http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2010/results/polls/#USH00p1
I just typed "CNN 20XX exit polls" into Google.
Edited, Nov 3rd 2010 8:08pm by Jophiel
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln...
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln...Follow
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
The GOP demographically is largely made up of people in the working and middle classes. It's a pretty representative bell curve economically speaking. The Dems, on the other hand are split between very very rich people and very very poor people (a reverse bell curve really).
2004 2006 2008 2010
Income between... R-D R-D R-D R-D
Under $15k 36-63 30-67 25-73 -----
$15-$30,000 42-57 36-61 37-60 41-56 (under $30k)
$30-$50,000 49-50 43-56 43-55 46-51
$50-$75,000 56-43 48-50 49-48 52-46
$75-$100,000 55-45 47-52 48-51 56-42
$100-$150,000 57-42 51-47 51-48 56-42 ($100-$200k)
$150-$200,000 58-42 51-47 50-48 -----
Over $200,000 63-35 53-45 46-52 62-35
Data from CNN exit polls.
2008 was pretty flat once you got past $30,000-$50,000. 2004 & 2006 show a fairly notable inverse correlation between income and voting Democratic. Neither is a bell curve.
Nice data. Not remotely what I was talking about, of course. But nice anyway!
"People who voted for a given party for a given race in a given year" is not the same as a party demographic. But you took the time to format all that data, so good on you I guess...
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
"People who voted for a given party for a given race in a given year" is not the same as a party demographic.
Right, right... you wouldn't want to use any meaningful metric when you can just make up your own on the fly and insist that it really must be real because you said so.
It's OBVIOUS!!!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
gbaji wrote:
Repealed "by" the highest tax payer? I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
Sorry, that was supposed to say "repealed for the highest tax payers." My mistake.
4 elections of data over 6 years is "a given race in a given year?"
Edited, Nov 3rd 2010 11:36pm by trickybeck
trickybeck wrote:
4 elections of data over 6 years is "a given race in a given year?"
Funny too how the trends hold solid no matter if it's a strong GOP year, a strong Democratic year or something in between.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Well, 2008 was entirely anomalous in regards to how the richest demographic voted. But clearly the wealthy business owners saw Obama as the man they wanted that year right?
Edited, Nov 4th 2010 12:01am by Allegory
Edited, Nov 4th 2010 12:01am by Allegory
what are you basing your bell curve statement on then Gbaji?
Edited, Nov 4th 2010 12:26am by Xsarus
Edited, Nov 4th 2010 12:26am by Xsarus
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Lord Nobby wrote:
You know who else was a terrible candidate?
Hitler.
Hitler.
Quite certain the vegetarian war veteran with a straight up "I'll totally save the country. Just you watch me." plan seemed pretty cool at the time. He just "forgot" to mention the whole world domination/genocide thing is all. Just about anyone could forget something as minor as that.
varusword75 wrote:
Yeah the poor and ignorant vote democrat...tell us something we don't already know.
So you're saying if you had less money you'd be a Democrat?
varusword75 wrote:
Moe,
I think I was pretty clear on what I said, even for you.
But here it is again;
What part of this is confusing you?
Poor stupid people actually believe the Democrats when they tell them they're going to get something for nothing.
I think I was pretty clear on what I said, even for you.
But here it is again;
Quote:
Yeah the poor and ignorant vote democrat
What part of this is confusing you?
Poor stupid people actually believe the Democrats when they tell them they're going to get something for nothing.
Oh, I got what you meant. So you're saying that if you had less money you'd vote Democrat?
varusword75 wrote:
By and large most people who are poor are that way by choice.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
By and large most people who are poor are that way by choice.
Really?
MoebiusLord wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
By and large most people who are poor are that way by choice.
Really?
Poor Aethien. He still thinks Varus can be reasoned with like an intelligent human being.
No, not really. I'm just bored and I figured I could always just skip over the reply if it's too retarded.
Aethia,
Quite simply, which I know you love, each person is responsible for their actions and ones actions determine where they end up, be it financial, spiritually, or ideologically.
This is why Democrats run to govn, or simply quit (like Obama's entire economic team), when life doesn't turn out the way they think it should. This is also why nearly 75% of people making less than 15k annually vote Democrat. The Democrats tell them it's not their fault; they're in the situation they're in because of oppressive govn, oppressive corporations, racism, prejudice, bigotry, or whatever other excuse they allow these losers to pin their current situation on.
Quote:
And how did you come to this conclusion?
Quite simply, which I know you love, each person is responsible for their actions and ones actions determine where they end up, be it financial, spiritually, or ideologically.
This is why Democrats run to govn, or simply quit (like Obama's entire economic team), when life doesn't turn out the way they think it should. This is also why nearly 75% of people making less than 15k annually vote Democrat. The Democrats tell them it's not their fault; they're in the situation they're in because of oppressive govn, oppressive corporations, racism, prejudice, bigotry, or whatever other excuse they allow these losers to pin their current situation on.
S'funny how, on the one hand, varus and folk like him, argue for self-determination leading to eventual personel outcome in matters of finance, business, economics, social responsibility etc, which in other words are 'survival of the fittest' or 'reap the fruits of ones labours' type scenarios, where the strong do well, and go on to enjoy their successes, which is the basic theory of evolution, where organisms that adapt to survive and become successful, but when it comes to actual Evolution, they reject in in favour of Creationism which has no room whatsover for the same ideas.
Seems somewhat contradictory to me.
Seems somewhat contradictory to me.
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.
paulsol wrote:
Seems somewhat contradictory to me.
Varus is no stranger to cognitive dissonance.
I dunno... according to Gbaji, the richest people in the universe are all Democrats as well. So I guess failures like Varus are a bunch of chumps if they can't reach Democrat-level awesomeness.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Paula,
Well for one there's a big difference between societal and biological evolution.
This does not mean that one species can evolve into another no matter how many times radical liberals tell people they evolved from apes.
http://www2.lucidcafe.com/lucidcafe/library/96feb/darwin.html
Edited, Nov 4th 2010 4:53pm by varusword75
Well for one there's a big difference between societal and biological evolution.
Quote:
Darwin's theory of evolutionary selection holds that variation within species occurs randomly and that the survival or extinction of each organism is determined by that organism's ability to adapt to its environment
This does not mean that one species can evolve into another no matter how many times radical liberals tell people they evolved from apes.
http://www2.lucidcafe.com/lucidcafe/library/96feb/darwin.html
Edited, Nov 4th 2010 4:53pm by varusword75
Jophed,
You sure do like to use the word "failure" a lot. I guess it's something you liberals are all to familiar with.
You sure do like to use the word "failure" a lot. I guess it's something you liberals are all to familiar with.
varusword75 wrote:
You sure do like to use the word "failure" a lot.
I figure it's something you'd understand, Teach.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Recent Visitors: 273
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (273)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln...
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC