Paedophile to be beheaded and crucifiedFollow

Someone who just makes things up and who isn't capable of even knowing how to have a conversation let alone how to make a point doesn't really get to make comments about other people's intelligence.

It always amazes me how the worst aspects of the Internet can twist things round in their head and try to make out they are somehow intelligent and it's other people who are somewhat lacking, when it's they who can't even do the simplest things.

If I post in someone's thread, I respond to what they are saying and a conversation takes place. A simple process that seems totally beyond you.

The kind of angry, message board dimwit who can't bear the fact people don't agree with whatever he's saying is common enough.
Someone who just makes things up and who isn't capable of even knowing how to have a conversation let alone how to make a point doesn't really get to make comments about other people's intelligence.

It always amazes me how the worst aspects of the Internet can twist things round in their head and try to make out they are somehow intelligent and it's other people who are somewhat lacking, when it's they who can't even do the simplest things.

If I post in someone's thread, I respond to what they are saying and a conversation takes place. A simple process that seems totally beyond you.

The kind of angry, message board dimwit who can't bear the fact people don't agree with whatever he's saying is common enough. Finding 2 on one thread who don't even know how to have a conversation is pretty rare though.

I object to classifying this perp as a homosexual. Same-sex preference in pedophiles has less to do with sexual orientation and more to do having a preferred victim profile, like many rapists who might prefer tall brunettes or whatever.

However, I suspect the reason this sentence is so harsh is BECAUSE the victims were male. Were they female, even children, his sentence would be much less harsh, and quite possibly the surviving girls would have been punished as well.

Dumb-*** Saudis.

It's like you can't understand English. I'm not interested in cases where 'evidence is anecdotal'. Nor am I interested in talking about the application of the death penalty as a whole. There are plenty of times when guilt is easily established. In this thread, I made a point about a specific instance. If you have something to say, reply to that, not change the subject to something else you want to talk about.



I specifically didn't say that he was. They haven't given enough details of the court case. I said that IF it was the case, I would have no problem with the death penalty being applied. A very simple observation that half the people on this thread have replied to in one post while the other half have failed hopelessly to.



What a sick, nasty little prick you are. Calling people 'monsters' for pointing out that if a baby rapist/murderer is guilty of his crimes then the death penalty could be applied. Your behaviour in twisting words, refusing to even read what you are replying to and seemingly replying to voices in your head instead of what is written marks you out as a very weird, unpleasant human being. And your defence of a baby rapist/murderer when you have no reason to think he's innocent is worthy of a 'monster' tag. I'm beginning to see why the Asylum has its reputation for retards.



Yeah, I recommend you seek medical help. When you're cured, instead of choosing to be bigoted and ignorant, either speak to people from a region to get your knowledge of what it's like or go and travel to a place yourself and learn first hand what it's like. When you're done, you'll actually know things instead of having to make them up.



Why would you string up trees? What have they done?

I pointed out that one specific baby rapist/murderer, if found conclusively guilty, should be sentenced to death for his crimes and in response you rant hysterically about mass killings and stringing up everyone regardless of crime or circumstance.

You have the mentality of a PETA member, a religious zealot or, I suppose, a typical message board poster...

Paskil can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's not what he was doing. He was speaking about the actions of Saudi Arabia towards homosexuals in general.

Cite.



Hahaha.



See, herein lies the problem.



Hahaha.

This poster does not fail to deliver.

He's even invoking the *gasp* Karma!

Don't bother.

Seriously, do us all a favour, and give up. It's pointless, really. We all think you're grade A moron who answers posts a decade late, what's the point in persevering? We all got your point ages ago, we all think it's retarded, and really the best course of action is for you to PM Varrus so you two can exchange email addresses and send each other videos of yourself ************ to snuff movies.

Also, you lied! You rated me down! Oh wait, I probably shouldn't expect you to know up from down, apologies.

Edited, Nov 4th 2009 4:17pm by RedPhoenixxx

That's how most of our threads end.

You might actually be the most self-deluded person I've met. Simply because I am such a wonderful person, I'll actually be the one to bite the fucking bullet and answer your stupidly childish question.

Let me play with you then, and address your actual "point." Let us assume for just a moment, you sniveling coward, that we can actually ascertain, with 100% certainty, that someone raped a child, and left it to die. Let us further let our minds wander about, you insipid poison, wallowing in the most deplorable and execrable locations we can imagine, from the frigid Niflheim to the realms of the Inferno, from the pits of the Abyss to the apathetic Gehenna, and let us infuse all of the evils of them, (perhaps the evils of yourself) into whatever criminal we'd like: the rape of a two year old and subsequent consuming its flesh; the skinning-alive of grandmothers; the bombing of day-cares as political terrorism. Let us then ask ourselves, you self-deludor, if any of these crimes are worthy of letting vengeance and bloodlust into our hearts sufficient to murder someone ourselves, in the name of just retribution, or even for the sake of just "containing" a person for life, but that nuking the criminal from orbit is the only way to be sure. Let us ask, given all of these things as true, if the state should be allowed to murder a person.

No, not even in the face of Armageddon.

Edited, Nov 4th 2009 11:49am by Pensive

The expansive cost of the death penalty isn't due to rent on a prison cell, it's due to the legal costs to the state involved in all the appeals.

haha irony

God you're a pathetic human.

That's no way to feed the outrage **** market, Missy.