Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
This thread is locked

Karma SystemFollow

#1 Jun 20 2008 at 7:44 PM Rating: Good
Hello, everyone. I've been playing FFXI on and off for over four years and while I always lurk Alla, I didn't post here much until recently. I like getting into discussions, even if it means tolerating flame wars, but the karma system here just seems very flawed to me.

Of course, it generally can easily be ignored, but when topics go to sub-default, that is when you need to really look at the merits of this system. This is because many people do not have the "no filter" option on and could be missing out on informative topics.

The reason I'm unhappy with the system is because the posters themselves have too much power. Everyone has their rivals and people they clash with, and nothing is stopping them from rating down everything they see posted by that person. If you go into a certain job's forum and bring up a discussion that not everyone is okay with discussing, it gets nuked pretty quickly and commonly goes to sub-default. Sometimes, informative topics get banished because the some guys had a personal issue with the OP.

Don't get me wrong, I see the merit in it. Giving the members the opportunity to police themselves saves a lot of hard work for mods, and in theory would keep boards free of trashy troll topics. But the fact of the matter is, it never works out that way in practice.

One thing that sites like GameFaqs do, and I think it's one of the best systems out there, is if a post is offensive or against the ToS or whatever, you can report it. You have to specifically state what is wrong with the post (can't just say you don't like the poster) and a mod will delete the message if it is indeed an infraction. This might not work on this site, but I think something is wrong with the way things are now.

I'm not saying this because I personally get my posts sub-defaulted, but I see unjust instances all of the time. And I also see the high-post count regulars getting rated up to oblivion for things that "unpopular" posted would get nuked the Hell for posting. It doesn't seem right to encourage this conformist, "say what people want to hear" attitude on this site.

Well, there's my little feedback. Flame/Rate down away! :p

Edited, Jun 24th 2008 10:16am by Darqflame
#2 Jun 20 2008 at 8:31 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,618 posts
The problem is not with the posters, it is with the poster that actally care bout thier Karmaz. This is a "user moderated" board and I use that term with great flexability as the Adins take great care in policing the boards. If a poster has a habit of making **** post then untill they can prove that the post they are making now actually have some merit to them then they will get rated down no matter what.


The system is not perfect but it works as intended, I have very very rarely seen a Sub-D post the did not deserve it. Those are usually posted in the wrong forum, utterly stupid, or just plain ******* ignorant. Then again all of my statements are made incorrect when you have posters that deserve sub-d status and are for some god awful reason rated up at supersnic speeds.
#3 Jun 20 2008 at 8:45 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
The problem is not with the posters, it is with the poster that actally care bout thier Karmaz.


I could see that argument, but it begs the question: why even have it if it's nothing to care about?
#4 Jun 20 2008 at 10:08 PM Rating: Good
SummonerVivel wrote:
Quote:
The problem is not with the posters, it is with the poster that actally care bout thier Karmaz.


I could see that argument, but it begs the question: why even have it if it's nothing to care about?
Well, it's not something to go all e-peen drama queen over.

It's something to care about, insofar as determining what posts you want to be visible, though.
#5 Jun 20 2008 at 10:13 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,618 posts
SummonerVivel wrote:
Quote:
The problem is not with the posters, it is with the poster that actally care bout thier Karmaz.


I could see that argument, but it begs the question: why even have it if it's nothing to care about?


Karma is like smokes, they are not needed but without them I will prolly hit you.
#6 Jun 20 2008 at 10:41 PM Rating: Good
***
2,405 posts
SummonerVivel wrote:
Stuff


In other words, you've just spent a few minutes in the SMN forum before finding out why hardly anyone posts there any more.
#7 Jun 20 2008 at 11:01 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
In other words, you've just spent a few minutes in the SMN forum before finding out why hardly anyone posts there any more.


Really, it's not even that. It actually started when I turned off my default filter on the BLU forums and saw a very informative topic on the front page.

But yeah, the SMN forum is bad -.-
#8 Jun 21 2008 at 2:44 AM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
The flaws of the karma system have repeatedly been brought up to the staff with the response every time being that they do not see any issue. I realize the site has larger projects to focus on, but most of the solutions to the current flawed system involve eliminating aspects of the system rather than adding to it, which is comparatively a much smaller amount of effort. Most also include minimizing karma whines and database usage.
#9 Jun 21 2008 at 2:51 AM Rating: Decent
jackjeckel the Pest wrote:
If a poster has a habit of making sh*t post then untill they can prove that the post they are making now actually have some merit to them then they will get rated down no matter what.

The system is not perfect but it works as intended, I have very very rarely seen a Sub-D post the did not deserve it. Those are usually posted in the wrong forum, utterly stupid, or just plain @#%^ing ignorant. Then again all of my statements are made incorrect when you have posters that deserve sub-d status and are for some god awful reason rated up at supersnic speeds.


Yeah. Basically, what happens is you have people who aren't posting ****.. in fact they may be posting good stuff, it's just that person A and his friends don't like what's being said and so downrate every post just because.

This system is also inherantly flawed in that some people (ie, people who aren't Sages yet) can't downrate, and therefore can't defend themselves if they're being downrated maliciously. At a certain point, with a certain post count, everyone should become a Sage and thus have the ability to rate.
#11 Jun 21 2008 at 9:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
TheRogueX wrote:
jackjeckel the Pest wrote:
If a poster has a habit of making sh*t post then untill they can prove that the post they are making now actually have some merit to them then they will get rated down no matter what.

The system is not perfect but it works as intended, I have very very rarely seen a Sub-D post the did not deserve it. Those are usually posted in the wrong forum, utterly stupid, or just plain @#%^ing ignorant. Then again all of my statements are made incorrect when you have posters that deserve sub-d status and are for some god awful reason rated up at supersnic speeds.


Yeah. Basically, what happens is you have people who aren't posting sh*t.. in fact they may be posting good stuff, it's just that person A and his friends don't like what's being said and so downrate every post just because.

This system is also inherantly flawed in that some people (ie, people who aren't Sages yet) can't downrate, and therefore can't defend themselves if they're being downrated maliciously. At a certain point, with a certain post count, everyone should become a Sage and thus have the ability to rate.


I think you mean Scholar.
____________________________

#12 Jun 21 2008 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
is Happy on Friday!
Avatar
*****
12,448 posts
the way I see it is this.

there are many more forums than admins, and if every post that offended someone had to be reported, the admins would end up working 24/7 aand still not keep up with the report rate.

hence, we have the karma system, which leaves the issues in the hands of the posters and their ethics. people are asses, it's a fact of life. If you don't like what they're doing, call them on it, to their face, instead of going and ******** to the admins and giving them more work.
____________________________
Theytak, Siren Server, FFXI [Retired]
Amerida Baker, Balmung Server, FFXIV
LOLGAXE IS MY ETERNAL RIVAL!

Reiterpallasch wrote:
Glitterhands wrote:
Am I the only one who clicked on this thread expecting actual baby photos [of Jinte]? o.O

Except if it were baby photos, it would be like looking at before and afters of Michael Jackson. Only instead of turning into a white guy, he changes into a chick!
#13 Jun 21 2008 at 1:40 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
SummonerVivel wrote:
Quote:
In other words, you've just spent a few minutes in the SMN forum before finding out why hardly anyone posts there any more.


Really, it's not even that. It actually started when I turned off my default filter on the BLU forums and saw a very informative topic on the front page.

But yeah, the SMN forum is bad -.-


I only see a couple sub-default posts in the BLU forums... neither of which are anything helpful.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#14 Jun 21 2008 at 3:09 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I only see a couple sub-default posts in the BLU forums... neither of which are anything helpful.


Thanks for the detective work, but the topic was rated back up when I posted in it, asking why it was sub-default.


Quote:
the way I see it is this.

there are many more forums than admins, and if every post that offended someone had to be reported, the admins would end up working 24/7 aand still not keep up with the report rate.

hence, we have the karma system, which leaves the issues in the hands of the posters and their ethics. people are asses, it's a fact of life. If you don't like what they're doing, call them on it, to their face, instead of going and ******** to the admins and giving them more work.


It becomes a brown-nosing quest that really shouldn't exist in the first place. Obviously people with the ability to rate up/rate down won't see a problem with this because they hold the power, but it's really hard to justify otherwise.

When my LS mate was giving me tips on which forum to go to for the most rate ups, I felt that it was pretty ridiculous.
#15 Jun 21 2008 at 5:12 PM Rating: Good
is Happy on Friday!
Avatar
*****
12,448 posts
SummonerVivel wrote:
Quote:
I only see a couple sub-default posts in the BLU forums... neither of which are anything helpful.


Thanks for the detective work, but the topic was rated back up when I posted in it, asking why it was sub-default.


Quote:
the way I see it is this.

there are many more forums than admins, and if every post that offended someone had to be reported, the admins would end up working 24/7 aand still not keep up with the report rate.

hence, we have the karma system, which leaves the issues in the hands of the posters and their ethics. people are asses, it's a fact of life. If you don't like what they're doing, call them on it, to their face, instead of going and ******** to the admins and giving them more work.


It becomes a brown-nosing quest that really shouldn't exist in the first place. Obviously people with the ability to rate up/rate down won't see a problem with this because they hold the power, but it's really hard to justify otherwise.

When my LS mate was giving me tips on which forum to go to for the most rate ups, I felt that it was pretty ridiculous.


a brown noser is a brown noser, whether it be on an internet forum, or at the workplace.
____________________________
Theytak, Siren Server, FFXI [Retired]
Amerida Baker, Balmung Server, FFXIV
LOLGAXE IS MY ETERNAL RIVAL!

Reiterpallasch wrote:
Glitterhands wrote:
Am I the only one who clicked on this thread expecting actual baby photos [of Jinte]? o.O

Except if it were baby photos, it would be like looking at before and afters of Michael Jackson. Only instead of turning into a white guy, he changes into a chick!
#16 Jun 21 2008 at 6:10 PM Rating: Decent
*******
50,767 posts
SummonerVivel wrote:
Obviously people with the ability to rate up/rate down won't see a problem with this because they hold the power,
Screenshot


Edit: And thus we prove that the color of the name has little to do with the arrow pressed.

Edited, Jun 21st 2008 11:06pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#17 Jun 21 2008 at 6:17 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
It's true.

We are all just trying to keep the grey man down. We should be ashamed of ourselves, maybe Allakhazam should implement an affirmative action plan.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#18 Jun 21 2008 at 9:37 PM Rating: Decent
lolGaxe, you both prove and disprove my point. O.o
#19 Jun 22 2008 at 8:12 AM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Professor Jinte wrote:
there are many more forums than admins, and if every post that offended someone had to be reported, the admins would end up working 24/7 aand still not keep up with the report rate.

The problem isn't with self moderation. Self moderation works fine in a forum like this. The problem is that the karma system is a terrible implementation of self moderation.
#20 Jun 22 2008 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,811 posts
I WANNA SAY IT! I WANNA SAY IT! PUUUUH-LEEEZ CAN I SAY IT???


*AHEM*

Quote:
The Karma System is Working as Intended.




~Jedi powers! nnnGOOOOOO!~

These are not the Admins you are looking for...
#21 Jun 22 2008 at 7:25 PM Rating: Default
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
I think you mean Scholar.


Yes Mistress. I am sorry Mistress. May I have my lashings please Mistress?

*grovels*
#22 Jun 22 2008 at 8:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
TheRogueX wrote:
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
I think you mean Scholar.


Yes Mistress. I am sorry Mistress. May I have my lashings please Mistress?

*grovels*


THAT I can do! /ppppshaw

bow before me, minion!
____________________________

#23 Jun 22 2008 at 9:11 PM Rating: Decent
Usually people karma bomb someone because they 1. Asked a question that was answered in the forum stickies because it's asked once a week 2. Posted a drama thread without any evidence, usually under a sock puppet, and 3. Went off on someone in an unjustified manner during the course of a drama thread. (I.e. invoked Godwin's Law.)

Of the three cases, the only one that doesn't really deserve a karma bomb is the first one. But unfortunately, it's the only tool we have to express our displeasure with someone besides throwing words at them. Smart people won't be offended by the rate downs, and will instead realize that if they post crap people don't like, they get red arrow'd into oblivion. In that manner, Alla promotes sort of an internet "survival of the fittest" -- a yellow, red, or green name indicates that you generally don't post things that annoy people.

Once in a while you'll get a karma stalker. If it's a real karma stalker, then the mods will fix the issue. That's rare though.

Most of the time, though, the karma system works as intended. If you're getting rated down, figure out why and fix it. Bad grammar? Edit your posts. Asking FAQs? Check the database. Flaming people for no reason? Cool your temper.

(The latter is the reason I'm stuck at sage; I tend to rage at people too often.)
#24 Jun 22 2008 at 11:09 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
While all the forums have the abuse you speak of to a minor extent, the FFXI forums seem to be the only ones where it's a real issue. Since it's only one section of the forums where it's a major problem, that would point to the posters, not the system.

If an admin felt like it, they could find the groups of posters in those forums who are unjustly rating people based on personal agendas and not based on post quality and norate them. It's shouldn't be too hard to track them down but I get the feeling it's a good portion of the FFXI community who abuses the system based on the number of karma threads started by users from that section of the forums.

Unfortunately, you can't fix stupid, I've tried. If your worried about missing something important, just leave your filter settings set to never filter and ignore the idiots.

As far as Karma in general, ignore it. If your Scholar or higher, rate the idiots down and the informative people up, just don't abuse it. If you can't rate people, don't worry. If it's ignorant enough to deserve a red arrow, I am sure someone else will rate it for you.

And I am happy to say that although the post count vs. rating problem is still around, I watched a high post count Scholar deservingly drop to default a few weeks back. Unfortunately, Scholar was returned to him later that day.
#25 Jun 23 2008 at 7:03 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,793 posts
Really the problem isn't the karma system. The problem is the spirit of what it was designed to do got lost along the way. Any system no matter how designed can be corrupted. Over time, its become more and more about voting on posts/posters instead of removing what deserves to be removed. Forums exist for forum users to express them selves, and if you tell the users it doesn't matter that they got a rate down for doing so what was the point of it? "it doesn't matter" if it doesn't matter, why have it?

An admin, in the middle of one of the user bases flame fests wrote:
The karma thing is unfortunately unavoidable in a thread about a sensitive topic like this. When people feel strongly one way, they will rate down the opposite opinion simply because they do not agree with the argument. This is allowable and a reasonable reason for rating down.

Emphasis mine.
I disagree with that.

On topic? Non offensive? Legible even if not perfect? Insightful or informative to the topic at hand? Yes yes and yes? Then why was it rated down? Oh, because someone disagreed with either this post or just remembers your name from another post they didn't like.. Wait can't that person just say they disagree and why? Nope. Because its not a forum anymore its its american idol and the colored names are casting their votes.

One need not even change the karma system to clean things up. All that needs to happen is to make it fresh and clear in the minds of user base what its supposed to be like. No more american idol rating, make the rating system used for what its meant to do. This might take a week or two of "babysitting" a the users of a certain games forums which shall remain nameless, which DOES appear to be where the problem is limited to *cough*..

In before admin "system working as intended" despite spam about free ranged eggs in the FFXI forums being rated "Excellent" (who remembers that?).
____________________________

#26 Jun 23 2008 at 9:41 AM Rating: Decent
Living on a Prayer
******
30,114 posts
TheRogueX wrote:
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
I think you mean Scholar.


Yes Mistress. I am sorry Mistress. May I have my lashings please Mistress?

*grovels*
Smiley: lol
What?
« Previous 1 2
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 97 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (97)