Texas killed innocent manFollow

Do you know who else killed innocent people?

Texas maintains control over a state the size of a small country by instilling as much fear in the populace as possible. As Texas is the only state to join the union as a country with it's own federal government, that state has secession rights should it choose to leave the Union. To prevent breakdown of law and order it is essential that the Texas government maintain a reputation of intolerance toward crime that is strictly and fatally enforced. Particularly since the official stance of Texas is against Obama's government, and Texas could pretty much go at any time if Obama doesn't play poker right. That said Yes Texas does have a quota, and no they don't care he was innocent.

Texas maintains control over a state the size of a small country by instilling as much fear in the populace as possible. As Texas is the only state to join the union as a country with it's own federal government, that state has secession rights should it choose to leave the Union. To prevent breakdown of law and order it is essential that the Texas government maintain a reputation of intolerance toward crime that is strictly and fatally enforced. Particularly since the official stance of Texas is against Obama's government, and Texas could pretty much go at any time if Obama doesn't play poker right. That said Yes Texas does have a quota, and no they don't care he was innocent.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress doth consent that the territory properly included within and rightfully belonging to the Republic of Texas, may be erected into a new State to be called the State of Texas, with a republican form of government adopted by the people of said Republic, by deputies in convention assembled, with the consent of the existing Government in order that the same may by admitted as one of the States of this Union.

2nd. And be it further resolved, That the foregoing consent of Congress is given upon the following conditions, to wit: First, said state to be formed, subject to the adjustment by this government of all questions of boundary that may arise with other government, --and the Constitution thereof, with the proper evidence of its adoption by the people of said Republic of Texas, shall be transmitted to the President of the United States, to be laid before Congress for its final action on, or before the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and forty-six. Second, said state when admitted into the Union, after ceding to the United States all public edifices, fortifications, barracks, ports and harbors, navy and navy yards, docks, magazines and armaments, and all other means pertaining to the public defense, belonging to the said Republic of Texas, shall retain funds, debts, taxes and dues of every kind which may belong to, or be due and owing to the said Republic; and shall also retain all the vacant and unappropriated lands lying within its limits, to be applied to the payment of the debts and liabilities of said Republic of Texas, and the residue of said lands, after discharging said debts and liabilities, to be disposed of as said State may direct; but in no event are said debts and liabilities to become a charge upon the Government of the United States. Third -- New States of convenient size not exceeding four in number, in addition to said State of Texas and having sufficient population, may, hereafter by the consent of said State, be formed out of the territory thereof, which shall be entitled to admission under the provisions of the Federal Constitution; and such states as may be formed out of the territory lying south of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, commonly known as the Missouri Compromise Line, shall be admitted into the Union, with or without slavery, as the people of each State, asking admission shall desire; and in such State or States as shall be formed out of said territory, north of said Missouri compromise Line, slavery, or involuntary servitude (except for crime) shall be prohibited."

Texas killed an innocent man? Say it ain't so!

Didn't someone say the other day something like "If a child in Uganda dies of starvation, it's a terrible thing too, but no one would act shocked." This is sort of the same thing. Terrible, but not shocking.

Oh, they use the Needle in Texas?

Fixed?

There is a chance, however, that Texas could become the first state to acknowledge officially that, since the advent of the modern judicial system, it had carried out the “execution of a legally and factually innocent person.”

Well, even that assessment is wrong. Didn't Indiana or someplace declare a DP moratorium after it came to light that an executed man was factually innocent?