State proposes adding alchohol breath test locks to all carsFollow

Kao, is Leapwater a threat to National Security? Cause it seems he might be posting from a shack in the hills.


Just sayin'

Sniff... sniff... I smell troll.

Don't feed the trolls!


Nat

A Troll that posts on multiple forums and has multiple posts on other topics. /shrug

I.. by no means.. am a regular. And by "regular", I mean the ones that live on this silly board everyday and converse with the inhabitants as if they are actually acquanted, or lovers, or azz-buddies. I just post on the topics worth posting on. And give my humble opinion to the threads that deem worthy of such.

Sometimes, yes. You or any other "addicted" personalities should not be given the right to make your own decisions on said products. Its the "addicted" personalities that are financing and contributing to this problem. If the products werent chemically enhanced to be addictive, then you would have the right to make your own decisions.

Not often do I see a drunk driver careen into an oncoming car which is driven also by a drunk driver. Had that be the case, then I wouldnt give a flyin crap.

2nd hand tobacco smoke is something that I cannot personally control. Its not fair for me not to be able to make that decision for myself. What am I supposed to do..... NOT BREATHE? Therefore It should not be your decision to smoke in my presence (hypothetically speaking). Who gives your choices more importance than mine, or any other human beings?



There really isnt an industry that is in control of this. Its somewhat grown goods, like pot, and for the most part... the people are making the money, not an industry that is free to advertise and brainwash all the sheople into wanting to start.



I agree its a personal thing, but its the advertisements and peer pressure that gets you started, and then its the chemicals put in these that keep you coming back. This is an onset addiction intentially caused to take advantage of you.



I beg to differ. If you light up in a restaurant and me or my family is being bothered, then the restaurant will tell you to do what you dont want to.



Dont get me started on the government. Its as big of an Azz-raper as the tobacco industry.

It's been over a year since I had a drink. And I have no plans to have a drink in the near future. But if I change my mind and have 2 glasses of wine this weekend, I'm a drunk and an addict?

GG

Oh, that's better. Hey guys! He's only picking on the beer drinkers! No, beer drinkers. Yeah, so take your rye and cokes and get out of here! I'm not sure...might be some weird anti-hops and barley faction. Yeah, well grains generally are evil.


This thread is funny. You are right, Leap, no person has the right to infringe upon your _____ time with their "good" time. However, you don't have the right to infringe upon their's either. Really, it comes down to choices. You choose to spend your money doing whatever it is that you do. I choose to spend mine enjoying the occasional beer. I fail to see the connection between the two. Yep, some drunks get in their car and kill people. Yep, some sober people do that too. Yep, some drunks beat their wives. Yep, some sober people do that too.

And you have yet to successfully express why beer drinkers are "drunks".

Actually, I beg to differ. They have and will continue to kill more people than any "mafia" or "mob" or "gang related" source ever could. You say tomato, I say tomata. Whatever.



Dude, dont mock what you dont know. Jesus already has come in his spaceship. The F*ckin Government is just holding him captive at Area 54 because they dont want us all to know the truth. The government or "big brother" is wanting us all to keep reproducing and dying off so that they can reap the rewards.

And I HATE Kool-Aid (<-----spelled correctly).

Thats Area 51 Moron.

I bet you the sort on individual who would sue his parents because hey took him to McDonalds as a 7 year old and now your a fat Obese lard *** and they corrupted you.

well maybe you will when you graduate from junior high.



Edited, Fri Feb 20 14:13:11 2004 by tarv

No it's just that everyone who get grades high enough to get out of Junior high is well aware of Area 51. As for being a fellow believer er no i am firmly rooted in reality thanks very much and i'll stick to Stella Artois.

<--- note the happy expression Leap take that as a hint



Edited, Fri Feb 20 14:15:50 2004 by tarv

Edited, Fri Feb 20 14:16:47 2004 by tarv

How do you even comment on something like this? I wonder how this guy got out of his straight jacket.


Does anyone else see the irony in this? Funny how you you resort to "namecalling" and then claim that only sheep resort to namecalling.

Actually the only word I used that could have been even remotely classified as "namecalling" was the word sheople. This is merely a play on words and nothing inflamatory.

Real "namecalling" would be such that has no point but to attack one personally, rather than intelligently. (see below)








Wow, thats maturity at its finest. You pose a debatable topic, and you get slammed for speaking your mind.

In all honesty, I was playing the part of a "troll". I wanted to see what kind of responses I would get from a board on this subject. My findings will be utilized well. Thank you all.

Bill for ignition interlocks in every vehicle dies in Senate

The bill, which was passed by the House earlier this week, would have required the devices on new vehicles by 2008 and on used vehicles offered for sale by 2009.


Last Update: 02/20/2004 6:58:33 AM
By: Kurt Christopher


A controversial measure to require ignition interlocks on every vehicle sold in New Mexico has died without reaching the floor of the Senate.

The bill, which was passed by the House earlier this week, would have required the devices on new vehicles by 2008 and on used vehicles offered for sale by 2009.

Ignition interlocks prevent vehicles from being started when the driver is drunk.

The measure’s sponsor, Grants Democrat Ken Martinez, says it would save lives. He says putting ignition interlocks on every car, truck and commercial vehicle would shift the focus from punishment to prevention.

New Mexico already requires ignition interlocks for some convicted drunken drivers.

Opponents complained that requiring them on every vehicle would be costly to businesses and to the vast majority of citizens, who obey the law.

The bill never made it out of a Senate committee to the floor before the legislative session ended at noon Thursday.


http://kobtv.com/index.cfm?viewer=storyviewer&id=8765&cat=HOME