It's interesting how a different perspective can change one's mind sometimes.
Quote:
Despite the fact that you might expect that a city with millions of inhabitants would offer plenty of options for discussion at the blog, the five posts there (all of which appeared in August of last year) all have the tag Liskula, and appear to involve personal, rather than professional photography.
Aside from the personal pics, the entries contain a lot of vitriol, such as, "How old is this *****? 40 something? She's a psychotic, lying, whoring, still going to clubs at her age, *****." (Ms. Cohen, for the record, is younger than 40.) Her suit argues that this, and the tiny bits of other text that appeared at ****** in NYC constitute defamation. Since the blogger is anonymous, however, there is an extra legal hurdle between Cohen and whatever financial revenge she seeks.
Sounds very much like someone with a personal grudge aiming to harm her or her career. Might even be a fellow model. I'm not so opposed to the revelation of the blogger's identity, given the alternate perspective, though I do still think it's a bad precedent.
