http://deliveriesgalore.com/2009/03/18/one-trillion-dollars/
This is a very graphic representation of just what it is we are spending these days. Huh.
Totem
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- What does $1 Trillion dollars look like?
What does $1 Trillion dollars look like?Follow
I can't help but feel there's some hidden agenda behind this post. But what could it be?!
I had always suspected 1 trillion dollars looked like 10 billion one-hundred dollar bills, but this confirms it.
I saw one of those grafix at the beggining of the Iraq war, It was for $87billion, wich iirc was the amount that the war was going to cost all up.
I didnt post it back then because I knew I would be ridiculed for my anti-war stance.
Inflation huh!
I didnt post it back then because I knew I would be ridiculed for my anti-war stance.
Inflation huh!
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.
My, oh, my. Cynicism and suspicision around here abounds. The only purpose of this thread was to show just how much cash we are bandying about in terms that we-- I --can understand. I'd be the first to admit that the mere $167 bil Dubya threw at us was eyepopping at the time, but is dwarfed in relation to today's numbers.
Totem
Totem
That picture is my holy grail.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
I suspect that one trillion dollars really just looks like a computer screen reading
$1,000,000,000,000.00
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
I wonder if you could get the same return in weight if I spent the money on hookers and blow.
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
That last pic kinda felt like an easy "Where's Waldo" puzzle.
Iamadam the Shady wrote:
I wonder if you could get the same return in weight if I spent the money on hookers and blow.
You'd need to solve a group of linear equations.
Average_hooker_mass*x + mass_of_blow_per_gram*y = 10,000,000,000*hundred_dollar_mass
Average_hooker_price*x + price_blow_per_gram*y = $1,000,000,000,000
Where x and y would be the quantity of hookers and blow required.
Allegory wrote:
Iamadam the Shady wrote:
I wonder if you could get the same return in weight if I spent the money on hookers and blow.
You'd need to solve a group of linear equations.
Average_hooker_mass*x + mass_of_blow_per_gram*y = 10,000,000,000*hundred_dollar_mass
Average_hooker_price*x + price_blow_per_gram*y = $1,000,000,000,000
Where x and y would be the quantity of hookers and blow required.
Being the sort of person who enjoys hookers and blow, I don't think I'll be solving linear equations anytime soon.
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
Wrong again, Totem. 1 Trillion dollars looks like this. (Closeup)
Edited, Apr 8th 2009 10:30am by bsphil
Edited, Apr 8th 2009 10:30am by bsphil
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Totem wrote:
http://deliveriesgalore.com/2009/03/18/one-trillion-dollars/
This is a very graphic representation of just what it is we are spending these days. Huh.
Totem
This is a very graphic representation of just what it is we are spending these days. Huh.
Totem
I'm still confused and can't relate to anything in the picture. Can you put one up with a comparison to your two dollar ***** of a mom?
No, sorry, Mental, for a two-pump chump like yourself depictions of my mom in monetary terms of your sexual stamina would take more bandwidth than what the interwebs could possibly handle.
But good luck with that early ejac problem, sport.
Totem
But good luck with that early ejac problem, sport.
Totem
Totem wrote:
But good luck with that early ejac problem, sport.
Totem
Totem
Oh, it's not a problem for me.
I'd be the first to admit that the mere $167 bil Dubya threw at us was eyepopping at the time, but is dwarfed in relation to today's numbers.
It's amazing how quickly Obama caused a massive financial meltdown costing us Trillions, isn't it? Years before he took office, that brother is good.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
"Oh, it's not a problem for me." --Mental
Heh, yeah, cuz all the ladies like it when you ninja-sperm them, right? Get in without them even realizing it, finish the job quick-quick-quick, and leave before they knew what happened. Oh, you're a cocksman alright.
/smirk
Totem
Heh, yeah, cuz all the ladies like it when you ninja-sperm them, right? Get in without them even realizing it, finish the job quick-quick-quick, and leave before they knew what happened. Oh, you're a cocksman alright.
/smirk
Totem
I'd like to see that picture converted into other things. Like a trillion dollar's worth of Columbian blow or White Castle hamburgers or twenty-five cent gumballs.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Smasharoo wrote:
I'd be the first to admit that the mere $167 bil Dubya threw at us was eyepopping at the time, but is dwarfed in relation to today's numbers.
It's amazing how quickly Obama caused a massive financial meltdown costing us Trillions, isn't it? Years before he took office, that brother is good.
Let's be fair here though. The meltdown itself didn't cost us a dollar. It's the "fixes" that are costing so much money. We can debate which things are necessary and all that, but let's not ignore that the decision to spend money is made "now".
Unless you're arguing that the decision to spend the most recent 800ish Billion dollars on stimulus was made by anyone other than the people currently sitting in office? Cause that would be a neat trick for Republicans to continue writing legislation two years after they lost control of both houses and for Bush to continue to hold veto power even though he's not president anymore...
Obama didn't inherit the spending he and the Dems are doing right now, so let's not push that little cart too far up the hill, shall we?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
The meltdown itself didn't cost us a dollar.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Quote:
Let's be fair here though. The meltdown itself didn't cost us a dollar.
Just like it doesn't cost us a dollar if the dollar is hyperinflated by printing money, you mean? I mean, **** real value, so long as we still have the same number of dollars, it's cool.
As my financial planner keeps telling me it's not real until I take the money in my 401(k) out. In the meantime it's just a number on a calculator.
Are you arguing, Smash, that those evil, evil Republicans piled up the combustables that fueled this fiasco, and that Dubya lit the $167 bil match? If so, what were all the Dems doing during this time? Singing campfire songs, roasting weinies, and making smores? While I could agree Obama was given this mess, saying that the responsibility for creating our present situation falls solely at the other party's feet is as intellectually dishonest as a Bernie Madoff investment opportunity.
Totem
Are you arguing, Smash, that those evil, evil Republicans piled up the combustables that fueled this fiasco, and that Dubya lit the $167 bil match? If so, what were all the Dems doing during this time? Singing campfire songs, roasting weinies, and making smores? While I could agree Obama was given this mess, saying that the responsibility for creating our present situation falls solely at the other party's feet is as intellectually dishonest as a Bernie Madoff investment opportunity.
Totem
Totem wrote:
As my financial planner keeps telling me it's not real until I take the money in my 401(k) out. In the meantime it's just a number on a calculator.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
gbaji wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
I'd be the first to admit that the mere $167 bil Dubya threw at us was eyepopping at the time, but is dwarfed in relation to today's numbers.
It's amazing how quickly Obama caused a massive financial meltdown costing us Trillions, isn't it? Years before he took office, that brother is good.
Let's be fair here though. The meltdown itself didn't cost us a dollar. It's the "fixes" that are costing so much money. We can debate which things are necessary and all that, but let's not ignore that the decision to spend money is made "now".
Unless you're arguing that the decision to spend the most recent 800ish Billion dollars on stimulus was made by anyone other than the people currently sitting in office? Cause that would be a neat trick for Republicans to continue writing legislation two years after they lost control of both houses and for Bush to continue to hold veto power even though he's not president anymore...
Obama didn't inherit the spending he and the Dems are doing right now, so let's not push that little cart too far up the hill, shall we?
What are you getting at here? That Obama shouldn't spend any money to fix this crisis? I think that's a great idea. Just call it all even and there's no more problem.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Scholar
30 posts
Being rather young, and in debt for furthering my education, I wouldn't be opposed to wiping the entire global economy slate clean. I'm tired of all these little pieces of paper in my pocket, I would much rather trade you my chicken for your biscuit. But then again, I'm studying medicine not economics.
Recent Visitors: 319
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (319)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- What does $1 Trillion dollars look like?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC