The Conservative Case for Gay MarriageFollow

Realistically, if he was really about the dollars and the pennies and little babies, he'd be pushing to allow homosexuals to marry and create stable homes where they can then adopt children and remove them from being wards of the state, wehre they are costing tax payers far more money than the benefits accorded to homosexuals that marry and where they can grow up in a home that will turn them in productive members of society. But it really isn't about the money, or the kids. It's about backing the Republicans party line.

But Gbaji's BS isn't the Republican party line. The Pubes (and hell, even Virus himself) are at least honest enough to give homophobic rationale for their homophobic agenda. Gbaji is literally the only person I've seen ANYWHERE who espouses that particular rationale for why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

My personal theory--and I could be way off base here--is that Gbaji is actually telling the truth when he says he's not anti-gay. I think somewhere in the deep, dark recesses of his own mind that he himself doesn't dare investigate too closely, he's appalled by the blatant homophobia and anti-gay rhetoric the GOP employs on this issue. Then he comes up against a cognitive dissonance because he still wants to support the GOP, but can't support their homophobic platform. To resolve the dissonance, he has concocted a rationale against gay marriage that still supports the Republican agenda without being homophobic, and tries to pass it off as being the actual Republican rationale.

Edited, Jan 20th 2010 10:29am by Ambrya

Umm...yeah. Pretty much what I said.

Yeah. That.

Even Varus's reasons, asinine as they may be, sound more sincere than Gbaji's logic-maze of conjecture and false assumptions.

Closets are dirty and that's where they belong?

It's Virus's take on spontaneous generation.

That wasn't an answer.

I'll probably forget about this thread for a few hundred posts, so I'll just jump to my point. If you want to claim that **** sex is unhealthy, first you have to remember that heterosexual couples do it too. Second, lesbian couples can't biologically do it at all. Third, condoms.

And finally, it's not even an automatic outcome of a male-male homosexual relationship. Homosexuality is not unhealthy, unprotected sex with multiple strangers is. You're insulting a LOT of people trying to equate the two.

This is fucking hilarious coming from you, who try to convince us all about how much booty you get on a regular basis, you fucking hypocrite.

I can't believe you then have the audacity to bring Christianity into it, as if you were some pious innocent instead of one of the sinful that you hate so very, very much.

You sicken me sometimes, Varus.

Just like how heterosexuality and unprotected sex aren't mutually exclusive either, you stupid fuckwit.

Now, you KNOW natural disasters only strike sinful areas. Houston, Miami, the Great Plains.