Paedophile to be beheaded and crucifiedFollow

Of course it doesn't you fucking stupid coward. That is the entire point - which you seem to be in denial about - that I am not condemning you, as a person, a person who exists as a subject that is, for having feelings of murderous intention, but rather for your total unwillingness to make those feelings real to you. You are a coward, a sniveling, little, obsequious, weasel of a coward. who is so self-emasculatory that he refuses to even consider the potential consequences of his beliefs in the society of which he is a microcosm.

The ethical condemnation remains the same. Murder is always wrong, and your murder of an inmate on death row is just as wrong as the inmates was, but if you are going to murder someone, you could have the respect for the person you are murdering, as well as the respect for yourself to own your actions and ideas as your own, to do it yourself, instead of pretending like you can bury your head in the sand and hide from your impotence.

You are a craven and fearful, milquetoast, sir. You disrespect yourself, the condemned, and all of society, on top of being ethically abhorrent.



Yup, everyone but belkira and samira and anna iirc

But aside from them even, I like most of my "comrades" because most of them are quite intelligent and rational. You are not. You don't seem to understand -any- of the positions being offered to you, and you don't seem to understand that, on a forum, as the OP, you don't get to dictate the bounds of the argument. People may introduce new ideas, at which point we must come to a decision on your original point.

I have, and I think most people have. I understand it; it's idiotic.

At that point, when a discussion morphs into a new topic, you can roll with it, or you can scream futility into the night for control over the discourse, acting in denial, fooling yourself into believing that they just don't get it, that they should have been more polite, that you weren't being inciteful (in a place where that is valued,) and dragging out every possibly ounce of dignity from your soul until you remain on the ground, a shallow husk of a man. You've chosen the latter. It's disgusting.

Edited, Nov 4th 2009 6:04pm by Pensive

I don't judge people by how they respond to me. I judge people by how they behave in general.

I hate to break this to you but in case you hadn't noticed, the Asylum has a reputation of being full of low life keyboard warrior scumbag filth. If Alla is the *** of the Internet, then the Asylum is the **** and the people who post here as regulars the impacted faecal matter that can't be pushed out. And the OOT has only a very slightly better reputation.

You got that reputation without my help.

As for me, I don't attack people who disagree with me or who have differing opinions, when I post in someone's thread I reply to what they say not what I want them to say and I often talk about people being more pleasant on here instead of spending all their time attacking each other.

So really, don't try and make me out to be like you just because I point out how you behave.

So, in this post you have called me (and others who post here) "scumbag filth," and compared me (and others who post here) to compounded fecal matter. You then made assumptions on how I behave.

Care to show me where I insulted you at all before you levered those attacks on me?

Edited, Nov 4th 2009 5:02pm by Belkira

The only thing that has been agreed to is that you have a point if we lived in a fantasy world. You seem to think this means you would be right trying to apply this point to reality.

Oyez como va, muchacho.

You don't get to complain about others sniping at you when you have been making snarky, ****** comments all along.

So glad we had this chat. Really, lt was magic. Let's do it again soon.

There is no fantasy land argument. I pointed out that child rapists or murderers are deserving of capital punishment and most people agreed. If you and your kind are incapable of having a decent conversation without acting like textbook message board losers that doesn't affect me.

Not attacking people pointlessly isn't any definition of cowardice. It's a good indication of why you have your reputation though.

Well you're reading them enough to form an opinion about them, and responding to them. Seems like you are, in fact, reading them.

Come on man, all I'm doing is pointing out why your reasoning is inherently flawed in two major categories of value. If anything, you should be thanking me for showing you how sniveling and creepy you are. Look man, this is only the beginning. Go out and murder someone today, so you can finally fulfil your repressed drives and frustrations against evil-doers in the world who you can't stand being alive, and then reap the just consequences, and be exiled from society because you aren't capable of asserting your own values.

You need to be yourself man.

You misunderstand. I didn't mean you personally I meant you collectively. I did use the word collectively in a previous post.

You must be aware of the reputation the Asylum and its posters have? And the OOT to a certain extent? I can't believe you are unaware of it.

If you truly are, you can always click on the many links in this forum to see all the threads, (most of which don't involve me) where all people do is attack and insult each other.

Jophiel made reference to it earlier.

I understand the reputation, as well as the use of a collective "you."

Surely you understand, however, that using the collective "you" includes me, considering I post in the OOT and, to a lesser extent, the Asylum. Therefore, you were attacking me, when it was not warranted.

That's the problem with generalizations.

My point, though, is that you've really just demostrated that you are just as bad as those that you are judging.

And what possible difference does it make if we have a "reputation" beyond this forum? Who gives a ripe one, exactly?

Samira is the man I aspire to be