AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
I decided recently to catch up on some sci-fi/fantasy classics that I've heard an awful lot about but never read. I read The Golden Compass about a month ago, and just finished reading Dune last week. Now I'm reading the first Drizzt book.
I really enjoyed Golden Compass. Dune: not so much. It was very flat. There wasn't really an exciting climax, I guess because the main protagonist is a very level-headed character. I liked the idea of Dune, and I liked the history that you get glimpses of, like of the galaxy's caste system and so on. But there were too many places where a made-up word or a foreign idea was introduced and not really explained, and too many glimpses into every character's thoughts.
I'm only a few pages into Homeland, the Drizzt book, but I'm already not really enjoying it. I'll read it through though, just to satisfy my curiosity. I've become more and more picky about genre books though. The Lord of the Rings is a hard standard to live up to, but dammit all if I haven't enjoyed reading the ones that come close.
I'ld say to read the sequel to Dune, "Dune Messias", but a lot of people don't enjoy that one as much as the first part. I'ld still recommend it though, the first four parts of the series are amongst the best science fiction I've read, it turns into a more action focused series after that and let's not talk about the books written by Frank Herbert's son and Kevin J. Anderson.
I tried Drizzt too recently, I gave up after about 50 or so pages, I doubt I'll ever retry it.
The most recent book I've read (which has been a while now, sort of lost interest) would be Gregory Betancourt's latest addition to the Amber series. "Shadows of Amber", not as good as his previous trilogy, which definitely wasn't as good as Zelazny's tales. As long as it doesn't get as atrociously bad as the Bladerunner series by Jeter, I'll try and keep up with it.