Smasharoo wrote:
You just can't do it, can you. Just can't admit to being wrong. Three years or more of posting here and you haven't been wrong once. It's amazing.
No. What's amazing is your eternal attempts to obfuscate the issue with meaningless and unfounded irrelevancies.
Since obviously, I'm not allowed to infer a meaning from any statement you or anyone else makes, then you actually didn't say anything just now. After all, you didn't actually say I am wrong, much less in what way I'm "wrong", or even what I'm wrong about. You just made a vague comment about how I supposedly can't admit I'm wrong.
That's a pathetic approach. Can you please grow a pair and actually say what you mean? Just once. Make a statement that isn't a vaguely phrased implication. Can you even do that?
Are you saying I made a misstatement? And if so, what exactly was it, and how is it wrong? I'd love to hear it. Without the usual Smash innuendo please.
I've provided abundant support (there I go using that word again. Look out!) for my position. You've responded with nothing but vaguely phrased accusations. You can't even make any specific claims becuase it's abundantly obvious to anyone with even a remidial reading level that I'm absolutely right. Kerry made claims that implied that foreign leaders wanted him to win the election. He cannot back up those claims. I believe that shows a duplitious nature on his part. Why is that complicated? What part of that is confusing to you?
I find it amazing that you will call me a liar at the drop of a hat, and in ways that require you to twist a statement I made in ludicrous ways, and insist I "admit I'm wrong" when I'm very clearly not, yet you turn a blind eye when a candidate for President of the US makes a pretty obviously bogus and unfounded statement. And I'm not even saying he's lying. I'm just saying that he should have to back up a claim like that. Why is that so ridiculous?
Double standard much there Smash?