Honestly, i'm surprised they would nuke a post just because you said gbaji did not rape and kill a girl in 1990. I mean, of course he didn't rape and kill a girl in 1990.
Honestly, I'm surprised they would nuke a post just because you said gbaji did not rape and kill a girl in 1990. I mean, of course he didn't rape and kill a girl in 1990.
Of course he didn't rape and kill a girl in 1990; he was only, like 10 years old then.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
I've nuked hundreds of thousands of posts over the years. I actually didn't nuke that one, but it was a bit much really when you consider that leaves a searchable text record that some people might not see in context, so i might have anyways.
So yeah, your post got nuked. what do you want, a cookie?
He made a post that said several times that you did not rape and murder a girl in 1990, putting "gbaji" and "raped and murdered a girl in 1990" in big bold text, but not "not".
He made a post that said several times that you did not rape and murder a girl in 1990, putting "gbaji" and "raped and murdered a girl in 1990" in big bold text, but not "not".
It was a bit by Gilbert Gottfried, from the link in my OP
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
Hey, even if he was with her while she was technically being raped, he didn't leave any marks on her. It's not legitimate rape if no marks were left on her.