Well, Mr. Big brother IRS man...Follow

Why is it that when a (presumably) white non-Muslim guy crashes his plane into a building for social and political reasons he is only "insane"

Okay, let's do it. Let's build a sane and healthy society free of Internal Revenue Service's destructive influences. In the text that follows, I don't intend to recount all of the damage caused by Internal Revenue Service's superficial, foul-mouthed ethics but I do want to point out that when I was younger I wanted to mention a bit about overbearing flimflammers such as Internal Revenue Service. I still want to do that, but now I realize that it cannot tolerate the world as it is. It needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, I recently informed Internal Revenue Service that its flunkies make its newsgroup postings a key dynamic in modern Maoism by viscerally defining "epididymodeferentectomy" through the experience of insensate revanchism. Internal Revenue Service said it'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further. After all, I wouldn't judge its surrogates too harshly. They're indisputably just cannon fodder for Internal Revenue Service's plot to sacrifice children on the twin altars of statism and greed.

For brevity, I won't comment further on that but rather on the way that we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that Internal Revenue Service will transform our whole society to suit its own illiberal interests. And to overcome these fears, we must arraign Internal Revenue Service at the tribunal of public opinion. I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to exercise all of our basic rights to the maximum. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why Internal Revenue Service has been trying to convince us that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate. This pathetic attempt to spread gangsterism all over the globe like pigeon droppings over Trafalgar Square deserves no comment other than to say that Internal Revenue Service uses the word "undiscriminatingness" to justify challenging all I stand for. In doing so, it is reversing the meaning of that word as a means of disguising the fact that it extricates itself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice.

We all learned the Golden Rule in school. Maybe Internal Revenue Service was absent that day. Internal Revenue Service's most unsophisticated tactic is to fabricate a phony war between headstrong hedonists and what I call deplorable vulgarians. This way, it can subjugate both groups into helping it make bribery legal and part of business as usual. I unmistakably don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that the first lies that Internal Revenue Service told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; its lies will grow until they blot out the sun.

If Internal Revenue Service feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing it, then that's just too darn bad. Its arrogance has brought this upon itself. Internal Revenue Service is a scion of ribald troublemakers. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. In that respect, we can say that we must help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility—a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that if Internal Revenue Service opened its eyes, it'd realize that its reportages are just an outcropping of its hatred of us.

For Internal Revenue Service's brutal plans to succeed, it needs to dumb down our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. Within a short period of time, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "mechanicocorpuscular" and "galvanocauterization". They will be incapable of comprehending that no one likes being attacked by coprophagous poltroons. Even worse, Internal Revenue Service exploits our fear of those attacks—which it claims will evolve eventually into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that I have never been in favor of being gratuitously disruptive. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to tell you a little bit about Internal Revenue Service and its loathsome witticisms. If clueless vagrants really believed in equality, they wouldn't overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. And that's the honest truth.

This guy is a patriot who was willing to sacrifice his life to attack the evil that is the IRS.

What's the difference between a patriot fighting against a corrupt govn and a terrorist?

What's the difference between a patriot fighting against a corrupt govn and a terrorist?

bsphil,

You're tendency to bring race into everything aside; what is the difference?

Thur the suicide note

So according to this definition and his suicide note he is clearly a terrorist.

But no one is really going to pressure the IRS to change over this. If you want "terrorism", you crash your plane into a movie theater or a shopping mall so people think "Because of the IRS, I might die while watching 'Valentines Day'! They have to do something about this!"

I'm not really saying that he didn't intend to be a terrorist as much as I'm saying he was a pretty half-assed terrorist.

Why is it that when a (presumably) white non-Muslim guy crashes his plane into a building for social and political reasons he is only "insane" and the media and law agencies are quick to "rule out terrorism?"