gbaji wrote:
The only factor that one can point the finger at is that there is a strong force keeping the children of those poor today poor tomorrow, thus perpetuating economic disparity by race over time. But a free market should have jumbled that up decades ago. So what his this force? And then we come to welfare, which just happens to provide strong disincentives to upward mobility, greater acceptance of a dependent lifestyle, and actively encourages procreation out of wedlock. All symptoms we see most prevalent among black communities.
Wrong! It's obviously Feminism, which taught black women to get fathers out of their childrens' lives and live like hoe bags. Welfare was merely a tool of the sisterhood to destroy traditional family values, not the root cause. It was tried everywhere, but it was most effective in the black community. It's like you don't know anything.
Get on my level, Gbaji.
Obviously, I'm like 98% joking here. Debalic wrote:
Ooh, Gary Johnston's running again!
Johnson. No T. This isn't the "T" party.
I met him once at a state fair(in the "Politicians shaking folks' hands" sort of way) back when he was still our governor. He had just done some bungee jumping or something like that, so teenage me thought that was pretty cool. Honestly, given the other choices, if I bother to vote this year(which depends on local elections I haven't looked at yet), it'd probably be for him. About the only thing I've seen that I really disagree with him on is NASA.