Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

trickster's tricky trickFollow

#1 Oct 16 2005 at 3:48 PM Rating: Default
this game is ******* bs. i ma sick and tired for the asses in this game.
this is wat happened for everybody who is confused.
oct, 14th 2005 9:40AM PDT i put up hauberk for 400k in my bazaar by mistake.
9:45am trickster bought it for 400k w/ tax.
9:47 i found out and bagg him to give it back for 600k
9:50 i start /shouting and other ppl in jeuno backed me up
10:25 trickster agree 600k for my hauberk back.
10:30 i borrowed 200k from a stranger called fearingcyclone so i have 625k.
10:35 i traded 600k to trickster. he took the money but didn't give back hauberk and asked for buy my damp eye for 100k.
10:36 i have to go afk.
11:15 back to game and went to Garlaige Citadel and bag him for hauberk back.
12:45 made agreement that i clear his name and no post in ALA, KI or shouts at Jeuno to damage his name. and i will quit 4 days and wait for my hauberk back.
oct, 16th 2005 went online to check. Hauberk [trickster -> ???? oct, 14th 2005 4:15PM]

dat's enough of trickster's trick. he took advatage of my mistake. did a trade scam on me. and break the promise.
he wanted his name clear b4 he gives back my hauberk. then he sells it instead. lmfao.
i will let eveybody on this server know what kinda person he is now. and have fun TRICKY TRICKSTER.
#2 Oct 16 2005 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
*
190 posts
Dibidu wrote:
10:35 i traded 600k to trickster. he took the money but didn't give back hauberk and asked for buy my damp eye for 100k.


So you traded him 600k when you didn't see a Hauberk in the trade window?
#3 Oct 16 2005 at 7:11 PM Rating: Good
**
470 posts
/comfort dibidu..

but just wondering... the trade won't happen unless both sides clicked ok, no? so why did you click ok when hauberk wasn't up on his side? D:
#4 Oct 17 2005 at 12:17 PM Rating: Good
***
1,879 posts
I don't like trickster as it is. I went to help in ClanDestine on their Phomiuna Mission because I was going to pick the lock when they had no luck with getting a key. I died on the way there, and Trickster went back to the Safehold, switched to THF and brought tools and picked it... making my being there pointless. Plus, he didn't even bring THF gear, so he was running around as a naked mithra with a warp cudgel doing nothing for the party.
#5 Oct 17 2005 at 5:30 PM Rating: Good
***
1,309 posts
Quote:
14th 2005 9:40AM PDT i put up hauberk for 400k in my bazaar by mistake.


You should have double checked before you put the price up, you made the mistake and it's not his fault. Mind you, I do not know Trickster, I have never spoken with and/or pted with him. But the fact still remains that you made the mistake and honestly he would have been well within his rights to keep it. I know that if I saw someone put an expensive item in their bazaar and it was obvious they put the wrong price I would buy it and keep it for myself (unless I knew the person of course). Next time be more careful because if you make that mistake again, the person that bought it may not be so kind as to return the item for you.
#6 Oct 17 2005 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
*
108 posts
Erm... Mateo...

Trickster didn't give the Hauberk back. :3
#7 Oct 17 2005 at 5:53 PM Rating: Good
***
1,309 posts
Quote:
Erm... Mateo...

Trickster didn't give the Hauberk back. :3


Oh... I didn't know, good, he shouldn't have to, but if he did make a promise to I understand, if you give your word you should always keep it. My point is though is that he shouldn't have promised to give it back in the first place.
#8 Oct 17 2005 at 7:25 PM Rating: Decent
First, Trickster didn't even have to agree to the 600k buy back... he bought the haub for 400k. Period.

Second, why in the hell would you set 600k in your trade window and then click ok all before seeing the Haub. Yes, you put 600k in the trade window so he knows you're serious... but do NOT click ok until you see the item you're purchasing is in the trade window. Also, it's wise to check the item on the other end as many people have traded lizard boots passing them off as leaping boots and same with insect wings for the emp's hairpin.

Sorry man, you made one mistake, and that sux and is harsh... but you fell right into making a second mistake. At this point, I don't think you have a right to discredit a player's name based on the fact you do not pay attention to what you are doing. If you are new to the game, then I must ask... how did you obtain the haub in the first place and/or why you had it. If you're not new to the game, you could have probably been a little more cautious at what you were doing.

Fact of the matter is, gil was transferred for the merchandise originally. You can contest the 600k transfer that occured second, however, again, you clicked ok before the haub was even in the trade box/window... that is the same as saying: "Here you go! Just take this."

Take this as a lesson to pay a little more attention to your actions, and at least next time hopefully you won't make your second ever post on this board to ruin the name of another player... regardless of his/her popularity on the server.
#9 Oct 18 2005 at 3:17 AM Rating: Default
*
155 posts
Actually. Talk to a GM about this. If you actually read the terms of agreements ( the new one) You can get banned for breaking a promise like that. You can no longer tell someone something and then not go through with it. The 400k was your mistake. But he did agree to sell it back for the 600k. Which you paid. So you have a case. Therefore broken promise. I would seriously go to a GM about this cuz i think you might get it back.
#10 Oct 18 2005 at 3:34 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Actually. Talk to a GM about this. If you actually read the terms of agreements ( the new one) You can get banned for breaking a promise like that. You can no longer tell someone something and then not go through with it. The 400k was your mistake. But he did agree to sell it back for the 600k. Which you paid. So you have a case. Therefore broken promise. I would seriously go to a GM about this cuz i think you might get it back.


If this is the case (I haven't read the new T&C) it is an empty gesture by SE. It would be totally unenforcable! For SE to do anything you need proof of a break of terms and conditions, how can you prove a promise has been made?

Screenshots are not proof as they can so easily be altered the only thing you could possibly hope for is that it was soon enough that any correspondance is still in your log file.
#11 Oct 18 2005 at 3:58 AM Rating: Good
**
470 posts
i think if you can tell the date and time of it happening, the GMs can track their database for the chat log. which would show the agreement between you too. as for whether they track if you two made a trade transaction, i dunno~ worht a try tho
#12 Oct 18 2005 at 4:08 AM Rating: Good
I just checked the user agreement on the playonline website and it states:

Quote:
Article 4: User Disputes
You shall be solely responsible for resolving any and all disputes that may arise between you and other Game players or PlayOnline users in connection with the Game or your use of PlayOnline, and for paying any and all expenses incurred by you in connection with resolving such dispute. SEI shall not be responsible for mediating or resolving any such disputes and shall have no liability to you or to any third party for any costs, fees, expenses, damages or other losses incurred in connection with or as a result of any such disputes.
#13 Oct 18 2005 at 10:02 AM Rating: Decent
right... I'm with Jetta there... it's here-say and your word against anothers when it comes down to it. Even if they check chat logs, those logs still do not display any transfer of items or gil. The most those logs would reflect is the initial purchase out of the bazaar and a trade request and trade complete.. tho it would not be mentioned what was traded. At this point, it can easily be contested that the item was returned. It can even be contested that he gave back the item and the OP didn't give back the gil. Whether it be fact or fiction is irrelevant considering it would still lead to a dispute. This is kinda like tryin to rat out a class mate for stealing your lucky pen or something...

oh, and might I remind you... this is a game, so the item is nothing more than a bunch of 0's and 1's and is not a real entity. Now had Trickster grabbed your POL ID and cracked it to log in and do whatever... Then SE would be able to investigate the theft of the account only... I do not believe they would investigate the theft of any items related to said account theft. Reason being is gil is "pretend" and $$$ is real. It's kinda like playing Monopoly and ******** cause someone didn't pay you rent for your two hotel's on Boardwalk.
#14 Oct 18 2005 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
*
221 posts
Ouch.

Hauberk goes for 3.8mil~ Or around that.. Trickster just saved 4mil on his berk.

Sorry you got jipped; I know it's tough love but you did make a few mistakes, which you've openly admitted, the first being accidently pricing your bazaar. It happens, just like people overpaying for something in the AH; Sometimes you get it back, sometimes you don't. Then you traded him 600k and he didn't throw the Berk in the window, I can't see why you did this, but man oh man does it make me wince to imagine.

I know it doesnt justify his actions, but things like this happen everyday, some people just can't be trusted to do the "right thing." We've seen it time and time again, why, just the other day Charleyquin stole Lydya's Peacock Charm; Sold it on AH and then bought a SH+1 with the gil, but who didn't see that coming?
#15 Oct 18 2005 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Dibi, you are in my LS, and I try to avoid openly discuss what I think about this.

First off, I have items "cheated" from me away in the past. Like trading/lending someone some valuable item, and never get it back. I think everyone have similar experiences before.

AH and Bazaar blunders are bound to happen. And people who took advantage of it does not have the responsibility to return it. I have returned gil to people who over-bid items of mine, and I have asked people returning gil or item to me for me overbidding. Some returned the gil or item, but they do that because they are nice. They do not have to do that. If they want to be a bast**d and not return it, there is really nothing one can do about that.

People who prefer to be a bast**d in an online game (even by playing the rules of the game on his side) is hurting their own fun in the game. Do not blame others for not helping or playing with you in the future. You made a choice that others do not like, and others do not have to like you.

I agree Trickster does something that betrayed trust among players, but at the same time it may have been unwise on your part to accept a deal/trade, even you kind of know that person is more likely to betray trust considering in what they had already done. IMO Trying to resolve this conflict by making posts in Alla or KI does not help at all. It just makes the issue too big, which make both parties unable to back down and strike a deal.

IMO Trust betrayal in the game is foolish. In the end, the virtual item really worths nothing (as Nebz said). You play the game for fun, social, and challenge. ******** around really leads to nothing in the most important objective in a game.

Sorry if this may not be the best thing you want to hear, Dibi. I try to be your friend, and at the same time be reasonable.

And for you, Trickster... I wish you luck in the future of the game. Trust and connections worth a lot more than a piece of armour. What you have done will definetly hurt you in having fun in the game. At least, you can count me out for me to help you. I do not help anyone that I know betray trust to others and not willing to apologize or amend their actions.

And for Dibi, if you want to make the money back, I will help you. I am always into legit gil making. But it is best to put this thing into a closure for now.

Edited, Tue Oct 18 11:39:45 2005 by scchan

Edited, Tue Oct 18 11:35:43 2005 by scchan
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#16 Oct 18 2005 at 10:35 AM Rating: Decent
**
893 posts
Quote:
But it is best to put this thing into a closure for now.


As always, the voice of reason. =) Rate ^^ Amanada Smiley: smile
#17REDACTED, Posted: Oct 18 2005 at 5:22 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) WHoot! Tricster ftw! Now let see if i can find that dummy sitting in lower jeuno with a P. Charm for 100K ^.^ I really wish there was more ppl who ***** up on bazaar items or overbid on stuff. I truly think its funny. Besides, have u ever thought of buying gil? i'm not reccomending it, i just think that can replace whatever you lost.
#18 Oct 18 2005 at 9:24 PM Rating: Good
**
291 posts
Me personally, I would have bought the Haub for the safety of the individual selling it. It is an obvious mistake even though sometimes people quit the game and sell everything at cheap prices to give a bundle of money away to a friend or a LS or w/e and also to help other people out who want to buy the items but cant afford them.

After buying the mispriced item I would talk to the seller and make sure it was or wasnt a mistake and in the event it being a mistake I would sell it back to them for what I paid thus preventing a problem to occure such as this one.

People are greedy and dishonest in reality and in fantasy. We need to be aware and alert at all times and pay close attention to detail. You never know when someone will come along and try to take advantage of you. Let this be a lesson learned because you wont be getting back your money nor your Haub because this guy/girl obviously does not care about your well being and success in this game. Greed is terrible and it makes people to terrible things.

I am so sorry you have to go through this. T_T
#19 Oct 18 2005 at 10:09 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
After buying the mispriced item I would talk to the seller and make sure it was or wasnt a mistake and in the event it being a mistake I would sell it back to them for what I paid thus preventing a problem to occure such as this one.


Wow, that's incredibly nice..

If someone makes an AH mistake and I end up with 300k for a 30k item, I'll be more than glad to refund the difference... or even the full amount if I get the item back. HOWEVER, a bazaar is a tad bit different. IMO, a Bazaar is like a garage sale/swap meet. You set your own prices on the stuff (usually at a slight discount from the bigger sellers, in this case the AH) and sell it yourself. I search bazaar's left and right and up and down and rinse and repeat again... it never ends. I see a good deal, I grab the item and see if I can't make anything off of it. I've lost gil by buying items I thought were more valuable than what I paid for them and found out the case to be opposite or the price is fairly similar between the Bazaar and AH.

If I were to go to a garage sale IRL, the person hosting the sale has already put out what he/she wants to sell and either has it marked or knows how much he/she wants for the item. Personally, if I pick up a $50 camera and the guy says it's $5 and I know I can get $20 for it on ebay, I'm not gunna sit there and ask the guy if he's sure he wants to sell it that cheap.

Bazaar's aren't much different. The player set the price him/herself and should be well aware of how much he/she placed the item for sale for. In a supermarket or department store, if something is mislabelled with the wrong price (not the customer switching labels, but mismarked by the company), the store will probably take a bite of their profits and sell you for the marked price as it was their error. However, if they can prove you changed the price label, then they probably would take different action instead.

Bazaar mistakes are not like AH mistakes. AH mistakes you cannot correct after you click yes to the "are you sure?" question. A bazaar you can correct any mistake you find by just resetting the selling price. Further more, for that matter, once someone buys something from your bazaar, it does not say how much they paid for it... it only says that they purchased it. Which suggests the OP was aware of the price of the item before hand if he knows how much it sold for, and therefore could have easily corrected his mislabelled price for the item. Had I been the buyer in that situation, I would have probably purchased the gear and acted very funny to the OP upon request to purchase it back for 150% of what I paid for it.
#20 Oct 19 2005 at 12:37 AM Rating: Decent
*
155 posts
Ok. Look, i said the new terms of agreement /sigh..... if you look on the Playonline website, what you directly quoted is correct. However, it is the OLD terms of agreement (Last modified July 1 2004) The new ones you can access on POL were updated July 22, 2005. I cant do all that fancy direct quote stuff. but i'll write down the part that i think this falls under. Sexual harrassment, Stalking, Fraud, or other activites that break the law or make other users uncomfortable. I think that what happened is fraud. Or maybe they are thinking something a little more serious. I would still talk to a GM about it. It at least makes you uncomfortable ^^; anyways test tommorrow! Good luck me!
#21 Oct 19 2005 at 2:48 AM Rating: Good
**
792 posts
As rarely as this may happen, I agree with ElvaanKrem completely and fully. Does it suck that you lost such an item in such a manner? Yeah. Is the guy a **** for taking advantage of an obviously-wrongly-priced piece of equipment? Hell yeah. But are you entitled to it back? Sucks to say it, but not in the slightest. It was a mistake on your part and your part alone. Rude as it may be, Trickster isn't obligated to give anything back, or even talk to you. Now, it's not to say that Trickster's reputation hasn't been damaged in the exchange (although seeing as how the OP has one single post, I'm kind of wary to take it as undeniable truth), but the truth is:

You're SOL.

Sorry. ><;
#22 Oct 19 2005 at 3:06 AM Rating: Decent
Gotta go with the concensus on this one: You made the mistake of mispricing your item. You then continued to "strike a deal" with someone named "Trickster".

If it makes you feel better, chalk it up to paying an idiot tax. Apparently the only way he's gonig to make money is by taking advantage of people. Since he made an extra 3 mil off your mistake, maybe he'll leave everyone else alone for a while.

Thanks for taking one for team. :)
#23 Oct 19 2005 at 10:12 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
Sexual harrassment, Stalking, Fraud, or other activites that break the law or make other users uncomfortable. I think that what happened is fraud. Or maybe they are thinking something a little more serious.


To define this a little more, I'm certain that asking to see that Mithra's tail is not sexual harrassment but instead asking what the person is wearing IRL and discussing undesired sexual scenarios one would like to do with another. Stalking... well, I don't think they mean if your Elvaan is following my Taru around Giddeus all day... Fraud... as in CC Fraud... Identity theft... illegal payment for the FFXI account/POL ID by means of falsified, or stolen, credit card information... not an ingame scam. Finally, I don't know of many activities in FFXI that break the law. MPK, tho a form of killing, still does not break the law as murder is one person killing another person. Elvaans, Taru's, Galka's, Mithra's, Hume's, they're all make believe and do not posses a physical entity. I'm not saying SE won't take action on MPK'rs as they ruin the game for others... but a one on one player dispute will not be handled by SE as it is meerely nothing more than one word against the other's. Good try with the new TOS... but you're confusing the line between reality and fiction.
#24 Oct 19 2005 at 11:24 AM Rating: Decent
I think I could make an arguement that MPK is the same as Manslaughter, though. :)

Seriously though, no "crime" has been commited. If I walk into Wal-Mart, see a price tag on a new TV for $5, pay them $5 and leave with a TV and then in the parking lot they tell me "Oops, we made a mistake", it's on them. It's a legal purchase. The matter has then fallen into the jurisdiction of the civil court.

That being said, we are talking about- as Nebz so acurately put it- dealing with 0's and 1's. The "victim", Dibi, is not out any real money, so there is no crime here. At all. I wouldn't even suspect you'd have a good civil case.
#25 Oct 19 2005 at 11:37 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
Seriously though, no "crime" has been commited. If I walk into Wal-Mart, see a price tag on a new TV for $5, pay them $5 and leave with a TV and then in the parking lot they tell me "Oops, we made a mistake", it's on them. It's a legal purchase. The matter has then fallen into the jurisdiction of the civil court.


I think I could guess the outcome of such a civil trial.

The underline is the reversal of such deals should not be taken to be granted. Bazaar in AH, mispricing in Wal-Mart are like a contract. You sold an item at a certain price that you set (by mistake or not), contract is signed, and the price should be final. If there is a mistake of the price, it should be considered as a favor and not a right for reversal of the deal. If Wal-Mart can reverse their price anyway they want, all consumer rights just go into the toilet.

If I see a cashier give me to much change, or AH bluder that leads to much gil sent to me, I will return it. But it is not a right to demand such a return.

If deals (even the one that are stroke by mistake) can be changed unilaterily, then there will be chaos and no fairness.

Being fair does not always equate individual interests are defended. But the community as a whole will benefit for fairness. Yes I am a believer We > Me type person; in the end, by defending community interest, everyone will end as a winner.
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#26 Oct 19 2005 at 11:38 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
Seriously though, no "crime" has been commited. If I walk into Wal-Mart, see a price tag on a new TV for $5, pay them $5 and leave with a TV and then in the parking lot they tell me "Oops, we made a mistake", it's on them. It's a legal purchase. The matter has then fallen into the jurisdiction of the civil court.


I think I could guess the outcome of such a civil trial.

The underline is the reversal of such deals should not be taken to be granted. Bazaar in AH, mispricing in Wal-Mart are like a contract. You sold an item at a certain price that you set (by mistake or not), contract is signed, and the price should be final. If there is a mistake of the price, it should be considered as a favor and not a right for reversal of the deal. If Wal-Mart can reverse their price anyway they want, all consumer rights just go into the toilet.

If I see a cashier give me to much change, or AH bluder that leads to much gil sent to me, I will return it. But it is not a right to demand such a return.

If deals (even the one that are stroke by mistake) can be changed unilaterily, then there will be chaos and no fairness.

Being fair does not always equate individual interests are defended. But the community as a whole will benefit for fairness. Yes I am a believer We > Me type person; in the end, by defending community interest, everyone will end as a winner.
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 16 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (16)