LWV wrote:
You are arguing material which you have not read. This is a problem.
False, I'm asking you to prove your claim. That's a big difference. You don't take someone to court, give the judge a pile of documents and say there some evidence inside, look it up yourself. If you do that, your case will be dismissed. You highlight and point out exactly what you're referencing. Dude, this is life.
LWV wrote:
As I've said a thousand times, shady or possibly illegal activity was revealed in these documents. I'll let you read the rest. It's good for you. Think for yourself instead of letting the military think for you.
How is asking you to prove a claim "letting the military think" for me? That's quite ironic as you allowed these people to think for you. Your passage is in reference to the Iraqi people, not the US. Did you not know that there are Iraqis committing crimes in Iraq before these leaks? How is this a "war crime" from the US? There was no US or coalition involvement. That is their country, if they want to torture and kill their detainees, that's not our territory.
At this point, you're just grasping at straws hoping to find something. Once again, I don't deny that war crimes exist, but you haven't provided anything that specifically shown the US military committing war crimes. Even if you did find a documented war crime, your next step would be to prove that no corrective action was taken. Just because you didn't hear about it, doesn't mean anything wasn't done.
Think for a second, why would someone "cover up" war crimes, document it and then place it in the same database where multiple people have access to? Again, why would someone commit a crime and send up a report on it? What you are implying is absurd. I'm sure that majority of the war-crimes with no corrective actions are not documented.
Think for yourself... stop letting the media tool your emotions...