Quote:
Are you accusing me of misquoting you? Did you not state that earlier? If so please provide the corrected quote and I will without hesitation apologize.
No, I'm accusing you of not understanding the language I guess. The quote you've pulled about three times now says "You could etc.." Which means, hypothetically, as you've previously pointed out, one could do something. For example.
You could seek help for your obvious mental handicap and I'd still belittle you.
Now, MORON, is there anything about the above phrase that indicates that you would have allready sought help? You see the word "could" implies that something has not happened yet. I realize it looks a lot like the word "cloud" to you which means big white fluffy things that rain comes out of, so it's confusing, but I'd hope that it's clear now.
Quote:
However, that ISN'T going to happen because you did state it.
Indeed. It'd be nice if you read it accurately. However, that ISN'T going to happen because you're mentally crippled in some signifigant way I'm unaware of I guess.
Quote:
All I'm asking is that you substantiate your assertion with evidence.
What assertion? That you could prove that Christer Bunny wasn't real Christians would still think he was? That's going to be tough to prove, considering I'm not a Christian, but Empyre is and has posted multiple times on this thread that it wouldn't matter to him, he'd still believe.
THUS QED I've proved my assertion. Yay, I win.
Quote:
Is that so hard?
Nope, just did it.
Quote:
You apparently didn't think so when you made the statement, as "conclusively prove beyond any rational doubt" sounds pretty confident to me.
Let me say this again LEARN TO READ. You could spend thirty years learning how to read and still not understand the meaning of the word could. SEE! That doesn't mean you have spent thirty years, now does it?
This sinking in yet, Stephen Hawking?
Quote:
Show us the evidence that gives you this confidence. You seem so sure that an "imbecile" like me is completely wrong, while you're right, so PROVE it. Give your proof for everyone to read.
Allready did. Imbicille.
You're going to realize that at some point while reading this and look back and say *********** what an ingorant *** I am" and then probably stop posting. I look forward to it with great anticipation.
Quote:
Oh, and I'm pretty sure that I remember at least one other post prior to mine asking you to give your "conclusive proof beyond a rational doubt" of the non existence of Christ. So I'm not the only one who thinks you've made that assertion apparently.
Nope, you're the only one, sport.
Other people were making the point that there hasn't been definitive proof that Christer Bunny never existed. Which is I guess, the idiots attempt at arguing that he did. Considering there's no definitive proof that the Easter Bunny never existed, either that wouldn't fill me with confidence of his existence were I them. They weren't operating under the assumption that I was indicating that any such proof had been offered, merely pointing out that it hadn't been.
Not only have you missed the point of my post, you've also missed the point of other people's[b] posts. This would conclusively prove I'm afraid that it's not that I have a problem communicating, but [b]you have a problem understanding.
Forgive me if I refuse to dumb it down to second grade reading level for you.
Get it yet?