Almalieque wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
. *shrug* When I am worried about my life or the life of the ones close to me, there is little precious time for jurisprudence.
They will figure it out afterwards. If I was wrong.. well, I did what I thought was right given the set of information at my disposal at the time.
I am sure more facts will surface and it may affect public opinion somewhat, but as it stands right now, you are simply wrong. I am not even sure why we are discussing it.
No, really. Why are we discussing it?
They will figure it out afterwards. If I was wrong.. well, I did what I thought was right given the set of information at my disposal at the time.
I am sure more facts will surface and it may affect public opinion somewhat, but as it stands right now, you are simply wrong. I am not even sure why we are discussing it.
No, really. Why are we discussing it?
He didn't, nor any prudent person in that situation, think that he was doing the right thing. This isn't 1940... Teenagers tend to have sex. Teenagers often sneak in/out of rooms. Teenagers often lie to their parents about their love life. There was absolutely no evidence of his daughter being raped.
I'm not claiming that he did or didn't violate any laws. I'm claiming that what he did was wrong. Just like the up skirt picture scandal. It was totally legal and legit.
Are you trying to tell me that in the olden times things were better and teenagers didn't have sex?
Really?