Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Hate Crimes Bill signedFollow

#27 Oct 29 2009 at 6:08 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,137 posts
CBD wrote:

It is a lot easier to take your stance on hate crimes when, to take a personal example, you aren't the one having to worry about getting murdered for holding hands with the person you love. You can understand the fear, but living it is something entirely different.



Maybe not so much from gays, but I sure as hell do have to worry about being murdered by racist blacks, just as much as black people should worry about being murdered by racist whites.

It is very presumptuous that you assume I am from a lilly white neighborhood. I grew up in the poor section of town just outside of Philly - so I was exposed to / thrown in with all kinds of people of mixed beliefs and races, and I have had my fair share of discrimination thrown at me.

As an example, I was once walking home from school when three people - two black kids and a white kid - approached me. They were MUCH bigger than I was, and there was no way I was running due to carrying a $1k instrument that I wasnt about to leave behind. Anyway, they easily catch up to me and the black kids start going through my backpack and pockets looking through money. they destroyed a few things in my bookbag because I was poor and had no money on me (guess they didnt realize how much a saxophone is worth), and the only reason they stopped is because I recognized the white kid and could ID them. Naturally, the next day at school I turned them in, and their defense was "he called me the N word (but actually said it)." Fortunately, I had a clean record, the other three kids had a long history, and I was a goofy kid with a sax who couldnt possibly intimidate anyone, so it turned out the school administrators justly found that kid to be lying and I wasnt slandered with being racist. I took it to the cops, and the detective told me the kid was part of a gang; and that if I were to press charges, my life would have been in danger.

I got off relatively easy, but not all of my friends were so lucky. One of them was with 2-3 other friends coming out of a bar. They left the bar and one of them was waaaayyyy ahead of the rest. A black guy sucker punched the one ahead - not knowing the others were behind - and started going through his wallet. The others saw what happened and caught up and started fighting. Since it was Philly and cops are all over the bar district, a cop quickly saw it and arrested my friend and his friends - and let the mugger go, because he claimed he was jumped. Fast forward a few months later, while the "hate crime" trial (and yes, hate crime charges were brought) was going on the guy mugged a 16 year old in the same fashion but it was dismissed as evidence - which should have proved that my friend defending his friend from being mugged was not motivated by a hate crime. Now this hate crime is permanently on their record, all because a black guy tried to mug a white guy without realizing his friends were 200 feet behind him. This is one of the big reasons I am not behind hate crime laws, because I have personally seen them be used when there was absolutely no reason to, and my friend was convicted of it just for being white.

One of my other friends was beat within an inch of his life just for being white in a black neighborhood - the only way he got out with his life was he claimed he had AIDs and spit blood all over a few of their faces.

Another one of my friends was told - while walking through a black neighborhood -he "doesnt belong there" and to "leave now whitey."

Another one of my friends was almost beat within an inch of his life by black kids wanting to beat up a white kid; ironically, a black drug dealer who knew my friend and liked him scared them away with a gun.

So to say me - or straight white males - arent the ones who "have to worry" about just walking down the street while white and have never "had to live it" is way of the mark, because I sure have. Maybe there are parts of the country where that is true, but its certainly not in and around Philadelphia.

And, just to throw in an example about gay people hating, the guy who sits in front of me at work used to work for a gay man who owned the company. he actually, in some bizarre move, took out pregnancy being covered in his health plan and told people it was because he didnt want to support heterosexuals. My friend soon quit and the business went under. That kind of situation is rare, but it can happen and has happened.

And fortunately I realize that most black people - or gay, or asian, or muslim, or whatever - are just looking to live, dont want any trouble, and are productive members of society; unfortunately, after some of their experiences, some of my friends dont think that to be the case.

I am also fortunate (or unfortunate if you cant make lemonade) because I have been exposed to the idea that non-white, non-straight, non-male people can be just as racist, sexist, or heterophobic than the whitest grand dragon.

Lets be real. You assumed that since I was a straight white guy, I have never had to live in fear based off the fact that I was straight or white. It was way off base, but thats the problem: when it comes to discrimination, most people wont even entertain the fact that hate crimes are just as rampant in minorities and that the white guy is always the perpetrator or the guy who "just doesnt understand." Idiocy isnt just contained in straight white people.


Edited, Oct 29th 2009 8:14am by ManifestOfKujata

Edited, Oct 29th 2009 8:15am by ManifestOfKujata
#28 Oct 29 2009 at 6:16 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Ambrya wrote:

In theory, hate crime legislation should be everything I believe in. I support the rights of minorities whole-heartedly, and find violence against them abhorrent. But I also find the notion of the thought police equally abhorrent. Yes, "state of mind" is permissible in some legal cases, but heaping on extra punishment not for what someone DID but for what they believe just doesn't sit right with me.


Haven't looked at this topic since now, but Ambrya, I completely disagree with you. As has already been said, hate crimes are crimes done because someone represents something. If Joe Shmoe gets killed in a bar fight, we don't worry about it. If Joe Shmoe gets killed because he was gay/black/Muslim/looks like David Hasslehoff, then people who are gay/black/Muslim/The Hoff get worried and feel threatened just for being who they are or believing what they believe.

This legislation is a good thing, and I am so glad it was passed. A few of my gay friends have openly wept because people they know have been attacked simply for being together at the wrong place, wrong time. The extra protection is needed in their lives in a way it has never been needed in my own. After all, I'm not gay/black/Muslim/The Hoff.

Edit: Said article, meant topic.

Edited, Oct 29th 2009 8:22am by LockeColeMA
#29 Oct 29 2009 at 6:17 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
And fortunately I realize that most black people - or gay, or asian, or muslim, or whatever - are just looking to live, dont want any trouble, and are productive members of society; unfortunately, after some of their experiences, some of my friends dont think that to be the case.


Guess that's why they keep committing hate crimes, eh?
#30 Oct 29 2009 at 6:22 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
ManifestOfKujata wrote:
-Rant-


Lets be real. You assumed that since I was a straight white guy, I have never had to live in fear based off the fact that I was straight or white. It was way off base, but thats the problem: when it comes to discrimination, most people wont even entertain the fact that hate crimes are just as rampant in minorities and that the white guy is always the perpetrator or the guy who "just doesnt understand." Idiocy isnt just contained in straight white people.


I'm not seeing the issue. The next time you get jumped by a black guy, as it seems you are in constant fear of having happen, tell your lawyer you want to charge it as a hate crime if you get called whitey.

Yes, you'll probably get laughed at. But if the law is on your side and you honestly think you got jumped because you were white and for no other reason, then go for it.
#31 Oct 29 2009 at 6:40 AM Rating: Good
***
1,137 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:

I'm not seeing the issue. The next time you get jumped by a black guy, as it seems you are in constant fear of having happen, tell your lawyer you want to charge it as a hate crime if you get called whitey.

Yes, you'll probably get laughed at. But if the law is on your side and you honestly think you got jumped because you were white and for no other reason, then go for it.


Dont you see the problem with that though? Why should I be laughed at if I am discriminated against? Hate crime should be a serious crime, and should be used when one race is using race to intimidate another. Using a racially charged excuse - saying "he called me the N-word" when you are lying to weasel your way out of being charged with attempted robbery - is a hate crime. If he was believed, I could have been charged with a hate crime and my reputation would have been damaged forever.

I know you see that, and I am not disagreeing with you, but your "you'll probably get laughed at" comment is at the heart of the issue: a discrimination crime against a white guy isnt taken as seriously. Thats one of the main reasons I feel hate crime litigation wont work for our country just yet, because as a country we would laugh at a white guy making that claim.

Edited, Oct 29th 2009 8:44am by ManifestOfKujata
#32 Oct 29 2009 at 6:47 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
because as a country we would laugh at a white guy making that claim.


Well it certainly won't get to the point of taking hate seriously if we won't consider any hate seriously. What is your alternative way to progress to that point? Sometimes you just need stuff in the legislation that's not applied perfectly, and work on its application after the fact.

Kind of like the constitution!
#33 Oct 29 2009 at 6:50 AM Rating: Decent
*****
12,049 posts
ManifestOfKujata wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:

I'm not seeing the issue. The next time you get jumped by a black guy, as it seems you are in constant fear of having happen, tell your lawyer you want to charge it as a hate crime if you get called whitey.

Yes, you'll probably get laughed at. But if the law is on your side and you honestly think you got jumped because you were white and for no other reason, then go for it.


Dont you see the problem with that though? Why should I be laughed at if I am discriminated against? Hate crime should be a serious crime, and should be used when one race is using race to intimidate another. Using a racially charged excuse - saying "he called me the N-word" when you are lying to weasel your way out of being charged with attempted robbery - is a hate crime. If he was believed, I could have been charged with a hate crime and my reputation would have been damaged forever.

I know you see that, and I am not disagreeing with you, but your "you'll probably get laughed at" comment is at the heart of the issue: a discrimination crime against a white guy isnt taken as seriously. Thats one of the main reasons I feel hate crime litigation wont work for our country just yet, because as a country we would laugh at a white guy making that claim.

Edited, Oct 29th 2009 8:44am by ManifestOfKujata


I disagree. Because of errors, it should not be implemented? While it might not work as well for white folks, I honestly don't believe that we're the victims of hate crimes anywhere near as often as other groups. I agree it would be better if a mugger got a few extra years because he attacked you simply due to your race; but odds are his primary motive was your money. Putting a homophobe behind bars for several extra years because he attacked a guy couple simply for holding hands SHOULD happen.

I guess what I mean is, I agree, it isn't a perfect system. But it provides extra protection for some. Just because you might not get as much from it as other groups doesn't mean it shouldn't be signed into law. It just means we have a ways to go. There's no doubt in my mind that this is a darn good first step.
#34 Oct 29 2009 at 6:58 AM Rating: Good
***
1,137 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
because as a country we would laugh at a white guy making that claim.


Well it certainly won't get to the point of taking hate seriously if we won't consider any hate seriously. What is your alternative way to progress to that point? Sometimes you just need stuff in the legislation that's not applied perfectly, and work on its application after the fact.

Kind of like the constitution!


I do see your point. I am for anti-discrimination laws, and if it can be proven outside of a he-said-she-said scenario, I think people should either beheavily fined or jailed depending on the offense.

As for hate crime laws - if it can be proven its a hate crime, I have no problems with it. Recently there was a skinhead who would drive into Philly looking for minorities to kill - that is definitely a hate crime, and that guy should be charged appropriately and either given a life sentencec or executed. But the problem is, so should have that black kid I mentioned earlier. It happened in the same town with the same DA.

There are also instances where "hate crime" is used, but the only extenuating circumstance to prove it was a hate crime was it was a white guy who committed a violent crime against a black guy. If that was cleared up, I would be perfectly fine with them.
#35 Oct 29 2009 at 7:02 AM Rating: Good
***
1,137 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:

I guess what I mean is, I agree, it isn't a perfect system. But it provides extra protection for some. Just because you might not get as much from it as other groups doesn't mean it shouldn't be signed into law. It just means we have a ways to go. There's no doubt in my mind that this is a darn good first step.


I can see your point, and I agree - maybe we shouldnt hold back because it isnt perfect. However, we should also be taking steps to eliminate the thought that ony straight whites can commit these crimes. That would probably ease any clouds around an imperfect system.

Racism is a multi-layered problem, which has to be adressed from my different angles by all parties involved. And hell, part of my motivation for wanting it to end is, as a white guy, is I am tired of being lumped in with rednecks. Pennsylvania is a weird place, we are a blue state and we have many progressive ideas and programs, but we also have one of the highest concentrations of the KKK.

EDIT: If I may ask, where do you live?

DOUBLE EDIT: Heh, Actually read the bottom of your posting. What is Gainseville like?


Edited, Oct 29th 2009 9:18am by ManifestOfKujata
#36REDACTED, Posted: Oct 29 2009 at 7:39 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) CBD,
#37 Oct 29 2009 at 7:51 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Well, at least one of the perpetrators (maybe all, I don't know) of the beating Reginald Denny (the white fella who got beaten by 4 black guys in the wake of the Rodney King trial) was convicted of attempted murder. That was a racially driven attack so I think it qualifies as a hate crime.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#38 Oct 29 2009 at 7:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Old article from '95 but it proves my point well enough and I'm too lazy to do the rest of your Googling for you:
Chicago Reporter wrote:
Chicago police have recorded five crimes against Asian Americans already this year, compared to one last year and four in 1993. Eight anti-Arab offenses have been reported, compared to seven in 1994.

Hate crimes against whites dropped by 20 percent, to 32, the third consecutive year of decline.
[...]
Since the Simpson verdict, Chicago police have recorded three hate crimes in which the attackers mentioned Simpson's name. Two of the incidents were directed against blacks and one against a white person, Bednarkiewicz said.

Since 1992, 117 out of 275 hate crimes against blacks took place in census tracts that are more than 75 percent white, the analysis shows. In contrast, 57 of the 237 and-white crimes took place in tracts more than 75 percent black.

Logic would dictate that if the police are tracking hate crime arrests (against whites or whoever) that there's some convictions coming out of it. In Chicago from 1992 to 1994, they tracked 237 against whites.

That was easy. You should buy one of the Googlenetting machines. They have all sorts of answers in them!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Oct 29 2009 at 7:58 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
ManifestOfKujata wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:

I guess what I mean is, I agree, it isn't a perfect system. But it provides extra protection for some. Just because you might not get as much from it as other groups doesn't mean it shouldn't be signed into law. It just means we have a ways to go. There's no doubt in my mind that this is a darn good first step.


I can see your point, and I agree - maybe we shouldnt hold back because it isnt perfect. However, we should also be taking steps to eliminate the thought that ony straight whites can commit these crimes. That would probably ease any clouds around an imperfect system.

Racism is a multi-layered problem, which has to be adressed from my different angles by all parties involved. And hell, part of my motivation for wanting it to end is, as a white guy, is I am tired of being lumped in with rednecks. Pennsylvania is a weird place, we are a blue state and we have many progressive ideas and programs, but we also have one of the highest concentrations of the KKK.

EDIT: If I may ask, where do you live?

DOUBLE EDIT: Heh, Actually read the bottom of your posting. What is Gainseville like?


Grew up in MA, went to college in DE, work in FL. Gainesville is an interesting mix. It's a college town (city? We have 40,000 students), and one of the biggest party schools in the country. There are all sorts of folks around here; more minorities than at UDel, but still predominantly white. Get a good mix of rednecks and academics; cars have stickers ranging from "Coexist" in religious symbols to "JESUS IS LORD" all over their back window; from "Obama '08" to "OUR GOVERNMENT IS RUN BY LIARS" (saw that yesterday and laughed).

Overall it's a pretty good cross-section of cultures, with the common thread being intoxication and youth. I enjoy it.

Plus our football beats the **** out of Tennessee's. Looking at you, Varus.
#40 Oct 29 2009 at 9:13 AM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
The Australians approached the problem from a sensible direction. We herded all our black people into Tasmania, and then we shot them.
#41 Oct 29 2009 at 9:47 AM Rating: Good
***
1,137 posts
Tare wrote:
Well, at least one of the perpetrators (maybe all, I don't know) of the beating Reginald Denny (the white fella who got beaten by 4 black guys in the wake of the Rodney King trial) was convicted of attempted murder. That was a racially driven attack so I think it qualifies as a hate crime.



Yeah, they were rightly charged with attempted murder, but were they charged with a hate crime as well? That is the crux.
#42REDACTED, Posted: Oct 29 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#43 Oct 29 2009 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
ManifestOfKujata wrote:
Tare wrote:
Well, at least one of the perpetrators (maybe all, I don't know) of the beating Reginald Denny (the white fella who got beaten by 4 black guys in the wake of the Rodney King trial) was convicted of attempted murder. That was a racially driven attack so I think it qualifies as a hate crime.



Yeah, they were rightly charged with attempted murder, but were they charged with a hate crime as well? That is the crux.


Well, again, the problem seems to be that people won't press charges for that, not that it can't be done.

I understand your point, but it seems silly to me. The laws are there. It's not a problem with the law if the prosecutors don't take advantage of it.

Also, you might consider that these lawyers know what they're doing. Perhaps being convicted of attempted murder carries a heavier sentence than a hate crime, so that's why they chose that.
#44 Oct 29 2009 at 10:06 AM Rating: Decent
publiusvarus wrote:
Locked,

Review the Newsom rape, torture, murder trial occurring here in Knoxville TN if you want to see how little the feds care about hate crime prosecution equality. Two white college kids were kidnapped, raped, tortured, and murdered. All the perps were black and yet this still apparently didn't warrant the "hate crime" label.


Newsflash: being victimized by someone of a different skin color / sexual orientation / whatever does not automagically a hate crime make.
#45 Oct 29 2009 at 10:07 AM Rating: Good
BrownDuck wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Locked,

Review the Newsom rape, torture, murder trial occurring here in Knoxville TN if you want to see how little the feds care about hate crime prosecution equality. Two white college kids were kidnapped, raped, tortured, and murdered. All the perps were black and yet this still apparently didn't warrant the "hate crime" label.


Newsflash: being victimized by someone of a different skin color / sexual orientation / whatever does not automagically a hate crime make.


This, too.

A lot of Majestic's examples were simply crimes, but not necessarily racially motivated crimes.
#46 Oct 29 2009 at 10:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
Two white college kids were kidnapped, raped, tortured, and murdered. All the perps were black and yet this still apparently didn't warrant the "hate crime" label.

Maybe they need something more than "these folks were black and those folks were white". Or perhaps the evidence wasn't strong enough to risk complicating the other charges and risk losing the case.

Or, hey, maybe they just did a shitty job of prosecuting the case in this instance. Which wouldn't negate every other case.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#47 Oct 29 2009 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Locked,

Review the Newsom rape, torture, murder trial occurring here in Knoxville TN if you want to see how little the feds care about hate crime prosecution equality. Two white college kids were kidnapped, raped, tortured, and murdered. All the perps were black and yet this still apparently didn't warrant the "hate crime" label.



Not every crime involving perpetrators and victims of different races is a hate crime. Was there any evidence that made you think this was a hate crime, other than the races of those involved?

Either way, good to get these thugs off the street. That whole story is just horrendous.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#48 Oct 29 2009 at 10:32 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
No, the case varus is talking about isn't a hate crime. It was a carjacking gone horribly wrong and had nothing to do with the fact that the victims were white.
#49 Oct 29 2009 at 10:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The Reginald Denney case clearly WAS a hate crime, in my opinion. I wondered why it wasn't prosecuted as such. I have to assume it was due to the somewhat explosive political climate in L.A. at the time.

Still, it seems cowardly to avoid confronting all the issues.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#50REDACTED, Posted: Oct 29 2009 at 10:41 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Samy,
#51 Oct 29 2009 at 10:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Nope, sorry. It can be prosecuted as such if there's reason to believe it is - if racial epithets are used, for example, or racist symbols like burning crosses and what not.

The prosecution may or may not be successful, of course. /shrug


____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 343 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (343)