Barkingturtle wrote:
Quote:
The elderly have a higher resist rate,
Thus not in the "at risk" group, you f
Ucking ***-guzzling sh*t-brain.
You do understand that "at risk" means "more likely to contract", right? No? Oh! Well that explains how you've managed to look like such a f
Ucking dipsh*t while going on about how elderly/sickly people should be getting vaccinated.
How convienent of you to lop of the rest of my quote which says they are more likely to die if the do get it. But whatever makes you feel like a big man.
Barkingturtle wrote:
You do understand that "at risk" means "more likely to contract"
Oh, so you are defining "at risk" now, you unoriginal, played-out insult slinger? To me, death means "more at risk."
Barkingturtle wrote:
Here's the sh*t for you, you f
Ucking monumental assf
Uck:
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1913615,00.html
Quote:
The 15-member panel of doctors, scientists, vaccine experts, public-health officials and a citizen representative came up with five core populations they believe should receive the first wave of H1N1/09 immunization. These include pregnant women, people living in households with babies under 6 months old (since infants cannot be immunized, they must be protected by preventing illness in those around them), emergency medical personnel who are likely to be in contact with infected patients, young people between 6 months and 24 years old, and nonelderly individuals who have underlying conditions, such as asthma, respiratory illness or a compromised immune system, that put them at higher risk of flu complications.
So you gave an article that says that and I gave an article that says they are more likely to die if they do get it. Why not be safe and just get it then?
Also, good job on reading the entire article. It goes on about who should get flu shots:
Quote:
That could still change, but at least for now, says Schuchat, local and state health authorities will have some guidelines for deciding who should get vaccinated if it becomes necessary.
So my article says the elderly are less likely to get it and more likely to die. Your article says they are less likely to get it and arent high on the list to be vaccinated, but that could change. Sounds like its not set in stone.
Barkingturtle wrote:
Now go be someone else's *****, I am ******* tired of you.
If you are tired of me, then just dont respond. But face it, you love it. In fact, you cant help to respond, so all I have to do is post and you will. Maybe you are my *****. Dance for me and post back, my puppet!
Oh well, maybe you are just too busy swallowing an infinite amount of head in a field like your avatar suggests. The only thing that would make it more true to life is if it was in a back alley and we gave you lipstick, fake boobs, and fishnet stickings.