Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Suicide attempt worthy of The Internet (was forum=28)Follow

#127 Mar 14 2010 at 6:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
See, Tailmon is an idiot, but Pigtails is a much better target.

Nothing is as much fun in teh Assylum as a fUcking wannabe with the intellect of a coffee mug, the insight of a hamster, the morals of a ***** and a sense of self-worth that's out of proportion.

And did I mention Kaolian is a seriously nice man?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#128 Mar 14 2010 at 6:14 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
No, the guy pretending to a girl incident is not about Tailmon.

Tailmon gets a lot of flack purely on her own posting merits. There is the occasional poster who genuinely doesn't get why she's a she when she's got a ***** attached to her, and who tend to call her "he".
#129 Mar 14 2010 at 6:35 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I take ONE night off to watch SVU reruns and Purple Rain and miss all the fun.


/sulk.
#130 Mar 14 2010 at 7:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
No, the guy pretending to a girl incident is not about Tailmon.

Tailmon gets a lot of flack purely on her own posting merits. There is the occasional poster who genuinely doesn't get why she's a she when she's got a ***** attached to her, and who tend to call her "he".


Remember that I said Lady J was probably not a hot sex therapist?

Well, she was no lady either. Allegedly.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#131 Mar 14 2010 at 7:33 AM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,972 posts
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
I'm assuming he's referring to Tailmon there.


Smiley: facepalm

Dur.



I guess I was thinking about after we heard about Kyrin dying, someone posted claiming that she was really a he posing as a she - both here and in RL. I don't know if that was proven one way or the other.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#132 Mar 14 2010 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
Lord Nobby wrote:
See, Tailmon is an idiot, but Pigtails is a much better target.

Nothing is as much fun in teh Assylum as a fUcking wannabe with the intellect of a coffee mug, the insight of a hamster, the morals of a ***** and a sense of self-worth that's out of proportion.

And did I mention Kaolian is a seriously nice man?
Actually, I thought gbaji was the most fun you could have in the Asylum.

It should be added that, while I do have strong views on some threads in the Asylum, I rarely post here simply because it's too much fun to post something irrelevant or contrary to a popular view and watch everyone go ******* about it.
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#133 Mar 14 2010 at 1:01 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
God, you people really need to learn the difference between healthy, fun-for-all trolling and straight-up senseless asshattery. At this rate, you'll all be banninated and then what? Kavekk?


Also: Pigtails is the new Niobia.
#134 Mar 14 2010 at 1:49 PM Rating: Good
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Quote:
I'm of the opinion that trans people are more than just a guy pretending to be a girl or vice versa, but of course not everyone agrees there.
I'm off the opnion that most posters here are of the same opinion and just pick at Tailmon because she's an easy target. But then again, I catch the obvious.


Well yeah, and I'm sure that has a lot to do with the way she's treated. As I've only seen Hallertau's interactions with the one transperson, and he consistently refers to her as a he, it's hard to tell whether he's doing that because Tailmon is trans or because Tailmon is Tailmon, or both. That's the reason I mentioned it.


He does that to get under her skin. Just like she attacks his baby and calls him a bad dad because it gets under his skin.
#135 Mar 14 2010 at 2:15 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
I must have missed something.
#136 Mar 14 2010 at 2:23 PM Rating: Decent
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
God, you people really need to learn the difference between healthy, fun-for-all trolling and straight-up senseless asshattery. At this rate, you'll all be banninated and then what? Kavekk?


Also: Pigtails is the new Niobia.
Not all of us, just BT and Ginny. They used to be healthy, well-balanced trolls, but I guess living below the OoT and Asylum bridges has caused them to absorb some unseemly toxins and mutate into what they are today.

I was especially confused when my gag thread of the @#%^ING FURY got dragged in... especially since BT actually posted in it and seemed to get the joke. Meh, whatev's.

And as for her being the new Niobia... I'm afraid that saga is beyond my time around here, so I cannot comment.

Sweetums wrote:
I must have missed something.
Basically Pigtails replied to a post, and BT latched onto her *** like a rabid pitbull again. Then there was personal information posted, then the Kaolian of yore was woken from his cave of righteous vengeance, came down upon this thread and laid down the law as only he can. And apparently because I pointed out that BT's a touch obsessed of late, I'm now a white knight.. I guess? Maybe he meant to say a White Castle knight... that would better match my current cholesterol levels... Anyway... What was I talking about?

Edited, Mar 14th 2010 3:30pm by Pawkeshup
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#137 Mar 14 2010 at 3:05 PM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Just for the record, since Pawkeshup is doing such a fabulous job at being the wonderful douchebag that he is, that BT didn't say a thing to her until this:

PigtailsOfDoom of Future Fabulous! wrote:
I don't know you, but my dad died after a year and a half of battling a brain tumor, so I have an idea of how rough that battle can be. It's not an easy journey, and I certainly wouldn't wish it on anyone. Not even BT, and I really don't like him.


So let's not assume he attached to her like a rabid dog unprovoked. She's been posting nearly incessantly about how mean he is, baw baw baw, etc. I mean, come on, I know she's a slow learner, but people should know better than to just ask for it.

And Kaolian, since we are conversing about this in the open, in the future, I'd please like you to respect that I am a separate person than Barkingturtle, and I've been threatened with bans and mutes as often as anyone. None of these "warnings" have been in PMs. I'd challenge you to come up with one example of when I have crossed any line as far as the actual written rules on this site state. I have the misfortune of being drawn to trolling attention whores with low self esteem, because they f*cking drive me nuts. If you ever get tired of hearing complaints on my behalf because of this, don't throw out threats of mutes of bans, just do it, and out of courtesy, maybe send me a PM or something with an explanation. But I'm sure this is all probably too much to ask.

Good lord, you guys blame my for Barkingturtle-lite, but you should realize he's afraid to post half of the things that he wants to because of sh*t like this. You hurt the wrong person's feelings and Pawkeshup comes riding in on his white unicorn sh*tting rainbows all over the place and we're chastised to "play" at the level of Care Bears and My Little Ponies. If only people had thicker skins... but for most, the internet will always be srs business.
#138 Mar 14 2010 at 3:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Guenny wrote:
Pawkeshup comes riding in on his white unicorn sh*tting rainbows all over the place and we're chastised to "play" at the level of Care Bears and My Little Ponies.

Oh Guenny, Robot Unicorn Attack was so last week.
#139 Mar 14 2010 at 3:49 PM Rating: Good
Guenny wrote:
Just for the record, since Pawkeshup is doing such a fabulous job at being the wonderful douchebag that he is, that BT didn't say a thing to her until this:

PigtailsOfDoom of Future Fabulous! wrote:
I don't know you, but my dad died after a year and a half of battling a brain tumor, so I have an idea of how rough that battle can be. It's not an easy journey, and I certainly wouldn't wish it on anyone. Not even BT, and I really don't like him.


So let's not assume he attached to her like a rabid dog unprovoked. She's been posting nearly incessantly about how mean he is, baw baw baw, etc. I mean, come on, I know she's a slow learner, but people should know better than to just ask for it.


You're right, posting that was asking for more attacks from him, which I promptly ignored until he and then you started posting personal information of mine, without my permission. I'm rather flattered you two find me so interesting that you feel the need to look up my name and my profiles on social networking sites.

Also, other than the post you quoted above, I've only mentioned that I dislike him one or two other times since the other thread that got moved here. That's hardly incessant.
#140 Mar 14 2010 at 3:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Guenny wrote:
Just I'd challenge you to come up with one example of when I have crossed any line as far as the actual written rules on this site state.



http://www.zam.com/ForumRules.html

Just under a quick search of your posts, I see instances of:

Posting NWS threads without tags in OOT, filter breaking repeatedly in OOT despite prior warnings, Posting sexually explicit content, Paragraph IX violations under the posting personal information clause, Harrasment under Paragraph I, mainly directed at Katielynn back in the day and she was recipricol, which is why that never got acted on more.

Most of which resulted in verbal warnings in thread rather than PM. or edits by me or other admin staff. Or were under extenuating circumstances such as the other person was replying in kind so they got ignored.

But yes, there are more than a few.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#141 Mar 14 2010 at 4:03 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
#142 Mar 14 2010 at 4:38 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Bardalicious wrote:
No way, dude.

This.
#143 Mar 14 2010 at 5:02 PM Rating: Good
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
Love you too Ginny. Glad you are as deluded as BT has become. I hardly see my telling BT, for the second time, that he's becoming more and more irrelevant the longer he tries attacking someone who isn't widely despised by the forum.

As entertaining as he used to be, even I draw the line posting personal info that hasn't been shared on the boards. Stalking someone to the point of actually finding their accounts on other sites just to harass them is beyond going too far, and I have no qualms saying that I reported it at that point. And hell, I'd have done the same even if it were... and I just threw up in my mouth a lil thinking of it... Tail or Katie.

It's one thing bludgeoning people with their old posts here. They freely gave us that, and I've done my fair share of it *cough*Senj*coughcough* And to me, even good-natured (or not so good natured) harassment is a part of the culture here. Hell, I've been hated on, I've been accepted, I've been.. well in just about every situation.

But there comes a time to stop having that knee-jerk reaction. I mean, it's not shocking for someone to say they dislike BT. And if that somehow hurt his feelings (Does BT even HAVE feelings? Discuss.), or makes him drool and chomp at the bit to attack Pigtails, perhaps it's time to go outside for a walk instead of hopping to Google and trying to dig up additional "ammo" for the attack?

Don't get me wrong, I was always a fan of a good BT troll. Hell, I even encouraged him to attack me a few times, and the creativity he had was astounding. If we actually talked some, instead of trading quips or what not, the odds would be good there would be some form of friendship there. But, seriously, ever since the major blowout in the OoT, and the rules post and what not, BT's not been the same. I dunno if he's gunning for being banned. I dunno if he's just targeting people randomly. I honestly don't see why he started on Pigtails at all. She's far from the usual chew toy he normally drags around the forums. Maybe it's a lack of good targets, with the Katie's and the Senjow's and the Magi's all getting banned or scared off. I don't know. But I get this feeling that I'm not alone in feeling that BT's becoming less welcome with each new frothing at the mouth post he makes.

You might try to push off what I'm saying as me "white knighting". Obviously, you're on crack. While most of my ire is saved for =10 ********** I'm about as far from a white knight as one can get! But seriously, having BT banned would suck. I do like the guy, despite what either you or he may think. I figure that eventually, like most posters here who have their stretch of garbage posts, that he will once again post something classic and funny.

____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#144 Mar 14 2010 at 5:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Remember that I said Lady J was probably not a hot sex therapist?

Well, she was no lady either. Allegedly.

How about HUGEFEMALE?

Edit: Haha... teach me not to read Page 2 of the thread.

Edited, Mar 14th 2010 5:58pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#145 Mar 14 2010 at 5:24 PM Rating: Decent
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Bardalicious wrote:
No way, dude.

This.
I don't know if that's the cutest animal ever, but it did make me go "D'awwwwwww what a sweetie". Maybe it's my preference to kittens.
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#146 Mar 14 2010 at 5:42 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,760 posts
Pawkeshup Delivers on Time wrote:
Love you too Ginny. Glad you are as deluded as BT has become. I hardly see my telling BT, for the second time, that he's becoming more and more irrelevant the longer he tries attacking someone who isn't widely despised by the forum.

As entertaining as he used to be, even I draw the line posting personal info that hasn't been shared on the boards. Stalking someone to the point of actually finding their accounts on other sites just to harass them is beyond going too far, and I have no qualms saying that I reported it at that point. And hell, I'd have done the same even if it were... and I just threw up in my mouth a lil thinking of it... Tail or Katie.

It's one thing bludgeoning people with their old posts here. They freely gave us that, and I've done my fair share of it *cough*Senj*coughcough* And to me, even good-natured (or not so good natured) harassment is a part of the culture here. Hell, I've been hated on, I've been accepted, I've been.. well in just about every situation.

But there comes a time to stop having that knee-jerk reaction. I mean, it's not shocking for someone to say they dislike BT. And if that somehow hurt his feelings (Does BT even HAVE feelings? Discuss.), or makes him drool and chomp at the bit to attack Pigtails, perhaps it's time to go outside for a walk instead of hopping to Google and trying to dig up additional "ammo" for the attack?

Don't get me wrong, I was always a fan of a good BT troll. Hell, I even encouraged him to attack me a few times, and the creativity he had was astounding. If we actually talked some, instead of trading quips or what not, the odds would be good there would be some form of friendship there. But, seriously, ever since the major blowout in the OoT, and the rules post and what not, BT's not been the same. I dunno if he's gunning for being banned. I dunno if he's just targeting people randomly. I honestly don't see why he started on Pigtails at all. She's far from the usual chew toy he normally drags around the forums. Maybe it's a lack of good targets, with the Katie's and the Senjow's and the Magi's all getting banned or scared off. I don't know. But I get this feeling that I'm not alone in feeling that BT's becoming less welcome with each new frothing at the mouth post he makes.

You might try to push off what I'm saying as me "white knighting". Obviously, you're on crack. While most of my ire is saved for =10 @#%^tards, I'm about as far from a white knight as one can get! But seriously, having BT banned would suck. I do like the guy, despite what either you or he may think. I figure that eventually, like most posters here who have their stretch of garbage posts, that he will once again post something classic and funny.



If you were shooting for banal and insipid here, congradulations.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#147 Mar 14 2010 at 5:53 PM Rating: Decent
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
Kakar wrote:
If you were shooting for banal and insipid here, congradulations.
Unless this is another brit/EU spelling, how can you miss Congratulations, yet know the meaning of those words?

But it doesn't really matter. Pretty much posting for posting's sake I suppose. And I never claimed to be a mover and shaker, or original idea maker.
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#148 Mar 14 2010 at 6:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Doug, get the fuck off of Pawke's account.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#149 Mar 14 2010 at 7:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
This thread had potential. Oh well.
#150 Mar 14 2010 at 7:46 PM Rating: Good
Look, you fUcking forum full of dumbfUcks, the cUnt went on about how safe she felt in never having her forum name connected to her real identity, so I fUcking googled her forum name and one of the first hits was a MySpace account. I posted her first name. Sorry. But seriously, it's fUcking ridiculous to act as if it was some horrible invasion of privacy. I won't do it again. I'll leave Pigtails alone. I tried to say as much to the admin who PM'd me and asked me to cease and desist but I was muted by the time I sent my response.

It's also laughable to mute me for posting something sexual after the first page of this thread was dominated by deepthroat talk. But whatever.

I don't expect most of you to get sarcasm, satire or laid, ever, but I'd reckon after close to 19k posts you could be expected to at least recognize my modus operandi. Here it is: I will fUck with you until you get the joke. Then we'll give each other reach-arounds and just giggle and play forever.

In closing, I think I owe Pigtails an apology:

Sure, you're fat, hideous, insipid, naive, fat, damaged and fatherless but you don't deserve to have me posting such uniquely identifying information as your first name. Especially as cryptically and scarily as I did! That must have been just terrifying.
#151 Mar 14 2010 at 7:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Guenny wrote:
Just I'd challenge you to come up with one example of when I have crossed any line as far as the actual written rules on this site state.



http://www.zam.com/ForumRules.html

Just under a quick search of your posts, I see instances of:

Posting NWS threads without tags in OOT,


Sogoro got us t-shirts. Images got nuked and a NWS tag got issued. I think the picture in reference was BT pretending to snort cocaine off of my ***? I don't recall any admins saying ANYTHING, the pic got nuked and I linked it to my photobucket with a nice NWS stamp. This happened once. Is this a serious offense, because I'm pretty sure it happens every day.

Quote:
filter breaking repeatedly in OOT despite prior warnings,


I can tell you with 100% certainty I've never broken the filter on this site. I don't even @#%^ing know how to, and on top of that I'm too lazy to figure it out. I'd really like you to find an example of this, or "repeated" examples as you so claim.

Quote:
Posting sexually explicit content,


Smiley: lol wat. Really? Me? I'm one of the biggest offenders on this one?

Quote:
Paragraph IX violations under the posting personal information clause,


Okay, so for future reference, noting that someone uses the same handle for the forum account as their myspace account is posting personal information? Gotcha.

Quote:
Harrasment under Paragraph I, mainly directed at Katielynn back in the day and she was recipricol, which is why that never got acted on more.


Are you kidding me? Are you trying to say Katie was the victim? You do realize that most people still think I was a stripper at one time or another because of her, don't you? Two years ago I couldn't make a single post without Katie being rabid towards me. I harassed her and she reciprocated? This is how we are rewriting history?

Quote:
Most of which resulted in verbal warnings in thread rather than PM. or edits by me or other admin staff. Or were under extenuating circumstances such as the other person was replying in kind so they got ignored.

But yes, there are more than a few.


I'm not intentionally butting heads, I'm just blindsided that apparently I am one to be made example of. And I'm appalled at the lack of professionalism and standards in handling the rules of the message board. So if I'm really the one sending people running off with their tails between their legs because I was too mean to Katie (omg LOL) or because I posted NWS fully-clothed pictures of my husband and me, and you feel like you have enough reason to ban me, I'd welcome it. I guess I've received as good of a reason as I'm going to, other than the list of hyperbolic offenses.

I knew you were grasping at straws with the "breaking the filter multiple times" thing. So, if that's your worst and in your small mind a justifaction for a ban, so be it.

Edited, Mar 14th 2010 8:14pm by Guenny
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 264 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (264)