Smasharoo wrote:
Correct. And I think that's wrong. But that's "individuals having their property seized and homes on said property destroyed". This is not the same as "Israelis are not allowing a Palestinian state to exist so it's ok for Palestinians to oppose the existence of an Israeli state"
It does actually. as the "existence of an Israeli state" was literally a process of "individuals having their property seized and homes on said property destroyed" 50 years ago or whatever it is now.
That's just completely false. WTF? You just make **** up?
Quote:
So, YES, MASSIVELY relevant. It's the modern ONGOING version of what the core complaint about Israel is.
No. It's not. It's not relevant, and it's not the core complaint about Israel. The core complaint about Israel is that it's a Jewish state. Period. If it were a Muslim state, which had otherwise formed in the exact same manner, with the same funding, and the same political support, no one would be arguing it had no right to exist. Want to know why I know this? Because every single one of the other states around there were formed as Muslim states, in ways very similar to Israel. And no one argues they don't have a right to exist.
All the BS about Israel "stealing land", is just that: BS. All the other nations (Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, and Iran) were formed by European interests drawing lines on a map. Every. Single. One. They are all just as arbitrary as any other, and in all cases, you could argue that the local nomads got screwed by the arrangements. Yet only Israel is singled out for this. It's not about how their nation was formed, or who decided who got which land. It's never been about that. It's is ultimately about antisemitism and religious intolerance. That's it. The Muslims can't stand the idea of a Jewish state in the region. Period.
Quote:
Just how stupid are you, exactly?
Hell of a lot smarter than you, apparently. I can at least read a history book and make sense of it. You? Not so much.