Bijou wrote:
Alma doesn't understand what unreasonable means, partucularily in the phrase "unreasonable search and seizure". Spying on my online activity and sifting my phone calls for keywods is the same as opening every piece of my mail. ie. **************************
Angrymnk wrote:
You made a mistake. Own up to it and move on. If you were not mocking it, how exactly was I supposed to understand this fragment? Please, do tell.
Angrymnk wrote:
The oath sounds pretty un·am·big·u·ous [ not open to interpretation ] to me. When the constitution says "don't do this", and you do it anyway, it is unconstitutional [ not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules.] . It is not rocket science.
angrymnk wrote:
Alma,
I sincerely hope the rest of people around you do not share the same sentiments. Anyone on this forum can weigh in? The only military guy I know was in Vietnam so my rosy eyed view of the military is somewhat skewed.
Edit,
I will add to your argument about support; if you are supporting the president ( your boss ). We are your boss's boss ( I can't believe the cynic in me did not stop me from posting this ).
I sincerely hope the rest of people around you do not share the same sentiments. Anyone on this forum can weigh in? The only military guy I know was in Vietnam so my rosy eyed view of the military is somewhat skewed.
Edit,
I will add to your argument about support; if you are supporting the president ( your boss ). We are your boss's boss ( I can't believe the cynic in me did not stop me from posting this ).