Almalieque wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
You would think that after reading my previous post my point would be obvious, but I guess not.
angrymnk wrote:
So there is a line, not your line, but a line nonetheless.
angrymnk wrote:
Is it fair to say it is the line created by society?
There is no unification on the definition of the line, hence the the point of this conversation. This isn't Physics, so it's purely opinionated. Therefore, what constitutes as acceptable forms of torture can and will vary.
False. Truth exists whether you believe in it or not. And amusingly enough, physics is hardly as deterministic as you seem to think ( at our current understanding of quantum physics anyway ).
What I am saying is, as long as we can agree on a definition, we may be able to agree to a line ( which apparently exists regardless of your acknowledgment of its existence ).
See? I didn't even deem it your line. It is just a line now. See how accommodating I am?