Almalieque wrote:
Angrymnk wrote:
How am I doing?
Pretty bad, because you're only picking parts of the oath without acknowledging who we all ultimately *support* and their responsibility to the nation. Just because you think something is "unconstitutional" doesn't mean it is. I wasn't mocking the constitution, just your understanding of how it plays a part in this conversation.
..Dude..
Quote:
You mean that document edged in stone by God himself written a hundred years ago that never once changed or been challenged to adapt to current society? That constitution?
You made a mistake. Own up to it and move on. If you were not mocking it, how exactly was I supposed to understand this fragment? Please, do tell.
The oath sounds pretty un·am·big·u·ous [ not open to interpretation ] to me. When the constitution says "don't do this", and you do it anyway, it is unconstitutional [ not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules.] . It is not rocket science.
Alma,
I sincerely hope the rest of people around you do not share the same sentiments. Anyone on this forum can weigh in? The only military guy I know was in Vietnam so my rosy eyed view of the military is somewhat skewed.
Edit,
I will add to your argument about support; if you are supporting the president ( your boss ). We are your boss's boss ( I can't believe the cynic in me did not stop me from posting this ).
Edited, Apr 26th 2015 4:12pm by angrymnk Edited, Apr 26th 2015 4:19pm by angrymnk Edited, Apr 26th 2015 4:19pm by angrymnk