Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Try as I might, I cannot listen to this manFollow

#1 Jan 16 2010 at 7:30 AM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
Gordon Brown mumbling on

The captain of the sick ship Labour prattles on. I just could not listen. Its like trying to listen to one of those horribly boring lecturers that send you into a coma. No panache .. not a hint of leadership.

What do you think of Brown
I'm just waiting for the election to get him out (I'm not anti Labour):1 (5.0%)
I'm just waiting for the election to get Labour out:2 (10.0%)
I voted for Labour and Blair, who is this Joker?:0 (0.0%)
I'm a Tory, I love him being the head of Labour:0 (0.0%)
I'm a Tory, I do not like him:0 (0.0%)
I'm a Tory, I'm indifferent:0 (0.0%)
He is the best thing to happen to England:0 (0.0%)
He is doing a good job in a bad situation:3 (15.0%)
I think he is the right man with the right team to govern England:2 (10.0%)
I stopped listening to anything he had to say years ago:3 (15.0%)
Gwen, yet again you left out an option (feel free to expand):9 (45.0%)
Total:20




Edited, Jan 16th 2010 1:52pm by GwynapNud
#2 Jan 16 2010 at 7:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Are there even enough Brits here to be able to vote once for each option?


____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#3 Jan 16 2010 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
You are right, changed to include anyone who has an opinion of this man.
#4 Jan 16 2010 at 7:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Jesus Christ, I can't stand the phrase "mainstream majority" and, quite frankly, I'm enraged that it's still in use.

Anyway, sure, Brown still has no charisma, but are we really going to pretend Cameron does either? He is astoundingly dull, his only remarkable features being a certain bloat smugness that resists even the most thorough of air-brushings and the air of a child that thinks it's being especially cunning. It's transparent as hell - I'd describe it as hilariously so if not for the fact that he is genuinely fooling people.

As for Brown doing all these things:

"destroyed their pensions"

No, that was Thatcher indexing the state pension to inflation alone as opposed to inflation and the median income as was previously the case. Not sure what this one is even on about, unless it's an allusion to the global financial crises that Brown totally caused.

"increased their taxes"

He hasn't even done that yet.

"crippled social mobility"

Access to education has increased under labour. Funny thing, that Gordon Brown is supposed to have treated the upper classes, the middle classes and the lower classes unfairly.
#5 Jan 16 2010 at 8:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,086 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Jesus Christ, I can't stand the phrase "mainstream majority" and, quite frankly, I'm enraged that it's still in use.

Anyway, sure, Brown still has no charisma, but are we really going to pretend Cameron does either? He is astoundingly dull, his only remarkable features being a certain bloat smugness that resists even the most thorough of air-brushings and the air of a child that thinks it's being especially cunning. It's transparent as hell - I'd describe it as hilariously so if not for the fact that he is genuinely fooling people.


I'm not saying I'm impressed with Cameron. In fact none of the parties are impressing me right now. I'm been distinctly unimpressed with Clegg Smiley: bah The fact remains that just because the opposition are low grade does not excuse Browns less than passable performance.

Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:

As for Brown doing all these things:

"destroyed their pensions"

No, that was Thatcher indexing the state pension to inflation alone as opposed to inflation and the median income as was previously the case. Not sure what this one is even on about, unless it's an allusion to the global financial crises that Brown totally caused.


Actually, my family have been hit directly by Browns meddling in pensions. With my parents coming to retirement age soon, they have seen the taxes on pensions reduce their expected income dramatically.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/pensions/article1593939.ece

Labour have seen 12 years in power during an era of high tax revenues and ability to spend. So why are you blaming Thatcher for the poor state pension when you should be looking at Brown - the Chancellor for most of the Labour tenancy? And with Darling cutting pensions in his pre-budget report I'm surprised you even mention this.

Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:

"increased their taxes"

He hasn't even done that yet.


He did it while he was Chanceller with tax creep. I'm not even going to go looking for cites here Smiley: rolleyes


Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:

"crippled social mobility"

Access to education has increased under labour. Funny thing, that Gordon Brown is supposed to have treated the upper classes, the middle classes and the lower classes unfairly.


What type of education? When I went to University I received a grant which on my first year paid for my entire accomodation and my books. By my final year, it barely paid for my books (it was being reduced). I left in debt to the student loans company.
I would hate to think how much more debt I would be in completing the same course now.

With many employers insisting on 2.1 degrees for positions, if you cannot afford to go to University, you cannot afford to progress in your career.

Now while this is not all Labours fault, as the Tories started the decline in the grant, Labour have not addressed the issue of those from families with low incomes being unable to attend university.

Some blurb here



Edited, Jan 16th 2010 2:29pm by GwynapNud
#6 Jan 16 2010 at 8:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Move to a better country. Like Canada, or even the US.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#7 Jan 16 2010 at 8:51 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
The fact remains that just because the opposition are low grade does not excuse Browns less than passable performance.


Well, it sort of does. It's all relative, really. You have to vote for one of the fuckers.

Quote:
Labour have seen 12 years in power during an era of high tax revenues and ability to spend. So why are you blaming Thatcher for the poor state pension when you should be looking at Brown - the Chancellor for most of the Labour tenancy? And with Darling cutting pensions in his pre-budget report I'm surprised you even mention this.


Well, because she did it, mainly. I blame Blair for not un-doing it, if that helps, but by far the largest legislative blow to the pension system came from the Tory side.

I don't really blame Brown for major policy decisions while he was chancellor because of how centralised the party became under Blair. Frankly, I doubt he had all that much say.

Quote:
Some blurb here


Not comparative.

Statistically, more people go to university now, and the make up of univerities is more socially diverse.

Quote:
Move to a better country. Like Canada, or even the US.


Smiley: laugh

Edited, Jan 16th 2010 3:04pm by Kavekk
#8 Jan 16 2010 at 9:28 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
Move to a better country. Like Canada, or even the US.


Smiley: laugh


The U.S. is a good country if you are really good at what you do.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#9 Jan 16 2010 at 9:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
Move to a better country. Like Canada, or even the US.


Smiley: laugh


The U.S. is a good country if you are really good at what you do.
And Canada has great ice cubes!
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#10 Jan 16 2010 at 9:55 AM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Well, because she did it, mainly. I blame Blair for not un-doing it, if that helps, but by far the largest legislative blow to the pension system came from the Tory side.

I don't really blame Brown for major policy decisions while he was chancellor because of how centralised the party became under Blair. Frankly, I doubt he had all that much say.


Disagree.

The link to earnings was only established for 6 years, being put in place in 1974.
The Tories revoked the link for 17 years but removed it at a time of financial crisis for the United Kingdom when Margaret Thatcher was forced to make stringent cuts.
For 13 years Labour have not restored it while revenue was in surplus.

Labour have had almost as many years as the Tories to put plug the pension gap but they did not. Added to that, those who decided to save in private pensions have been dealt a blow by Brown seeing their carefully planned retirement pots shrink under his taxation. If you saved privately or decided to be prudent and provide a little extra in SERPS then you can thank Labour directly for reducing your pot of gold in retirement. My parents certainly do hold him to account.

So really, the worst party for pensions is Labour. They did not restore the state pension link to earnings and have at the same time introduced tax on private pensions and even punished those with SERPS.

The kind of political animal that engineers the removal of a partys leader does not pass idly by and obey orders. So I refute your claim that Brown had little say in the matter of pensions.

And about those going University. What is the social mix of those going to University? Which income levels do they come from? Are there excluded groups? Maybe you should go look into that sometime.


Edited, Jan 16th 2010 4:13pm by GwynapNud
#11 Jan 16 2010 at 11:21 AM Rating: Good
GwynapNud of the Emerald Dream wrote:
So really, the worst party for pensions is Labour.


A statement like this is meaningless. Novody can "plug" the pension gap anymore, and no one will ever restore the link to earnings. I know Cameron he said he "aspired to do it", but he won't. The freeze that Darling announced is temporary, and pretty much inevitable. There is no "worse party" for pensions, it's a poor system that was abominably managed for decades. Not only that, but when Labour had a surplus it would've made no sense to invest it in "plugging the pension gap". People wanted better schools, better hospitals, social programmes for poor kids, stuff that not only benefited society but also stimulated the economy. It might've sucked for your parents, but it was the right thing to do.

And anyway, all this discussion is irrelevant because Brown is irrelevant. He's got 5 months left and then we won't see much of him again. So really, if you hear him speak, just switch the bloody channel.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#12 Jan 16 2010 at 1:28 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
***
2,228 posts
Alton Brown is the only Brown worth trusting.
____________________________
[ffxisig]188740[/ffxisig]
Busa's Cloth Guide 1-100
Zaredx wrote:
Gjallihorn + Carnwenhan = Green Ranger's Flute! DRAGONZORD!
#13 Jan 16 2010 at 1:29 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
Busaman the Mighty wrote:
Alton Brown is the only Brown worth trusting.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#14 Jan 16 2010 at 1:30 PM Rating: Good
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
You forgot the option: "I'm a Yankee, who the @#&! are these people? (and why do I care?)"
#15 Jan 16 2010 at 2:29 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
L) Need moar options
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 379 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (379)