible, but I believe it goes a little deeper than that.

Those of us who've been active participants in that board for as long as I have (if not longer) have tried the proven methods of dealing with what we've perceived as a forum troll. We tried reason, and that failed. We tried to ignore him, and we ran into the problem that Craftermath, when left to his own devices, will post nonsense in such a convincing manner that it seems like fact.

Case in point (from this very thread):
Craftermath wrote:
Here's the front page score: 2 threads started by me trying to help smn. 2 threads sold out to them dedicated to insulting me and talking about anything but SMN. I wear my default rating with pride. It makes every thread that hasn't been subdefaulted (12 out of 14 since Aug 2007) sting even more in the eyes of a guy who thinks the world agrees with him.

For a guy who thinks the smn forum needs an overhaul, Acturus hasn't started a thread of his own in the SMN forum since Jan 30, 2007. Almost the 1 year anniversary!


You can see two things in this little excerpt. First, you'll note the presence of "statistics." Now, I won't argue their validity, but I will point out that the number of poster-originated threads in a given time period has little to do with their perception of a particular forum, and nothing to do with the request I've posted in this thread. Second, you can pick out two very obvious logical fallacies in that cut. The claim that "the world agrees" with me, and the claim that I've said the forum "needs an overhaul," have no bearring on the thread at hand. And the entire tone is moderately civil with Craftermath trying to claim that he is "trying to help smn."

Now, take what I've just pointed out, and apply it to a well-written post on some aspect of playing the job class that is neither factual nor positively informative, and you have the problem that we saw when we thought that ignoring Craftermath was a useful tactic. He just kept posting speculation without fact, claimed it as fact, and potentially set a lot of people off in the wrong direction. Rhetorically speaking, when the traditional methods of play still work, how does claiming them to be useless in addition to asking posters to kill themselves (Imperial Ninja saw this firsthand) because they're still following/teaching these effective methods ever help anyone?

So what's left? Reasoning with him failed, ignoring him failed, and since a good number of posters either used to exist or still exist on that board want to still help communicate good information to new players, the only choice left is to openly discredit him. Unfortunately, that started with fact and proof long ago with posters like NegativePositiv and Hakamaru, and has just become a repetitive chore ending with the one-line insult replies that you see today. Sadly, too many useful posters like Hakamaru have been driven off that board out of sheer annoyance for one person.

For two years it's been a game, for Craftermath, and for everyone else who regularly frequented that board. I was so bothered by it at one point that I offered to take a ban myself if it meant getting him off the boards permanently.

But, I digress. I'm not here looking for a banstick. I'm just here to predict what I believe is the inevitable future based on what I've experienced in the last two years. It's never been the issue with whatever half-brained or crackpot theory that Craftermath or any other poster has tried to come up with that bothered me, it was always that Craftermath would sit atop a very high ivory tower and claim that because a certain non-traditional method du jour worked in a bare minimum of situations under ideal conditions that the accepted and traditional methods were suddenly useless and should be put to the ground. It's always been a bald insult to every player who's ever made a worthwhile contribution to the Summoner community, and that's been the reason why Craftermath remains the whipping boy of that forum.

Naturally, I'm slightly perturbed that I have to write a novella here to further illustrate my point, but this would have never been such an issue had Craftermath shown a little tolerance for the rest of the Summoner community, because Lord knows we at least tried to show him some, onceuponatime.

I can only close reiterating what IN has already stated in response to this thread, and you can take it for what it's worth:

Imperial Ninja wrote:
Don't give him anyway leeway. He was on his last legs as Acturus already said with me.

Just get rid of him.


Edited, Jan 28th 2008 8:28am by Acturus
#16 Jan 28 2008 at 5:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Given my tolerance for some things, I don't think we'll have an issue if he/she starts up. We shall see.

Would it help if I got him all riled up? What? I'm helping!
#17 Feb 05 2008 at 10:35 AM Rating: Good
Comments like this and this are the reasons people want him muted, you know; vitriolic and rude responses to otherwise logical reasons why his proposal is wrong flawed.

Edited for accuracy.

Edited, Feb 5th 2008 1:40pm by Norellicus
#18 Feb 05 2008 at 2:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
I would like a mute as well, mainly one to do housework and odd jobs without complaining. And I'll ignore their angry signing. Smiley: madSmiley: mad
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#19 Feb 05 2008 at 7:39 PM Rating: Excellent
As of today, there needs to be a ceasefire between a few of you and Craftermath. All of you are baiting and flaming each other and it's gone just about far enough. Knock it off, agree to disagree and let this go. Everyone needs to just back up and chill a little. This thread is locked.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 67 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (67)