Elinda wrote:
jtftaru wrote:
It's my fault for expecting you to act like decent human beings. I take total responsibility for this thread. Sorry everyone.
You're advocating for beheadings and crucification, yet accusing others of indecent humaness because they don't talk nice to you on a forum?
Get a perspective
I have a perfect perspective. That's why I believe that people who commit the most heinous of crimes deserve a fitting punishment. Raping and murdering children fits that bill.
What has that got to do with ********* on a board attacking people for no reason? You could see why the concept of a fitting punishment for anti social ********* would frighten a few of them.
LockeColeMA wrote:
Looks like you forget your original post. You want "street scum" to get the same treatment. You say nothing about rapists. In your next post (or a few down?) you mention chavs, and according to the definition, they are street scum. I just call 'em how I see 'em.
Again, if you can't detect sarcasm not really my fault. Although certain street scum who do things like kick people to death or into a coma for laughs and who video it with their mobile phone and upload it for kicks to show off do fit the bill.
Allegory wrote:
As much fun as it is for you to point out how wrong jtftaru is, and I'm sure you know this, it is pointless.
You can't change affective attitudes with reason. It's very clear that jtftaru made an emotional choice about what he thinks should be don't to child rapist and then invented reasons after the fact to justify that choice. The reasons he gives are completely irrelevant. Proving someone's justifications wrong only lead to new justifications.
Calling people 'wrong' because they don't agree with your ignorant opinion doesn't reflect well on you.
If you'd bothered to read between the posts of crap on here you'd have seen that in the end, most of the people you are talking to actually agreed with me. So your comments apply to them too. They are just keyboard warrior ********* who have to disagree and fight for the sake of it first.
You cannot also call irrelevant rambling 'reason' which is why most of the first 50 posts in this thread are mostly total nonsense as they don't even respond to the point I made.
If you personally don't believe that a sick, heinous crime such as raping and murdering babies is deserving of an equal punishment, that is your opinion.
It doesn't make you right but you are entitled to your opinion. Unlike intolerant people like you, it doesn't bother me if people don't have the same opinion as me, as you would have noticed if you'd read the whole thread and seen me respect those who actually answered my point but disagreed with me.
And my choice was certainly not based on emotion. It's based on logic and a sense of fairness. Emotion would only come into it if someone close to me was killed like that.