publiusvarus wrote:
Jophed,
Must be nice to live a life where double standards are the norm; I wouldn't know.
Just so I get this straight you're actually saying cheating on your wife, lying to a grand jury, having your law license suspended, and then lying to the american people about what happened, then having to apologize to everyone once you've been found out wouldn't affect someones job performance. Right...
The judicial process certainly would. The cheating in and of itself doesn't affect job performance.
We should be fair to the guy in the article, however. I mean, he was on his lunch break; it's not like he was working at the time. I believe it's not fair that he was fired, but hey, not my office, not my rules.
Edit: In the same way, Sanford wouldn't be affected if he had an affair in general. But the particulars made it a terrible decision, for all the reasons given before. The affair DID directly affect his performance.
Edited, Oct 28th 2009 4:05pm by LockeColeMA