- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Classy Democrats
Classy DemocratsFollow
The One and Only toohotforu wrote:
Catt wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Catt,
Tell that to the italians. The more obese the hotter chic you get. Really blew my mind.
Catt wrote:
That still doesn't mean gorge yourself into a stupor over several hours.
Tell that to the italians. The more obese the hotter chic you get. Really blew my mind.
It's like that in some countries. Some men and occasionally women prefer a heavier partner.
This is true, I personally prefer a man with a little more meat on his bones. Now I don't want to have to cut them out of their house or anything like that but I prefer men over 200lbs. Something about bean poles that does nothing for me.
Toohotforu wrote:
Just punch her in the vag and tell her to @#$% off.
Varrus, do you work for AllState? I know you work for one of these insurance companies.
Toohotforu wrote:
Just punch her in the vag and tell her to @#$% off.
That pomegranate does look entertaining and delicious.
Too bad they're such a mess to eat that I only allow myself one each season.
Too bad they're such a mess to eat that I only allow myself one each season.
#281ThiefX,
Posted: Oct 15 2009 at 3:49 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Name 2 Negative Quotes from Rush Limbaugh that were directed at Black Athletes?
"Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."
Why would the NFL want to have a man who said that representing them in any way?
ETA: before you even ***** about a second one:
"I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve."
Edited, Oct 15th 2009 5:02pm by Sweetums
Why would the NFL want to have a man who said that representing them in any way?
ETA: before you even ***** about a second one:
"I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve."
Edited, Oct 15th 2009 5:02pm by Sweetums
ThiefX wrote:
Oh and for the record it was a few NFL owners and A few NFL players noteven close to all of them or even half of them.
Does it matter?
It is well within the rights of the NFL to deny the sale. Period.
Obama could try to buy the Rams and if the NFL didn't want him to, they could say no. Their reasons don't really matter. It's not a democracy.
The only way Rush is going to get back near the NFL is to buy the Raiders, because anyone has to be better than Al Davis.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
#285ThiefX,
Posted: Oct 15 2009 at 4:52 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) LMAO this is it this it what you got? This is your "mutiple racial comments thrown at black athletes?
Rush is a shock jock and nothing more. He has publicly stated that his main goal is to say whatever it takes to get ratings. He stirs up trouble at any opportunity because when he does, he gets more listeners. Any attempts to take him seriously are simply misguided.
I like eating pomegranates and imagining an ancient Greek being shocked at my doing so.
ThiefX wrote:
Maybe you should actually listen to Rush sometime instead of letting other peole tell you things dumbass.
I listen to Rush all the time. What's your favorite album? Mine's Moving Pictures.
Love,
PunkFloyd
PunkFloyd
Grandfather Driftwood wrote:
Quote:
Remind me again how many thousands Saddam murdered this year.
You seem to ignore the fact that his killing of his own people was none of our goddamn business.
Considering how you guys handed him the very weapons he used on his people... Guess you're right.
manicshock wrote:
Grandfather Driftwood wrote:
Quote:
Remind me again how many thousands Saddam murdered this year.
You seem to ignore the fact that his killing of his own people was none of our goddamn business.
Considering how you guys handed him the very weapons he used on his people... Guess you're right.
"You guys"? You mean the Republican regimes of the 80s?
varus, in another thread, wrote:
Pretty much. Reagan was a great leader; he defeated communist Russia, much to the chagrin of the liberal left.
Thanks, Ronnie. What a great President.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Debalic wrote:
manicshock wrote:
Grandfather Driftwood wrote:
Quote:
Remind me again how many thousands Saddam murdered this year.
You seem to ignore the fact that his killing of his own people was none of our goddamn business.
Considering how you guys handed him the very weapons he used on his people... Guess you're right.
"You guys"? You mean the Republican regimes of the 80s?
Well I was really denoting that to US. I've got no doubt that conservatives make mistakes. I wasn't really aiming it at the republicans, mostly just that "you guys" have to clean it up now. You know, like how he should've been cleaned up in the early 90s by desert storm but because it was just turning into a slaughter the people stopped it? You can blame Bush all you want, but Iraq could've easily been cleared up then and been a far more manageable case now given troops and letting the generals have their way.
manicshock wrote:
Well I was really denoting that to US.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
PunkFloyd, King of Bards wrote:
ThiefX wrote:
Maybe you should actually listen to Rush sometime instead of letting other peole tell you things dumbass.
I listen to Rush all the time. What's your favorite album? Mine's Moving Pictures.
And the men who hold high places
Must be the ones who start
To mold a new reality
Closer to the heart, closer to the heart
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,
I'm not saying they don't have the right to. What I am saying is that owners saying Rush will hurt the leagues image is BS. I am saying that sports/political pundits are fabricating quotes and attributing them to Rush to kill this. I am saying it seems unamerican to deny someone the oppurtunity to buy something based on their political preference.
Edited, Oct 14th 2009 3:08pm by publiusvarus
I'm not saying they don't have the right to. What I am saying is that owners saying Rush will hurt the leagues image is BS. I am saying that sports/political pundits are fabricating quotes and attributing them to Rush to kill this. I am saying it seems unamerican to deny someone the oppurtunity to buy something based on their political preference.
Edited, Oct 14th 2009 3:08pm by publiusvarus
Its not based on political preference though. He is a general douche who does whatever he can to get ratings. The two that stick out in my mind are him imitating Michael J Fox's Parkinson's disease and his long history of having harsh words for pot users then he goes ahead and abuses oxycontin because he was "in so much pain." Well Rush, you dipshÃt, thats one of the reasons people take illegal drugs is because they are in physical pain or they are struggling with emotional issues.
You kick people out of your office for cursing, and the NFL didnt want a hypocritical, ratings-grabbing dÃckbag for an owner. Both your stance and the NFL's stance are based on moral grounds, even if they used some of Rush's lesser sins as an excuse. Same diff.
Edited, Oct 28th 2009 8:26am by ManifestOfKujata
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
manicshock wrote:
Well I was really denoting that to US.
It's a safe bet that most of the people posting here are from the US. The only other significantly represented nation would be the UK, I guess.
And while I hate to say "Manicshock has a point," Manicshock has a point. If Saddam was going to be ousted, the best time to do it was 1991, when his regime was weak and international support was high. The twelve-year wait only gave more time for Iraq's population to die of dysentry while Saddam diverted international aid funds to build palaces.
A better option would be not getting involved at all, but really, America was already involved.
zepoodle wrote:
It's a safe bet that most of the people posting here are from the US. The only other significantly represented nation would be the UK, I guess.
Also, you forgot about Canada, like most others do. There is a fairly large number of Canadians posting here. I'd guess slightly behind the UK, but enough to warrant mention if the UK gets mentioned.
Regardless, the point is if you're not from the US, why would you assume that everyone else must be?
Quote:
A better option would be not getting involved at all, but really, America was already involved.
Edited, Oct 28th 2009 9:57am by Uglysasquatch
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Kujata,
You know this is the MO for about half of the current NFL owners right?
Yet the NFL, who is oh so conerned about their image, allows murderers, crack heads, dog fighters, people who bring guns to clubs, people who incite riots, and all other sorts of unsavory characters back on the field. Come one even you can see the hypocracy in this.
Quote:
You kick people out of your office for cursing, and the NFL didnt want a hypocritical, ratings-grabbing dÃckbag for an owner.
You know this is the MO for about half of the current NFL owners right?
Quote:
Both your stance and the NFL's stance are based on moral grounds, even if they used some of Rush's lesser sins as an excuse. Same diff.
Yet the NFL, who is oh so conerned about their image, allows murderers, crack heads, dog fighters, people who bring guns to clubs, people who incite riots, and all other sorts of unsavory characters back on the field. Come one even you can see the hypocracy in this.
Hey, they should be thrown out too - just like most of the management of the Patriots, because it signals cheating is cool if they remain.
Rush is an idiot, but being from the Philly area myself, Rush was right about McNabb: he sucks as a QB.
And he frequents a movie theater around my brother in law's house (my bro in law used to work there in college); McNabb demands to get in for free and then when the manager says "hey, we let you in for free, can you sign a few autographs for my workers" McNabb has refused. Eff McNabb too.
Edited, Oct 28th 2009 12:17pm by ManifestOfKujata
Rush is an idiot, but being from the Philly area myself, Rush was right about McNabb: he sucks as a QB.
And he frequents a movie theater around my brother in law's house (my bro in law used to work there in college); McNabb demands to get in for free and then when the manager says "hey, we let you in for free, can you sign a few autographs for my workers" McNabb has refused. Eff McNabb too.
Edited, Oct 28th 2009 12:17pm by ManifestOfKujata
Kuja,
That's the thing Rush didn't say Mcnabb sucked. He did say that the sports media takes it easy on him because he's a black quarterback.
That's the thing Rush didn't say Mcnabb sucked. He did say that the sports media takes it easy on him because he's a black quarterback.
publiusvarus wrote:
Kuja,
That's the thing Rush didn't say Mcnabb sucked. He did say that the sports media takes it easy on him because he's a black quarterback.
That's the thing Rush didn't say Mcnabb sucked. He did say that the sports media takes it easy on him because he's a black quarterback.
He should have said McNabb sucked then, right?
I mean, otherwise he's just another cog in the Liberal Black Quarterback Conspiracy.
publiusvarus wrote:
Yet the NFL, who is oh so conerned about their image, allows murderers, crack heads, dog fighters, people who bring guns to clubs, people who incite riots, and all other sorts of unsavory characters back on the field. Come one even you can see the hypocracy in this.
Maybe the NFL thinks that crack heads & dog fighters have more redeeming positive qualities than Rush.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Recent Visitors: 370
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (370)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Classy Democrats
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC