angrymnk wrote:
Is there any particular reason he bothers you so much? I am too lazy to actually search for anything thay has you both in it so if you can please give us a gift of a good chrismas story, it would be mildly appreciated.
He doesn't like it when he is proven wrong. Ugly is like Smash in where they both like to use derision as their main arguing tool. The intent is to have the other person so offended and/or bothered, that s/he drops out. Smash actually believes in what he says, while Ugly admittedly will just troll. He doesn't like to be confronted and lose to a person who he think is stupid.
Bijou wrote:
1. An early posting history of poor writing skillz.
2. A somewhat later history of deciding for everyone what words mean (a la gbaji)
3. A continuous posting history of being repetitive ad nauseum
1. I suck at grammar, but it's pretty asinine to pretend that I'm the only one who commit grammatical crimes.
2. If by "deciding" you mean "correcting". People tend to purposefully misuse words to support their claim.
3. You mean like creating 30 different posts on same sex marriage. Hint: I didn't create those, I participated in them.
Ugly wrote:
He can't comprehend a single word said to him. He makes up definitions to words, or takes the most abstract definition of the word and misconstrues its meaning. He's horrendous at communicating his point and will argue 25 pages that what you said is wrong but in the end, it turns out he completely agrees with you. When he thinks he's made a point, despite people saying they don't understand his point, his attempt at helping you understand him is to simply requote what he already said over and over again. This brings us back to he can't comprehend a single word said to him and he's terrible at communicating. I'd add more but I've already spent more effort on him this week than I'd like to in a year. I would prefer to have never met him and not realize there are people that stunned truly existing on this planet. I would love nothing more than to be oblivious of his existence.
I think this word salad that you used to attack my communication skills is quite ironic.
The reason why the whole "page 14" started is because I wasted time repeating myself because no one was actually reading *all* of my posts. I would argue 25 pages only to find out that there was no real difference because the other person "didn't have time to read everything". As a result, I would repeat it once or twice, then I will either quote or reference myself. To somehow spin the facts, when others have openly admitted in commenting without reading is misleading. You let people like angrymnk think he actually has a point.